Deneysel Çalışma Yönteminin Temel Mikrobiyoloji Kavramlarının Öğretimine Etkisi

Bu çalışmada, temel mikrobiyoloji kavramlarının öğretilmesinde deneysel uygulamaların etkisi araştırılmıştır. Araştırmada tek gruplu ön test son test deneysel desen kullanılmıştır. Çalışma, 32 öğretmen adayı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Öğretmen adaylarının temel mikrobiyoloji kavramlarına ilişkin bilgileri ve mikrobiyoloji uygulamalarının bu kavramları öğrenmeye etkisi, ön test ve son test olarak uygulanan bir kavram testi ile incelenmiştir. Her deneysel uygulamadan önce, bir ön test ile öğrencilerin verilen temel kavramları tanımlamaları istenmiştir. Daha sonra deneysel uygulama yapılmış ve iki hafta sonra, öğrencilerin aynı kavramları bir kez daha tanımlamaları istenmiştir. Verilerin analizinde yapılandırıcı içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Her kavram için yanlış ve bilmiyorum cevapları 0, eksik cevap 1, doğru cevap 2 puan verilerek kodlanmıştır. Böylece elde edilen ön test - son test puanları, nonparametrik bir yöntem olan "Wilcoxon İşaretli Sıralar Testi" kullanılarak karşılaştırılmıştır. Laboratuvar uygulamalarının öğretmen adaylarının, daha önce bilmedikleri kavramlar hakkında doğru bilgi edinmelerinde ve yanlış anlamalarını düzeltmede etkili olduğu belirlenmiştir.

The Effect of Experimental Study Method on Teaching Basic Microbiology Concepts

In this study, the effects of experimental applications in the teaching of basicconcepts in microbiology have been investigated. In the research, one-grouppretest–posttest pre-experimental design was used. The study was conducted with32 pre-service teachers. In the study, pre-service students’ understanding of thebasic concepts of microbiology, and the effects of microbiology applications ontheir learning were investigated by a concept test with a pre-test post-testapplication. Before each experimental application, the pre-service teachers wereasked to define the basic concepts in the pre-test concept test. Then, theexperimental application was carried out and two weeks later, they were asked todefine the same concepts once more. Constructive content analysis method was usedin the analysis of the data. Each concept was coded as giving the wrong answer andI don’t know the answer 0, missing answer 1, correct answer 2 points. Thus,obtained pre-test and post-test scores were compared by using "Wilcoxon MarkedRanks Test", a nonparametric method. It was determined that laboratoryapplications were effective on pre-service teachers in obtaining accurateinformation about concepts they previously did not know and in correcting theirmisconceptions, if they had any.

