Wen-Jin CHEN, Li-Hua CHEN, Hong-Tian ZHANG, Kai SUN, Ru-Xiang XU

Microsurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma via Retrosigmoid Transmeatal Approach with Intraoperative Monitoring Techniques

Background: Functional preservation of cranial nerves remains an issue in surgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma. Aims: To explore the functional outcomes of vestibular schwannoma removed by microsurgery via a retrosigmoid transmeatal approach with intraoperative monitoring techniques. Study Design: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on a group of patients with vestibular schwannoma operated by microsurgery. Methods: The outcomes, including the extent of tumor removal, the anatomic positions of the facial nerve, and postoperative Karnofsky performance status score, facial nerve function, and hearing function were reviewed and were statistically compared among tumor sizes (small, medium, and giant) and intraoperative monitoring types [electrophysiological monitoring only (E), electrophysiological monitoring + intraoperative imaging examination (E+I), and electrophysiological monitoring + neuronavigation (E+N)]. Results: A total of 436 patients with VS received microsurgery. The position of the facial nerve was anterior in 85.5% of cases with small vestibular schwannoma. Other position patterns, especially anterior– superior and anterior–inferior, increased in tumors > 2.0 cm. Total resections were performed in all patients with small vestibular schwannoma. A total of 98.1% and 84.8% of patients with medium and giant vestibular schwannoma, respectively, had total resections. More than 90% of patients in all of the 3 monitoring groups had total resections. More than 80% of patients had excellent Karnofsky performance status score regardless of tumor size and monitoring type. After surgery, 100%, 84.4%, and 59.8% of patients with small-, medium-, and giant-sized vestibular schwannoma, respectively, had good facial nerve function. More than 70% of patients in all of the 3 monitoring groups had good facial nerve function postoperatively. The hearing preservation rate was 26.7% and 7.7% in small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannoma, respectively, and was 21.6% and 27.3% in the E group and the E+N group, respectively. The statistical analyses showed that tumor size was significantly associated with the extent of tumor resection, facial nerve localization, complications, postoperative Karnofsky performance status score, facial nerve function, and hearing function (all P ≤ .001). Monitoring type was significantly associated with the extent of resection (P ≤ .001). Additionally, patients in the E+N group had higher total resection rates than those in the E group (P ≤ .001). No cerebrospinal fluid leakage and surgery-related death occurred. Conclusion: In vestibular schwannoma microsurgery, tumor size is an important parameter that affects the localization of the facial nerve, the extent of resection, postoperative outcomes and complications. Intraoperative electrophysiological techniques combined with neuronavigation may be helpful to improve the extent of resection.

