Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test

Background: Spoken word recognition and speech perception tests in quiet are being used as a routine in assessment of the benefit which children and adult cochlear implant users receive from their devices. Cochlear implant users generally demonstrate high level performances in these test materials as they are able to achieve high level speech perception ability in quiet situations. Although these test materials provide valuable information regarding Cochlear Implant (CI) users' performances in optimal listening conditions, they do not give realistic information regarding per-formances in adverse listening conditions, which is the case in the everyday environment.Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the speech intelligibility performance of post lingual CI users in the presence of noise at different signal-to-noise ratio with the Matrix Test developed for Turkish language.Study Design: Cross-sectional study.Methods: The thirty post lingual implant user adult subjects, who had been using implants for a minimum of one year, were evaluated with Turkish Matrix test. Subjects' speech intelligibility was measured using the adaptive and non-adaptive Matrix Test in quiet and noisy environments.Results: The results of the study show a correlation between Pure Tone Average (PTA) values of the subjects and Matrix test Speech Reception Thresh-old (SRT) values in the quiet. Hence, it is possible to asses PTA values of CI users using the Matrix Test also. However, no correlations were found be-tween Matrix SRT values in the quiet and Matrix SRT values in noise. Similarly, the correlation be-tween PTA values and intelligibility scores in noise was also not significant. Therefore, it may not be possible to assess the intelligibility performance of CI users using test batteries performed in quiet conditions.Conclusion: The Matrix Test can be used to assess the benefit of CI users from their systems in every-day life, since it is possible to perform intelligibility test with the Matrix test using a material that CI us-ers experience in their everyday life and it is possible to assess their difficulty in speech discrimination in noisy conditions they have to cope with.

PDF

___

Kilman L, Zekveld A, Hallgren M, Ronnberg J. Native and non-native speech perception by hearing-impaired liste- ners in noise- and speech maskers. Trends Hear [Internet]. 2015;24:19. Available from: http://tia.sagepub.com/cgi/ doi/10.1177/2331216515579127. [CrossRef]
Faulkner KF, Pisoni DB. Some observations about cochlear implants: challenges and future directions. Neurosci Discov [In- ternet]. 2013;1:9. Available from: http://www.hoajonline.com/ neuroscience/2052-6946/1/9
Kordus M, Tyler RS, Zera J, Oleson JJ. An Influence of directional microphones on the speech intelligibility and spatial perception by cochlear implant users. Arch Acoust [Internet]. 2015;1:40(1). Available from: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/aoa.2015.40. issue-1/aoa-2015-0010/aoa-2015-0010.xml [CrossRef]
Wimmer W, Weder S, Caversaccio M, Kompis M. Speech intel- ligibility in noise with a Pinna effect imitating Cochlear implant processor. Otol Neurotol [Internet]. 2015 Sep;1. Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:la ndingpage&an=00129492-900000000-97507
Hu W, Swanson BA, Heller GZ. A statistical method for the analysis of speech intelligibility tests. Li L, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2015 Jul 6;10:e0132409. Available from: http:// dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132409
Cervera T, González-Alvarez J. Test of Spanish sentences to measure speech intelligibility in noise conditions. Behav Res Methods [Internet]. 2011 17;43:459-67. Available from: http:// www.springerlink.com/index/10.3758/s13428-011-0063-2. [CrossRef]
Puglisi GE, Warzybok A, Hochmuth S, Visentin C, Astolfi A, Prodi N, et al. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol [Internet]. 2015 May 15;54(sup2):44-50. Available from: http://www.fa2014. agh.edu.pl/fa2014_cd/article/RS/R03C_6.pdf
Kollmeier B, Warzybok A, Hochmuth S, Zokoll M, Uslar VN, Brand T, et al. The multilingual matrix test: principles, applica- tions and comparison across languages: a review. Int J Audiol [Internet]. 2015 May 18;54(sup2):3-16. Available from:
Zokoll MA, Hochmuth S, Fidan D, Wagener KC, Ergenç İ, Koll- meier B. Speech intelligibility tests for the Turkish language. In: 15th Annual Conference of the German Audiology Society. Erlangen/Germany; 2012. p.138.
Houben R, Dreschler WA. Optimization of the Dutch matrix test by random selection of sentences from a preselected subset. Trends Hear [Internet]. 2015 May 11;19. Available from: http://tia.sage- pub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/2331216515583138. [CrossRef]
Zokoll MA, Fidan D, Türkyılmaz D, Hochmuth S, Ergenç İ, Sennaroğlu G, et al. Development and evaluation of the Tur- kish matrix sentence test. Int J Audiol [Internet]. 2015 May 7;54(sup2):51-61. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/ doi/full/10.3109/14992027.2015.1074735
Wagener K, Kühne V, Kollmeier B. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache I: Design des Oldenbur- ger Satztests. Z Audiol 1999;38:4-15.
Wimmer W, Caversaccio M, Kompis M. Speech intelligibility in noise with a single-unit cochlear implant audio processor. Otol Neurotol 2015;36:1197-202. [CrossRef]
Hey M, Hocke T, Hedderich J, Müller-Deile J. Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discriminati- on function in cochlear implant patients. Int J Audiol [Internet]. 2014;53:895-902. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/ doi/full/10.3109/14992027.2014.938368. [CrossRef]
Dietz A, Buschermöhle M, Aarnisalo AA, Vanhanen A, Hyyrynen T, Aaltonen O, et al. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility as- sessment. Acta Otolaryngol 2014;134: 728-37. [CrossRef]