Kavunda solgunluk ve kök çürüklüğü ile mücadelede kemigasyon

Bu çalışma kavunda (Cucumis melo cv. Edalı) toprak kökenli fungal patojenlerle (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis, Macrophomina phaseoli) mücadelede kemigasyon metodunun verim, fungusit kullanım etkinliği (FUE) ve ekonomisi üzerine etkisini belirlemek için yürütülmüştür. Deneme tesadüf blokları deneme deseninde ve 4 tekerrürlü olarak hastalığın doğal olarak bulaşık olduğu çiftçi tarlasında Konya–Çumra ekolojik koşullarında kurulmuştur. Deneme uygulamalarını farklı etken maddeli 2 fungusitin (Fludioxonil+Metalaxyl–M–F1 ve Hymexazol–F2) kemigasyon yolu ile uygulanması, geleneksel mücadele ve ilaçsız uygulama oluşturmuştur. Fungusit uygulaması kemigasyon metoduyla dikimle birlikte ve 15 gün sonra yapılırken, geleneksel uygulama ise püskürtme şeklinde dikimden 15 gün sonra yapılmıştır. Her iki yılda da, kemigasyon yolu ile ilaçlama verim ve toprak kökenli patojenlerle mücadelede hem kontrol hem de geleneksel mücadeleden daha iyi sonuç vermiştir. En yüksek verim (1.97–2.66 t da–1) her iki yılda da F1 uygulamasından elde edilmiştir (p<0.01). Ayrıca ekonomik analiz sonuçlarına göre de uygulamalar arasında önemli farklılıklar bulunmuştur. En fazla hektara net gelir F1 uygulamasından 1 419 ₺ olarak elde edilmiştir.

Chemigation for fusarium wilt and root rot management on melon

This research was carried out to determine the effectiveness of chemigation method on yield, fungicide use efficiency (FUE) and net return of melon (Cucumis melo cv. Edalı) in combating soil–borne fungal pathogens (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis and Macrophomina phaseoli). The experiment was conducted in a naturally infested field as in the randomized blocks design with four replications in Konya–Çumra, Turkey, ecological conditions. The experimental plots consisted of chemigation with different active ingredient (Fludioxonil+Metalaxyl–M–F1 and Hymexazol–F2), traditional application and no fungicide. While fungicide applications with chemigation method were made two times including together with planting and 15 days after planting, traditional practice was made once on 15th day after planting by spraying. Every two years, management through chemigation on yield and the fight aganist soil–borne pathogen gave better results than both control and traditional combat. The highest yield (1.97–2.66 t da–1, respectively) was obtained from F1 applications. Besides, according to net return, there were significantly differences among the treatments. The maximum net income was obtained from F1 treatment that were ₺ 1 419 ha–1.

___

  • Abbott, W. S., 1925. A Method of Computing the Effectiveness of an Insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology. (18):265–268.
  • Anonim, 2005. Türkiye Toprakları Kirlilik Kontrol Yönetmeliği. (Resmi Gazete: 31.05.200) (http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr)
  • Anonim, 2012. Tarımsal Yapı ve Üretim. (http://www.tuik.gov.tr)
  • Brennman, T. B., H. R. Sumner and G. W. Harrison, 1990. Deposition and Retention of Chlorothalonil Applied to Peanut Foliage: Effects of Application Methods, Fungicide Formulations and Oil Additives. Peanut Science 17:80–84.
  • Csinos, A. S., A. W. Jonhson and A. M. Golden, 1986. Metalaxyl and Fenamiphos Applied Through Irrigation Water to Control Black Shank/Root–Rot Complex on Tabacco. Plant Disease. 70:210–213.
  • Forster, R. L. and R. G. Samson, 1984. Control of White Mold of Dry Beans by Fungicides Applied Via Sprinkler Irrigation. Annual Report Bean Improvement Cooperative 27:106. 1994.
  • İnan, İ. H., 2001. Tarım Ekonomisi ve İşletmeciliği. T. Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Öğrencileri İçin Hazırlanmış Ders Kitabı. 5. Baskı. Yayın Kodu: ISBN 975–93281–0–0. Tekirdağ. Baskı: Avcı Ofset, İstanbul.
  • James, L. G., 1988. Principles of Farm Irrigation System Design. John Wiley and Sons. Inc, New York, p.543.
  • Koike, S. T., K. V. Subbarao, R. M. Davis and T. A. Turini, 2003. Vegetable Disease Caused by Soil Borne Pathogens. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Commercial Greenhouse Vegetable Handbook, Publication 21575, 1–13.
  • Özbahce, A., 2014. Chemigation for Soil–Borne Pathogen Management on Melon Growth under Drought Stress. Australasian Plant Pathology. 43(3):299–306.
  • Potter, H. S. and C. L. Schneider, 1981. Control of Rhizoctonia Crown Rot Diseases of Sugarbeet With Fungicides Applied by Sprinkler Irrigation. Journal American Society Sugar Beet Technology 21:50–55.
  • Singleton, L. L., J. D. Mihail and C. M. Rush, 1992. Methods for Research on Soilborn Phytopathogenic Fungi. The American Phytopathological Society. pp. 115–128 and 157–165.
  • Sumner, D. R. and R. H. Littrell, 1989. Effects of Chemigation With Clorothalonil and Diniconazole on Soil Fungi and Pod, Peg and Stem Disease of Peanut. The American Phytopathological Society, Plant Disease, 73(8):642–646.
  • Vieira, R., C. M. F. Pinto and T. J. P. Junior, 2003. Chemigation with Benomyl and Fluazinam and Their Fungicidal Effects in Soil for White Mold Control on Dry Beans. Fitopatologia Braileira, 28(3):245–250.
  • Vieira, R. F. and D. S. Sumner, 1999. Application of Fungicides to Foliage Through Overhead Sprinkler Irrigation a Review. Pesticide Science 53:412–422.
  • Vural, H., D. Eşiyok ve İ. Duman, 2000. Kültür Sebzeleri. Ege Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, ISBN: 975–97190–0–2.
  • Yang, X. B., G. G. Ying and R. S. Kookana, 2010. Rapid Multi Residue Determination for Currently Used Pesticides in Agricultural Drainage Waters and Soils Using Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B 45:152–161.
  • Yetisir, H., N. Sarı, İ. Solmaz, H. Ekiz and S. Yücel, 2010. New Fusarium wilt Resistant Melon (Cucumis melo var. cantalupensis) Varieties Developed by Dihaploidization: Sari F1, Yetisir F1, Solmaz F1, Emin F1 and Yucel F1. Acta Hort. 871:267–272.
  • Yurtsever, N., 1984. Deneysel İstatistik Metotlar. (Mülga) Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü Toprak ve Gübre Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Yayın No: 121, Teknik Yayın No: 56, Ankara.
  • Yücel, S., H. Pala, N. Sarı and K. Abak, 1994. Determination of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis Races in the East Mediterranean Region of Turkey and Response of Some Melon Genotypes to the Disease. 9th Congress of the Mediterranean Phytopathological Union, September 18–24, 1994, Kuşadası–Aydın, Türkiye, 87–89.