PDF

___

1. Rosahl S, Bohr C, Lell M, Hamm K, Iro H. Diagnostics and therapy of vestibular schwannomas - an interdisciplinary challenge. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;16:Doc03. [CrossRef]
2. Gal TJ, Shinn J, Huang B. Current epidemiology and management trends in acoustic neuroma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;142(5):677-681. [CrossRef]
3. Machinis TG, Fountas KN, Dimopoulos V, Robinson JS. History of acoustic neurinoma surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;18(4):e9. [CrossRef]
4. Rahimpour S, Friedman AH, Fukushima T, Zomorodi AR. Microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannomas: complication avoidance. J Neurooncol. 2016;130(2):367- 375. [CrossRef]
5. Sughrue ME, Kaur R, Rutkowski MJ, et al. Extent of resection and the long-term durability of vestibular schwannoma surgery. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(5):1218-1223. [CrossRef]
6. Gurgel RK, Dogru S, Amdur RL, Monfared A. Facial nerve outcomes after surgery for large vestibular schwannomas: do surgical approach and extent of resection matter? Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33(3):E16. [CrossRef]
7. Lin EP, Crane BT. The management and imaging of vestibular schwannomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(11):2034-2043. [CrossRef]
8. Strasilla C, Sychra V. Imaging-based diagnosis of vestibular schwannoma. [Bildgebende Diagnostik des Vestibularisschwannoms]. HNO. 2017;65(5):373-380. [CrossRef]
9. Xu X, Liang H, Zhang X, et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring to protect the facial nerve during microsurgery for large vestibular schwannomas. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2017;38(2):91-97)
10. Orringer DA, Golby A, Jolesz F. Neuronavigation in the surgical management of brain tumors: current and future trends. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012;9(5):491-500. [CrossRef]
11. Savardekar AR, Patra DP, Thakur JD, et al. Preoperative diffusion tensor imagingfiber tracking for facial nerve identification in vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review on its evolution and current status with a pooled data analysis of surgical concordance rates. Neurosurg Focus. 2018;44(3):E5. [CrossRef]
12. Samii A, Brinker T, Kaminsky J, Lanksch WR, Samii M. Navigation-guided opening of the internal auditory canal via the retrosigmoid route for acoustic neuroma surgery: cadaveric, radiological, and preliminary clinical study. Neurosurgery. 2000;47(2):382- 387; discussion 388. [CrossRef]
13. House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1985;93(2):146-147. [CrossRef]
14. Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma). American Academy of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, INC. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;113(3):179-180. [CrossRef]
15. Liu W, Ni M, Jia W, et al. How to address small- and medium-sized acoustic neuromas with hearing: A systematic review and decision analysis. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(2):283-291.e1. [CrossRef]
16. Lee HJ, Kim MJ, Koh SH, Chang WS, Moon IS. Comparing outcomes following salvage microsurgery in vestibular schwannoma patients failing gamma-knife radiosurgery or microsurgery. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38(9):1339-1344. [CrossRef]
17. Limb CJ, Long DM, Niparko JK. Acoustic neuromas after failed radiation therapy: challenges of surgical salvage. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(1):93-98. [CrossRef]
18. Carlson ML, Tveiten OV, Driscoll CL, et al. Long-term quality of life in patients with vestibular schwannoma: an international multicenter cross-sectional study comparing microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, observation, and nontumor controls. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(4):833-842. [CrossRef]
19. Kazim SF, Shamim MS, Enam SA, Bari ME. Microsurgical excisions of vestibular schwannomas: A tumor-size-based analysis of neurological outcomes and surgical complications. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:41. [CrossRef]
20. Zou P, Zhao L, Chen P, et al. Functional outcome and postoperative complications after the microsurgical removal of large vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach: a meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev. 2014;37(1):15-21. [CrossRef]
21. Sameshima T, Morita A, Tanikawa R, et al. Evaluation of variation in the course of the facial nerve, nerve adhesion to tumors, and postoperative facial palsy in acoustic neuroma. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2013;74(1):39-43. [CrossRef]
22. Mastronardi L, Cacciotti G, Roperto R, et al. Position and course of facial nerve and postoperative facial nerve results in vestibular schwannoma microsurgery. World Neurosurg. 2016 ;94:174-180. [CrossRef]
23. Sampath P, Rini D, Long DM. Microanatomical variations in the cerebellopontine angle associated with vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): a retrospective study of 1006 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg. 2000;92(1):70-78. [CrossRef]
24. Chen LL, YS., Chen L. et al. Operative microsurgical anatomy of large acoustic neuromas. Chin J Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2004;9(11):495-498. in Chinese.
25. Rabelo de Freitas M, Russo A, Sequino G, Piccirillo E, Sanna M. Analysis of hearing preservation and facial nerve function for patients undergoing vestibular schwannoma surgery: the middle cranial fossa approach versus the retrosigmoid approach--personal experience and literature review. Audiol Neurootol. 2012;17(2):71-81. [CrossRef]
26. Jacob A, Robinson LL, Jr, Bortman JS, et al. Nerve of origin, tumor size, hearing preservation, and facial nerve outcomes in 359 vestibular schwannoma resections at a tertiary care academic center. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(12):2087-2092. [CrossRef]
27. Ansari SF, Terry C, Cohen-Gadol AA. Surgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review of complications by approach. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33(3):E14. [CrossRef]
28. Huang X, Xu J, Xu M, et al. Functional outcome and complications after the microsurgical removal of giant vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach: a retrospective review of 16-year experience in a single hospital. BMC Neurol. 2017;17(1):18. [CrossRef]
29. Kari E, Friedman RA. Hearing preservation: microsurgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 October;20(5):358-366. [CrossRef]
30. Oh T, Nagasawa DT, Fong BM, et al. Intraoperative neuromonitoring techniques in the surgical management of acoustic neuromas. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33(3):E6. [CrossRef]