___

  • Amir, R., & Tamir, P. (1994). In-dept analysis of misconceptions as a basis for developing research-based remedial instruction: The case of photosynthesis. The American Biology Teacher, 56, 94-100.
  • Anderson, O. R. (1992). Some interrelationships between constructivist models of learning and current neurobiological theory, with implications for science education. Journal of Research and Science Teaching, 29, 1037-1058.
  • Anderson, C. W., Sheldon, T. H., & Dubay, J. (1990). The effects of instruction on college on majors’ conceptions of respiration and photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 761-776.
  • Atav, E., Erdem, E., Yılmaz, A., & Gücüm, B. (2004). Enzimler konusunun anlamlı öğrenilmesinde analoji oluşturmanın etkisi [The effect of developing analogies for meaningful learning of the subject of enzymes]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 27, 21-29.
  • Aydın, S. (2015). High school science students’ ideas about microorganisms and their place in the curriculum. International Journal of Biology Education, 4(2), 108-119.
  • Bahar, M. (2003). Misconceptions in biology education and conceptual change strategies. Theory and Practice, 3(1), 55-64.
  • Bahar, M., Johnstone, H. A., & Hansell, M. (1999). Revisiting learning difficulties in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 33(2), 84-87.
  • Bektaşlı, F. (2018). Fen ve biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının arkebakteri, bakteri ve protista âlemleri hakkındaki bilgi düzeyleri ve kavram yanılgıları [Preservice science and biology teachers' knowledge level and misconceptions about archaebacteria, bacteria and protista kingdoms]. Master Thesis, Hacettepe University Graduate School of Educational Sciences Ankara, Turkey.
  • Bell, B. F., Gilbert, Y. K., & Osborne, R. J. (1983). Science teaching and children's view of the world. Journal of in Science Teaching, 5, 1-14.
  • Berck, K. H. (1999). Biologiedidaktik Grundlagen und Methoden. Wiebelsheim: Quelle Meyer Verlag.
  • Brown, C. R. (1990). Some misconceptions in meiosis shown by students responding to an advanced level practical examination question in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 24, 182-187.
  • Brown, D. E. (1992). Using examples and analogies to remediate misconceptions in physics: Factors influencing conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(1), 17-34.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Veri analizi el kitabı. [Data analysis manual]. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Canpolat, N., Pınarbaşı, T., Bayrakçeken S., & Geban, Ö. (2004). Kimyadaki bazı yaygın yanlış kavramalar [Some common misconceptions in chemistry]. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 24(1), 135-146.
  • Caramazza, A., McCloskey, M., & Green, B. (1981). Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces. Science, 210, 1130-1141.
  • Cavello, A. M. L., & Schafer, L. E. (1994). Relationship between students’ meaningful learning orientation and their understanding of genetic topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 228-232.
  • Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2014). Research methods, design and analysis (12th ed.). Pearson Education.
  • Colburn, A. (2000a). Constructivism: Science education’s “grand unifying theory”. The Clearing House, 74(1), 9- 12.
  • Colburn, A. (2000b). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, March, 42-44.
  • Coştu, B., Karataş, F. Ö., & Ayas, A. (2003). Kavram öğretiminde çalışma yapraklarının kullanılması [Use of worksheets in concept teaching]. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 2(14), 33-48.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.), California: SAGE Publications.
  • Çakıcı, Y. (2005). Exploring Turkish upper primary level pupils’ understanding of digestion. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 79–100.
  • Çaycı, B., Demir, M. K., Başaran, M., & Demir, M. (2007). Sosyal bilgiler dersinde işbirliğine dayalı öğrenme ile kavram öğretimi [Concept teaching with cooperative learning on social studies lesson]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 15(2), 619-630.
  • Çimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views? Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61-71.
  • Dikmenli, M., Türkmen, L., Çardak, O., & Kurt, H. (2005). Biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının bazı genel biyoloji konularındaki kavram yanılgılarının iki aşamalı çoktan seçmeli bir araç ile belirlenmesi [Determination of biology student teachers' misconceptions about some biological concepts with a two tier multiple choice test]. Dokuz Eylül University Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 17, 365-370.
  • Dumais, N., & Hasni, A. (2009). High school intervention for influenza biology and epidemics/pandemics: Impact on conceptual understanding among adolescents. Life Sciences Education, 8, 62-71.
  • Eryılmaz, A., & Tatlı, A. (2000). ODTÜ öğrencilerinin mekanik konusundaki kavram yanılgıları [METU students' misconceptions about mechanics]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 18, 93-98.
  • Eser, H., Çetin, G., Özarslan, M., & Işık, E. (2015). Biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının mikroplara ilişkin görüşlerinin çizme-yazma tekniğine göre incelenmesi [Investigation of the prospective biology teachers’ views about microbes through the draw and write technique]. International Journal of Education, Science and Technology, 1(1), 17-25.
