Cankiri Baris Manco Children's Playground Safety Evaluation of Compliance Criteria

Playgrounds are so effective for the children’s social, sensual, cognitive and physical development. These grounds, if they wouldn’t designed in significant criterias, they can cause hurtings and injuries that affects child’s development negatively. In this study, Barış Manço Children’s Playground, located in Çankırı and as specified for the kids aged between 0-7, and the physical properties of the game elements on the playground were analyzed by TSE (Turkish Standards Institution) safety standards, were assayed for standards compliance. USCPSC (U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission) standards were included the study, because TSE standards don’t have criteria in terms of discriminations in the age of the children and playground site selection. Besides, in this study, it was examined that other outfit equipments, plants on the area and playground’s maintenance status in terms of safety. At the end of the study, 78% of playground equipments were determined that not suitable for TSE standards. In accordance with the results that are obtained, suggestions have been made in terms of landscape architecture. 

Cankiri Baris Manco Children's Playground Safety Evaluation of Compliance Criteria

Playgrounds are so effective for the children’s social, sensual, cognitive and physical development. These grounds, if they wouldn’t designed in significant criterias, they can cause hurtings and injuries that affects child’s development negatively. In this study, Barış Manço Children’s Playground, located in Çankırı and as specified for the kids aged between 0-7, and the physical properties of the game elements on the playground were analyzed by TSE (Turkish Standards Institution) safety standards, were assayed for standards compliance. USCPSC (U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission) standards were included the study, because TSE standards don’t have criteria in terms of discriminations in the age of the children and playground site selection. Besides, in this study, it was examined that other outfit equipments, plants on the area and playground’s maintenance status in terms of safety. At the end of the study, 78% of playground equipments were determined that not suitable for TSE standards. In accordance with the results that are obtained, suggestions have been made in terms of landscape architecture. 

___

  • o Açık, Y., Gülbayrak, C. and Turacı Çelik, G. 2004. Investigation of the Level of Safety and Appropriateness of Playgrounds in Elazig City in Turkey. International Journal of Environmental Health Research 14(1), 75-82.
  • o Bal, A. 2005. Zonguldak Kenti Yeşil Alan Sistemindeki Çocuk Oyun Alanlarının Durumunun Peyzaj Mimarlığı İlkeleri Açısından İrdelenmesi, Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 155s., Zonguldak.
  • o Botsoglou, K., Hrisikou, S. and Kakana, D. M. 2011. Measuring Safety Levels in Playgrounds Using Environment Assessment Scales: The issue Of Playground Safety in Greece. Early Child Development and Care 181(6), 749-760.
  • o Jaspert, J., Cavanagh, S. and Debono, J. 1988. Thinking of Small Children Access, Provision and Play, We Welcome Small Children Campaign, London.
  • o Heseltine, P. and Holborn, J. 1987. Playgrounds: The Planning, Design and Construction of Play Environments, Nichols Publish Company, New York.
  • o MEB 2012. Oyun Etkinliği-I. T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, 2012.
  • o Moore, R. C. 1993. Plants for Play, MIG Communications, Berkeley, California.
  • o Pekin, Timur, U. 2012. Planting Children’s Playgrounds: Çankırı City Case. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 10 (3&4 ) : 977-981. Senda, M. 1992. Design of Children’s Play Environments, McGraw-Hill Companies, New York. o
  • o SMP 2013. Smp Specifiers Guide to EN 1176 Parts 1 to 7 Playground Equıpment. SMP Ltd, http://www.mobyitaly.it/content/uploads/files/certificazione-europea-en1176.pdf (alıntının yapıldığı tarih: 07.05.2013) Şişman, E. E. ve Özyavuz, M. 2010. Çocuk Oyun Alanlarının Dağılımı ve Kullanım Yeterliliği: Tekirdağ Örneği. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 7(1), 13-22.
  • o TS EN-1176-2 2010. Oyun Alanı Elemanları ve Zemin Düzenlemeleri-Bölüm 2: Salıncaklar İçin İlâve Özel Güvenlik Kuralları ve Deney Metotları. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, 2010.
  • o TS EN 1176-3 2010. Oyun Alanı Elemanları ve Zemin Düzenlemeleri-Bölüm 3: Kaydıraklar İçin İlâve
  • Özel Güvenlik Kuralları ve Deney Metotları. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, 2010.
  • o TS EN 1176-5 2010. Oyun Alanı Elemanları ve Zemin Düzenlemeleri-Bölüm 5: Atlıkarıncalar İçin İlave Özel Güvenlik Kuralları ve Deney Metotları. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, 2010.
  • o TS EN 1176-6 2010. Oyun Alanı Elemanları ve Zemin Düzenlemeleri-Bölüm 6: Sallanma Elemanları İçin İlave Özel Güvenlik Kuralları ve Deney Metotları. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, 2010.
  • o TS EN 1177 2011. Darbe Azaltıcı Oyun Alanı Zemin Düzenlemeleri-Kritik Düşme Yüksekliğinin
  • Belirlenmesi. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, 2010.
  • o USCSPC 2008. Public Playground Safety Handbook. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 2008. o Yılmaz, S. and Bulut, Z. 2002. Kentsel Mekanlarda Çocuk Oyun Alanları Planlama ve Tasarım İlkeleri, Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 33 (3), 345-351.