Early Experience with Salvage Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Proton Beam Radiotherapy Failures

Early Experience with Salvage Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Proton Beam Radiotherapy Failures

Aims: To assess the perioperative and short-term functional and oncologic outcomes of the salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (sRARP), after recurrence following primary proton beam therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Methods: Ten patients undergoing sRARP after failure of the prior definitive proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer were included. BCR is defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value of 2.0 ng/mL greater than the absolute nadir. All of the individuals had a diagnosis of prostate cancer via biopsy after proton beam therapy, with negative findings on magnetic resonance imaging/computer tomography of the pelvis and abdomen, and a bone scan. The sRARP procedure with pelvic lymph node dissection was performed by a single surgeon in all patients. Results: The median age of the cohort at sRARP was 66.8 years, and the mean BMI was 29.2 kg/m2 . The mean duration from proton beam therapy to sRARP was 58.4 months; the mean preoperative PSA level was 5.5 ng/mL, the mean operative time was 230 minutes, and the approximate blood loss was 745 mL. Anastomotic leakage occurred in half of the individuals, and bladder neck contracture developed in 6 patients. For 8 patients, the continence results within 6 months followup were available. Overall, 24 complications occurred in 9 patients. At follow-up in the 32nd month, the overall survival rate was 80%, and the BCR-free survival rate was 90%. Conclusion: sRARP after proton beam therapy is an applicable procedure, but has a high risk of serious complications.

___

  • 1. Jang JW, Drumm MR, Efstathiou JA, et al. Long-term quality of life after definitive treatment for prostate cancer: patient-reported outcomes in the second posttreatment decade. Cancer Med. 2017;6:1827-1836. [CrossRef]
  • 2. Burt LM, Shrieve DC, Tward JD. Factors influencing prostate cancer patterns of care: an analysis of treatment variation using the SEER database. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018;3:170-180. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Agarwal PK, Sadetsky N, Konety BR, et al. Treatment failure after primary and salvage therapy for prostate cancer: likelihood, patterns of care, and outcomes. Cancer. 2008;112:307-314. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Chade DC, Eastham J, Graefen M, et al. Cancer control and functional outcomes of salvage radical prostatectomy for radiation-recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2012;61:961-971. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Abufaraj M, SiyamA, Ali MR, et al. Functional outcomes after local salvage therapies for radiation-recurrent prostate cancer patients: a systematic review. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1051-1060. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Acar O, Esen T. Robotic radical prostatectomy in patients with previous prostate surgery and radiotherapy. Prostate Cancer. 2014;2014:367675. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Gontero P, Marra G, Alessio P, et al. Salvage radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer: morbidity and functional outcomes from a large multicenter series of open versus robotic approaches. J Urol. 2019;202:725-731. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Onol FF, Bhat S, Moschovas M, et al. Comparison of outcomes of salvage robotassisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for post-primary radiation vs focal therapy. BJU Int. 2020;125:103-111. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Kenney PA, Nawaf CB, Mustafa M, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open salvage radical prostatectomy following radiotherapy. Can J Urol. 2016;23: 8271-8277.
  • 11. Kamran SC, D'Amico AV. Radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2020;34:45-69. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Sheets NC, Goldin GH, Meyer AM, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, proton therapy, or conformal radiation therapy and morbidity and disease control in localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2012;307:1611-1620. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Dearnaley DP, Jovic G, Syndikus I, et al. Escalated-dose versus control-dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: long-term results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:464-473. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Iwata H, Ishikawa H, Takagi M, et al. Long-term outcomes of proton therapy for prostate cancer in japan: a multi-institutional survey of the Japanese radiation oncology study group. Cancer Med. 2018;7:677-689. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Trofimov A, Nguyen PL, Coen JJ, et al. Radiotherapy treatment of early-stage prostate cancer with IMRT and protons: a treatment planning comparison. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:444-453. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Vargas C, Fryer A, Mahajan C, et al. Dose-volume comparison of proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70:744-751. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Rossi CJ, Sung Kim Jr Re, Shunhua S, et al. Late gastrointestinal toxicities following radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2011;60:908-916.
  • 18. Dindo D, Hahnloser D, Clavien PA. Quality assessment in surgery: riding a lame horse. Ann Surg. 2010;251:766-771. [CrossRef]
  • 19. Zargar H, Lamb AD, Rocco B, et al. Salvage robotic prostatectomy for radio recurrent prostate cancer: technical challenges and outcome analysis. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017;69:26-37. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Calleris G, Marra G, Dalmasso E, et al. Is it worth to perform salvage radical prostatectomy for radio-recurrent prostate cancer? A literature review. World J Urol. 2019;37:1469-1483. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Artibani W, Porcaro AB, De Marco V, Cerruto MA, Siracusano S. Management of biochemical recurrence after primary curative treatment for prostate cancer: a review. Urol Int. 2018;100:251-262. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Bates AS, Samavedi S, Kumar A, et al. Salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity matched study of perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:1540-1546. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Gotto GT, Yunis LH, Vora K, et al. Impact of prior prostate radiation on complications after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2010;184:136-142. [CrossRef]
  • 24. Mohler JL, Halabi S, Ryan ST, et al. Management of recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy: long-term results from CALGB 9687 (Alliance), a prospective multiinstitutional salvage prostatectomy series. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019;22:309-316. [CrossRef]
  • 25. Devos B, Al Hajj Obeid W, Andrianne C, et al. Salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound versus salvage radical prostatectomy for radiation-recurrent prostate cancer: a comparative study of oncological, functional, and toxicity outcomes. World J Urol. 2019;37:1507-1515. [CrossRef]
  • 26. Golbari NM, Katz AE. Salvage therapy options for local prostate cancer recurrence after primary radiotherapy: a literature review. Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18:63. [CrossRef]
  • 27. Eandi JA, Link BA, Nelson RA, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic salvage prostatectomy for radiation resistant prostate cancer. J Urol. 2010;183:133-137. [CrossRef]
  • 28. Yuh B, Ruel N, Muldrew S, et al. Complications and outcomes of salvage robotassisted radical prostatectomy: a single-institution experience. BJU Int. 2014;113: 769-776. [CrossRef]
  • 29. Paganetti H, Niemierko A, Ancukiewicz M, et al. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53: 407-421. [CrossRef]
  • 30. Kaffenberger SD, Keegan KA, Bansal NK, et al. Salvage robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution, 5-year experience. J Urol. 2013;189: 507-513. [CrossRef]
Balkan Medical Journal-Cover
  • ISSN: 2146-3123
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Erkan Mor
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Early Experience with Salvage Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Proton Beam Radiotherapy Failures