  • Fensham, P. (1988). Development and dilemmas in science education (1st ed.). The Falmer Press.
  • Fisher, K. M. (1985). A misconception in biology: Amino acids and translation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(1), 53-62.
  • Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children’s science and its consequences for teaching. Science Educations, 66(4), 623-633.
  • Gonzalez, F. M. (1997). Diagnosis of Spanish primary school student’s common alternative science concepts. School Science and Mathematics, 97(2), 68-74.
  • Gökdere, M., & Orbay, M. (2005). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının mekanik kavramlarını anlama düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi [Evaluating science teacher candidates' level of understanding of mechanical concepts]. XIV. National Educational Sciences Congress, 28-30 September 2005. Pamukkale University Faculty of Education Denizli, Turkey.
  • Güneş, T., Güneş, H., & Çelikler, D. (2006). Fen bilgisi öğretmenliği programı biyoloji II ders konularının öğretilmesinde kavram haritası kullanımının öğrenci başarısı üzerine etkileri [The effect of concept map using on student success in the teaching of biology II subjects presented in science teacher programme]. Ahi Evran University Journal of Education, 7(2), 39-49.
  • Güneş, T., Şener Dilek, N., Demir, E. S., Hoplan, M., & Çelikoğlu, M. (2010). Öğretmenlerin kavram öğretimi, kavram yanılgılarını saptama ve giderme çalışmaları üzerine nitel bir araştırma [A qualitative research on the efforts of teachers about the concept teaching, determination and elimination of the misconceptions]. International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications 11-13 November 2010. Antalya, Turkey.
  • Huddle, P. A., & Pillay, A. E. (1996). An in depth study of misconceptions in stoichiometry and chemical equilibrium at a South African University. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 33(1), 65-77.
  • Hürcan Gürler, H., & Önder, İ. (2014). 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin fen ve teknoloji dersinde öğrendikleri “bakteri ve virüs” kavramlarını günlük yaşamla ilişkilendirme durumlarının belirlenmesi [Determination of the relationship building status of 7th grade students the concepts of bacteria and viruses that they learned in science and technology course with daily life]. III. Congress of Educational Research in Sakarya 12 June 2014 (pp. 80-86). Sakarya, Turkey.
  • Jones, G., Gardner, G. E., Lee, T., Poland, K., & Robert, S. (2013). The impact of microbiology instruction on students’ perceptions of risks related to microbial illness. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 3(3), 199-213.
  • Jones, M. G., & M. J. Rua. (2006). Conceptions of germs: Expert to novice understandings of microorganisms. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 10(3), 1-40.
  • Karadon, H. D., & Şahin, N. (2010). Primary school students’ basic knowledge, opinions and risk perceptions about microorganisms. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4398-4401.
  • Kılıç, D., & Sağlam, N. (2014). Students’ understanding of genetics concepts: The effect of reasoning ability and learning approaches. Journal of Biological Education, 48(2), 63-70.
  • Kılıç, D., Atav, E., & Sağlam, N. (2006). 9. sınıf öğrencilerinin somatik ve eşey hücreleri kavramlarını anlama düzeyleri [9th grade students' level of understanding of somatic and germ cells concepts]. 7th National Science and Mathematics Education Congress 7-9 September 2006. Gazi University, Ankara.
  • Kinchin, I. M., De-Leij, F. A. A. M., & Hay, D. B. (2005). The evolution of a collaborative concept mapping activity for undergraduate microbiology students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 29(1), 1-14.
  • Köhler, K. (2010). Welche Fachgemäßen Arbeitsweisen werden im Biologieunterricht eingesetzt? In Ulrike Spörhase-Eichmann & Wolfgang Ruppert (Hrgs.), Biologiedidaktik Praxishandbuch für die Sekundarstufe I und II (S 146-159). Cornelsen Verlag.
  • Kurt, H. (2013). Biology student teachers’ cognitive structure about “Living thing". Educational Research and Reviews, 8 (12), 871-880.
  • Kurt, H., & Ekici, G. (2013). Biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının “bakteri” konusundaki bilişsel yapılarının ve alternatif kavramlarının belirlenmesi [Determining biology student teachers’ cognitive structure and alternative concepts on the concept of “bacteria”]. Turkish Studies, 8(8), 885-910.
  • Larson, E., Ferng, Y., Wong, J., Alverez-Cid, M., Barrett, A., Gonzalez, M. J., Wang, S., & Morse, S. S. (2009). Knowledge and misconceptions regarding upper respiratory infections among urban Hispanic households: Need for targeted messaging. Journal of Immigrant Minority Health, 11, 71-82.
  • Mann, M., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). A pencil and paper instrument to diagnose students’ conceptions of breathing, gas exchange and respiration. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 44, 55-60.
  • Mayring, P. (2002). Einführung in die qualitative sozialforschung. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz Verlag.
  • Nakhleh, M. B., & Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Influence of levels of information as presented by different technologies on students’ understanding of acid, base and pH concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(10), 1077-1096.
