BARTIN İLİ VE YAKIN ÇEVRESİ PEYZAJ ÖZELLİKLERİNİ ETKİLEYEN İKLİM PARAMETRELERİNİN ANALİZİ VE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Peyzaj planlama, peyzajın korunması ve onun temel unsurları olan doğal ve kültürel özelliklerin en uygun şekilde kullanılmasını hedeflemektedir. Doğal peyzaj değerlerinin saptanmasında ise önemli unsurlardan biri iklim faktörüdür. İklime ilişkin ayrıntılı analizlerin yapılması ve bu analizlerin ölçülebilir bir yöntemle değerlendirilmesi ile optimum plan kararları üretilebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Bartın, Peyzaj Özellikleri, İklim, Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS)

DETERMINATION AND EVALUATION OF CLIMATE PARAMETERS EFFECTING LANDSCAPE FEATURES OF BARTIN AND ITS ENVIRONS

Landscape planning has aimed to protect the landscape and optimum use of its main components that are its natural and cultural features. Climate is a very important component to be identified natural landscape values. With done detailed analysis related to climate and evaluated these analysis using a measurable method can be produced optimum planning decisions. According to this study, Bartin, located in The West Black Sea Region, and its environs have been analyzed. Climate parameters related to study area such as rain, heat, humidity and wind was analyzed to have been used GIS software, ArcView 3.2. Obtained dataset have been evaluated used mathematical method.

Keywords:

Bartin, Landscape Features, Climate, Geographic Information Systems (GIS),

PDF

___

o Abelson, P.H. (1990), Medicine from plants, Science. 247:513.
o Adger, N., Brown, K., Cervigni, R. and Moran, D. (1994), Towards Estimating Total Economic Value of Forests in Mexico, CSERGE Working Paper. GEC 94-21.
o Bann, C. (1998), Turkey Forest Sector Review-Global Environment Overlays Program, Draft Report, WorldBank, Turkish Agency, Ankara.
o Bann, C. ve Clemens, M. (1998), Türkiye Ormancılık Sektör Incelemesi- Küresel Örtüşme Programı Final Raporu, Ankara.
o Bhagirathy, K. A. (2003), Valuation of Medicinal Plants: Unresolved Issues and Emerging Questions. South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics Newsletter, www.sandeeonline.org/newsletter/ downloadable_pdf/newsletter_6.pdf (10/10/2005).
o CBD (2001), The Value of Forest Ecosystems. Secreteriat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. CBD Technical Series no. 4, 67p., Montreal.
o Çevre Bakanlığı (1993), Birleşmiş Milletler Çevre ve Kalkınma Konferansı (UNCED). Çevre Bakanlığı Yayınları, Yeşil Seri 3, Ankara.
o Geray, U. (2000a), Kamu Malı Niteliğinin Önemi ve Su Yönetimi. Sürdürülebilir Orman Kaynakları Yönetimi Sempozyumu, Antalya.
o Geray, U. (2000b), Yeni Sömürü: Su Kaynakları. Orman Mühendisliği Dergisi, Yıl 37, No. 11.
o Geray (2005), Ormanlar ve Su Politikası. Haftanın Yazısı, Çekül Vakfı. http://www.cekulvakfi.org.tr (15.05.2005)
o Işık, K. (1998), Biyolojik Çeşitlilik, “Çevre ve İnsan”, Ünite 1-2, ss: 13-39, Anadolu Üniv. Açık Öğr. Fakültesi, Eskişehir.
o Kengen, S. (1997) Forest Valuation for Decision-Making. FAO, Rome.
o Mantau, U. (1996), Alternative Ways of Correcting Market Failure Product Structures-A Key to Marketability. Proceedings of International Symposium On The Non-Market Benefits of Forests, Edinburgh.
o Merlo, M. and Briales, E. R. (2000), Public Goods and Externalities Linked to Mediterranean Forests: Economic Nature and Policy. Land Use Policy, No. 17, pp.197-208.
o Merlo, M., Milocco, E., Panting, R. and Virgilietti, P. (2000), Transformation of Environmental Recreational Goods and Services Provided by Forestry Into Recreational Enviromental Products, Forest Policy and Economics, No. 1, pp.127-138. Oldfield, M.L. (1984), The Value of Conserving Genetic Resources. Publication of the U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service. Washington, D.C.
o Pearce, D. And Puroshothaman, S. (1992), Protecting Biological Diversity: The Economic Value of Pharmaceutical Plants. CSERGE Discussion Paper, GEC 92-27.
o Pearce, D. (1996), Can Non-Market Values Save The World’s Forests? Proceedings of Symposium on the Non-Market Benefits of Forests, ISBN. 0-11-710343-8, Edinburgh.
o Pearce, D. (2001), Valuing Biological Diversity: Issues and Overview. In Valuation of Biodiversity Benefits, Selected Studies, Chapter 2.OECD.
o Principe, P. (1989), The Economic Significance of Plants and their Constituents as Drugs. In Economic and Medical Plant Research (eds.) Wagner, H., Hakino, H. And Farnsworth, N. Academic Press, London.
o Principe, P. (1991), Monetizing the Pharmacological Benefits of Plants, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
o Reid, W. (1993), Biodiversity Prospecting: Using Genetic Resources for Sustainable Development. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.
o Rojas, M. and Alyward, B. (2003), What are we learning from experiences with markets for environmental services in Costa Rica? Areview and critique of the literature. Environmental Economics Programme, International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).
o Ruitenbeek, H.J. (1989), Social Cost Benefit Analysis of Komp Project., Cameroon, WWF Report, London.
o Simpson, D., Sedjo, R and Reid, J. (1994),. “Valuing Biodiversity: an Application to Genetic Prospecting”, Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper. 94-20, Washington DC.
o Simpson, D and Craft, A.. (1996), “The Social Value of Biodiversity in New Pharmaceutical Product Research”, Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 96-33, Washington DC.
o Toksoy, D., Gümüş, C. ve Ayyıldız, H. (2003), Türkiye’de Orman Kaynaklarının Durumu ve Tıbbi Bitkilerin Ticareti Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme, Orman ve Ekonomi Dergisi,Yıl 2, Sayı 8.
o Yeşilada, E. (2002), Biodiversity in Turkish Folk Medicine, In “Biodiversity: Biomolecular Aspects of Biodiversity and Innovative Utilization”. Ed. by B. Şener. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, London, p.119-135.