Yaşar BOZKURT, Murat ATAR, Louis L. PISTERS

Clinical Outcomes and Independent Risk Factors for 90-Day Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Respiratory Failure Infected with SARS-CoV-2: A Multicenter Study in Turkish Intensive Care Units

Neriman Defne ALTINTAŞ, Cenk KIRAKLI, Begüm ERGAN, Sema SARI, Gülseren ELAY, Kürşat GÜNDOĞAN, Recep Civan YÜKSEL, Şahin TEMEL, Murat SUNGUR, Emre KARAKOÇ, Avşar ZERMAN, İsmail Hakkı AKBUDAK, Nuri TUTAR, İrem AKIN ŞEN, Jale Bengi ÇELİK, Jülide ERGİL, Arzu TOPELİ, Esma EREN, Kemal Tolga SARAÇOĞLU, Emr

Comparison of PD-L1, EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 Status Between Surgical Samples and Cytological Samples in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Zübeyde EKİN, Ali VERAL, Deniz NART, Pınar SAVAŞ

Genetic and Clinical Characterization of Patients with Maturity-Onset of Diabetes of the Young (MODY): Identification of Novel Variations

Onur ELBASAN, Tuğçe APAYDIN, Esra ARSLAN ATEŞ, Özlem ÜSTAY, Hamza POLAT, Özlem YILDIRIM, Ahmet İlter GÜNEY

Page Kidney: A Rare Cause of Resistant Hypertension Early After Renal Transplantation

Erol DEMİR, Halil YAZICI, Özgür Akın OTO, Ahmet Burak DİRİM

New-Onset ANCA-Associated Vasculitis in a Patient with SARS-COV2

Claudia COBILINSCHI, Cristian COBILINSCHI, Alexandra CONSTANTINESCU, Juliana DRANICENAU, Ruxandra IONESCU

Multiple Publications From the Same Dataset: Is It Acceptable?

Zafer KOÇAK, Servet ALTAY

Comparison of BPAP S/T and Average Volume-Assured Pressure Support Modes for Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Başak BAYRAM, Emre ŞANCI, Nurfer Zehra GÖREN, Feride Fulya ERCAN COŞKUN, Duygu GÜRSOYLU

A Promising, Novel Radiosensitizer Nanodrug Complex for Oral Cavity Cancer: Cetuximab and Cisplatin-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles

Gizem ÇALIBAŞI KOCAL, Ezgi DAŞKIN, Yasemin BAŞBINAR, Görkem ESKİİZMİR, Kerim YAPICI, Zümre ARICAN ALICIKUŞ, Tarık Buğra ELÇİTEPE, Doğukan AKÇAY, Şeniz İNANÇ SÜRER

Effects of the Rho/Rho-Kinase Pathway on Perfusion Pressure in the Isolated-Perfused Rat Hind Limb Vascular Bed

Nalan TİFTİK, Kansu BÜYÜKAFŞAR, Esra İLHAN, M. Ata SEÇİLMİŞ, Zayed ALZAYED