  • Novak, J. (1988). Learning science and the science of learning. Studies in Science Education, 15, 77-101. Odom, A. L. (1995) Secondary and college biology student’s misconceptions about diffusion and osmosis. American Biology Teacher, 57, 409-415.
  • Özyürek, M. (1983). Kavram öğrenme ve öğretme [Concept learning and teaching]. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 16(2), 347-366.
  • Pines, L. A. & West, L. H. T. (1986). Conceptual understanding and science learning: An interpretation of research within a sources-of-knowledge framework. Science Education, 70(5), 583-604.
  • Romine, W. L., Barrow, L. H., & Folk, W. R. (2013). Exploring secondary students' knowledge and misconceptions about influenza: Development, validation, and implementation of a multiple choice influenza knowledge scale. International Journal of Science Education, 35(11), 1874-1901.
  • Romine, W., Siegel, M., & Roberts, T. (2009). Analysing secondary science teachers ‘alternative conceptions related to avian influenza. Paper presentation at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching annual meeting, Garden Grove, CA.
  • Sander, M. (1993). Erroneous ideas about respiration: The teacher factor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 919-934.
  • Schoon, J. K., & Boone, J. W. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 82, 553-568.
  • Selvi, M., & Yakışan, M. (2004). Üniversite birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin enzimler konusu ile ilgili kavram yanılgıları [Misconceptions about enzymes in university students]. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 24(2), 173-182.
  • Senemoğlu, N. (2013). Gelişim, öğrenme ve öğretim kuramdan uygulamaya (23. bs.) [Development, learning and teaching from theory to practice (23. ed.)]. Ankara: Yargı Yayınevi.
  • Songer, C. J., & Mintzes, J. J. (1994). Understanding cellular respiration: an analysis of conceptual change in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 621-637.
  • Stewart, J., Hafner, D., & Dala, M. (1990). Students’ alternative views of meiosis. The American Biology Teacher, 52, 228-232.
  • Sungur, S., Tekkaya, C., & Geban, Ö. (2001). The contribution of conceptual change texts accompanied by concept mapping to students’ understanding of the human circulatory system, School Science and Mathematics, 101, 91–101.
  • Tekkaya, C. Çapa, Y., & Yılmaz, Ö. (2000). Biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının genel biyoloji konularındaki kavram yanılgıları [Pre-service biology teachers' misconceptions about general biology]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 18, 140-147.
  • Tekkaya, C., & Balcı, S. (2003). Öğrencilerin fotosentez ve bitkilerde solunum konularındaki kavram yanılgılarının saptanması [Determination of students’ misconceptions concerning photosynthesis and respiration in plants]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 24, 101-107.
  • Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169.
  • Tsai, W. C., & Huang, Y. M. (2002). Mechanisms linking employee affective delivery and customer behavioural intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1001-1008.
  • Uzunkaya, A. (2007). Kavram yanılgısı ve çoklu zekâ alanlarının ilişkilendirilmesine dayalı bir öğretimin kavram yanılgılarının giderilmesindeki etkisinin incelenmesi: Mikroorganizmalar [The study of the effects of instruction based on relating misconceptions and multiple intelligence areas on breaking misconceptions; Microorganism]. Master Thesis, Balıkesir University Institute of Science and Technology, Balıkesir, Turkey.
  • Uzunkaya, A. & Özgür, S. (2011). Dominant zekâ alanlarına dayalı bir öğretimin kavram yanılgılarının giderilmesindeki etkisi [Effects of an instruction based on dominant intelligence on overcoming misconceptions]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 41, 461-472.
  • Venville, G., Gribble, S. J., & Donovan, J. (2005). An exploration of young children's understandings of genetics concepts from ontological and epistemological perspectives. Science Education, 89(4), 614-633.
  • Willerman, M., & MacHarg, R. A. (1991). The concept map as an advance organizer. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), 705-711.
  • Yağbasan, R., & Gülçiçek, Ç. (2003). Fen öğretiminde kavram yanılgılarının karakteristiklerinin tanımlanması [Describing the characteristics of misconceptions in science teaching]. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 1(13), 102-120.
  • Yakışan, M., Yel, M., & Mutlu, M. (2009). Biyoloji öğretiminde bilgisayar animasyonlarının kullanılmasının öğrenci başarısı üzerine etkisi [Effect of computer animations upon student’s achievement of biology education]. Ahi Evran University Journal of Education, 10(2), 129-139.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Yip, D. Y. (1998). Teachers’ misconceptions of the circulatory system. Journal of Biological Education, 32, 207- 215.
  • Yürük, N., & Çakır, Ö. S. (2000). Lise öğrencilerinde oksijenli ve oksijensiz solunum konusunda görülen kavram yanılgılarının saptanması [Determination of misconceptions in high school students about oxygenated and nonoxygenated respiration]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 18, 185-19.
Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

