Urban regulations in 18th century Istanbul: Natural disasters and public dispute

As a part of the Ottoman modernization process, new regulations and institutions for urban management started to be established in Istanbul. This paper handles the 18th century as an initial period for these urban reforms and studies how the built environment was regulated at the time. The regulations of 18th century which were based on the occasion of natural disasters and public dispute will be evaluated via official archive documents and narratives.18th century Istanbul’s general urban fabric was formed with organic narrow streets and small timber houses. With the ethno-religious diversity embedded to this picture, the city had a complex and fragile character. Numerous fires causing massive destructions raised a need for precautions. Several orders related to construction systems, building height, size of building elements like eaves and projections were issued. On the other hand, the fact that urban constituents like ownership were not defined clearly in the modern sense made public dispute very common. Apart from the complexity of the built environment, most of the conflicts arose from the social structure of Istanbul which was comprised of various ethno-religious groups. There was a clear distinction of Muslims and non-Muslims in the urban realm as they had different building regulations, until the issuing of the Tanzimat Firman.The regulations of the 18th century was based on cases, rather than being comprehensive generalized rules for the urban fabric and thus had a more proscriptive nature rather than prescriptive

PDF

___

Alt1nay, A. R. (1988a). Hicri On Birinci Asırda İstanbul Hayatı, Istanbul: Enderun Kitabevi.

Altınay, A. R. (1988b). Hicri On İkinci Asırda İstanbul Hayatı (1100-1200), Istanbul: Enderun Kitabevi.

Aykut, Ş. N. Prepared by (2006). Şer’iyye Sicillerine Göre İstanbul Tarihi: İstanbul Mahkemesi 121 Numaralı Şer’iyye Sicili. Istanbul: Sabancı Üniver— sitesi Yayınları.

Baer, M. D. (2004). “The Great Fire of 1660 and the Islamization of Christian and Jewish Space in Istanbul”, İnternational Journal ofMiddle East Stud— ies, 36(2), 159-181.

Bozkurt, G. (1989). Alman-İngiliz Belgelerinin ve Siyasi Gelişmelerin Işığı Altında: Gayrimüslim Osmanlı Vatan— daşlarının Hukuki Durumu (1839- 1914), Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi.

D’Ohsson, M. I. (1788—1791). Tab— leaü General de l’Empire Othoman, Paris: Imprimerie de Monsieur. Eldem, S. H. (1969). Köşkler ve Kasırlar, Istanbul: Devlet Güzel San— atlar Akademisi Yüksek Mimarlık Bölümü Rölöve Kürsüsü.

Ergin, 0. N. (1995). Mecelle-i Umar-i Belediyye, Istanbul: IBB Kültür İşleri Daire Başkanlığı Yayınları.

Gül, M., Lamb, R. (2004). Mapping, Regularizing, and Modernizing Ottoman İstanbul: Aspects of the Genesis of the 1839 Development Policy, Urban History, 31, 420-436.

Kayra, C. (2008). Osmanlı’da Fetva— lar ve Günlük Yaşam, Istanbul: Boyut. Kuban, D. (1996). Istanbul: An Ur— ban History, Istanbul: The Economic and Social History Foundation of Tur— key.

Mazlum, D. (2011). 1766 Istanbul Depremi, Istanbul: Istanbul Araştırma Enstitüsü.

Özcan, K. (2006). “Tanzimat’ın Kent Reformları: Türk Imar Sisteminin Ku— ruluş Sürecinde Erken Plânlama Dene— yimleri (1839—1908)”, Osmanlı Bilimi Araştırmaları, VII/2, 149-180.

Tanyeli, U. (1992). Transfer of Wes— 193

tern Urban Planning Concepts and Techniques to Turkey (1718-1840), İh— sanoğlu, E. (Ed.) Transfer of Modern Science Technology to the Muslim World, Istanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi, 345-363.

Tekeli, I. (1999). 19. Yüzyılda İstan— bul Metropol Alanının Dönüşümü, Modernleşme Sürecinde Osmanlı Kentleri, P. Dumont, F. Georgeon (Eds), İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, 19-31.

Yerasimos, S. (1999). Tanzimat’ın Kent Reformları Üzerine, Modernleş- me Sürecinde Osmanlı Kentleri, P. Du— mont, F. Georgeon (Eds), İstanbul: Ta— rih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, 1—18.