2007, 2013 ve 2018 Yılları Kimya Dersi Öğretim Programları Kazanımlarının Yenilenmiş Bloom Taksonomisi’ne Göre Analiz Edilmesi, Değerlendirilmesi ve Karşılaştırılması

Mehmet Diyaddin YAŞAR, Sibel SADİ-YILMAZ

Visual Culture-Based Workshop: Visual Diaries

Ebru GÜLER

Öğrenci ve Öğretmen Bakış Açısıyla Kelime Öğrenme Stratejilerinin Algılanan Önemi, Kullanımı ve Öğretimi

Funda Ölmez Çağlar, F. Özlem Saka

Content Analysis of Research on Processes of Constructing Knowledge in Mathematics Education in Turkey

Faden TOPUZ, Berna CANTÜRK GÜNHAN

Perceived Importance, Use and Instruction of Vocabulary Learning Strategies from Students’ and Teachers’ Perspectives

Funda ÖLMEZ-ÇAĞLAR, Özlem SAKA

Çevrim-içi Ortamlar ve Dijital Ebeveynlik: Yaklaşımlar, Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Süleyman Sadi SEFEROĞLU, Ayça FİDAN

Social Support and School Climate as Predictors of School Connectedness in High School Students

Ali Rıza YAVRUTÜRK, Tahsin İLHAN, Kemal BAYTEMİR

Students’ and Teacher’s Views on the Effectiveness of Multiple Intelligences-Assisted Layered Curriculum in the Social Studies Course

Ali Sinan BİLGİLİ, Mehmet Nuri GÖMLEKSİZ, Ümmühan ÖNER

50 Yaş Üstü Yetişkinlerde Sosyal Medya Kullanımının İncelenmesi

Hatice YILDIZ DURAK, Emel TEKİN

Mobil Uygulama ile Desteklenmiş Ters-Yüz Öğretim Ortamını Kullanan Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarılarının ve İşbirlikli Öğrenmeye Yönelik Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi

Zafer BOLATLI, Agah Tuğrul KORUCU