The article explores the impact of colonial urban planning on the temporal dynamics of the colonized people. This is discussed using the city of East Jerusa- lem as a colonized city, and the area of Kufr Aqab, located within the municipal boundaries but outside the Separation Wall, as a case-study. The article argues that the use of the spatial policy of colonial urban planning affects the daily lives of the colonized people not only spatially but also temporally and in different ways. The methodology is both qualitative and quantitative, and based on Elliott Jaques’s theory on the “Form of Time” taking into consideration what he identifies as the axis of succession and the axis of intention of time. These axes are reflected in the succession of time episodes as well as the intentions of the people, thus showing the effect of how the past, present and future are perceived. This is supported by quantitative analyses of a questionnaire of a sample of 284 people from Kufr Aqab in East Jerusalem. The article explains how colonial policies deeply affect the temporal dynamics of the daily lives of the colonized people, creating loops of temporal episodes that affect the essence of perception of time, its organization and management, as well as their adopted life style. "> [PDF] Axis of succession and axis of intention of time: Unpacking temporal dynamics of colonial space in Jerusalem | [PDF] Axis of succession and axis of intention of time: Unpacking temporal dynamics of colonial space in Jerusalem The article explores the impact of colonial urban planning on the temporal dynamics of the colonized people. This is discussed using the city of East Jerusa- lem as a colonized city, and the area of Kufr Aqab, located within the municipal boundaries but outside the Separation Wall, as a case-study. The article argues that the use of the spatial policy of colonial urban planning affects the daily lives of the colonized people not only spatially but also temporally and in different ways. The methodology is both qualitative and quantitative, and based on Elliott Jaques’s theory on the “Form of Time” taking into consideration what he identifies as the axis of succession and the axis of intention of time. These axes are reflected in the succession of time episodes as well as the intentions of the people, thus showing the effect of how the past, present and future are perceived. This is supported by quantitative analyses of a questionnaire of a sample of 284 people from Kufr Aqab in East Jerusalem. The article explains how colonial policies deeply affect the temporal dynamics of the daily lives of the colonized people, creating loops of temporal episodes that affect the essence of perception of time, its organization and management, as well as their adopted life style. ">

Axis of succession and axis of intention of time: Unpacking temporal dynamics of colonial space in Jerusalem

Axis of succession and axis of intention of time: Unpacking temporal dynamics of colonial space in Jerusalem

The article explores the impact of colonial urban planning on the temporal dynamics of the colonized people. This is discussed using the city of East Jerusa- lem as a colonized city, and the area of Kufr Aqab, located within the municipal boundaries but outside the Separation Wall, as a case-study. The article argues that the use of the spatial policy of colonial urban planning affects the daily lives of the colonized people not only spatially but also temporally and in different ways. The methodology is both qualitative and quantitative, and based on Elliott Jaques’s theory on the “Form of Time” taking into consideration what he identifies as the axis of succession and the axis of intention of time. These axes are reflected in the succession of time episodes as well as the intentions of the people, thus showing the effect of how the past, present and future are perceived. This is supported by quantitative analyses of a questionnaire of a sample of 284 people from Kufr Aqab in East Jerusalem. The article explains how colonial policies deeply affect the temporal dynamics of the daily lives of the colonized people, creating loops of temporal episodes that affect the essence of perception of time, its organization and management, as well as their adopted life style.

___

  • Abujidi, N. (2014). Urbicide in Pal- estine: Spaces of Oppression and Resil- ience. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
  • Allabadi, F. & Hardan, T. (2016). Marriage, Split Residency, and the Sep- aration Wall in Jerusalem. Jerusalem Quarterly 65, 6-85.
  • ARIJ- The Applied Research Insti- tute- Jerusalem. (2012). Kafr Aqab Vil- lage Profile. Retrieved from ARIJ: http:// citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/down- load?doi=10.1.1.692.7470&rep=rep1&- type=pdf.
  • Celik, Z. (1997). Urban Forms and Colonial Confrontations: Algiers un- der French Rule. Berkeley: University of California Press. Retrieved from: http://arkcdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft8c- 6009jk/.
  • Davis, U. (2003). Apartheid Isra- el: Possibilities for the Struggle Within. London, UK: Zed Books.
  • De Gans, H. (1994). Breaking into Time? Problems of Time in Demo- graphic Forecasting, in Vilquin, E. (ed.) Le Temps et la demographie. Chaire
  • Quetelet 1993, Louvain-la-Neuve: Aca- demia/L’Harmattan, 329–358.
  • Dolphin, R. (2006). The West Bank Wall: Unmaking Palestine. London: Pluto Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1981). A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, Lon- don: Macmillan.
  • Halper, J. (2008). An Israeli in Pales- tine Resisting Dispossession, Redeeming Israel. London: Pluto Press in Associ- ation with ICAHD (The Israeli Com- mittee against House Demolitions).
  • Hammoudeh, D., Hamayel, L. & Welchman, L. (2016). Beyond the Phys- icality of Space: East Jerusalem, Kufr ‘Aqab, and the Politics of Everyday Suf- fering. Journal of Palestine Studies 65: 35-50, Retrieved from: https://www. palestine-studies.org/en/node/198346.
  • Heidegger, M. (1953). Being and Time. New York: State University of New York.
  • Hosagrahar, J. (2005). Indigenous Modernities: Negotiating Architecture and Urbanism. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Jaques, E. (1982). The Form of Time. USA: Crane, Russak & Company.
  • Jaques, E. (2002). The Life and Be- havior of Living Organisms: A General Theory. USA: Praeger Publishers.
  • King, A. (1976). Colonial Urban Development: Culture, Social Power and Environment. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Kusno, A. (2000). Behind the Post- colonial Architecture: Urban Space and Political Cultures in Indonesia. New York: Routledge.
  • Legg, S. (2007). Spaces of Colonial- ism Delhi’s Urban Governmentalities. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Liang, L. Anyang, H. Biderman, A. Ratti, C. & Chen, J. (2009). Un- derstanding individual and collective mobility patterns from smart card records: a case study in Shenzhen, in Proceedings of the 12th interna- tional IEEE conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 3–7 Octo- ber, St. Louis, MO, 1–6, doi: 10.1109/ ITSC.2009.5309662.
  • Mir, MS. Krishna Rao, KV. & Hunt, JD. (2010). Space Development Mod- eling of Urban Regions in Developing Countries. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 136(1) March, ASCE.
  • Munizaga, MA. & Palma, C. (2012). Estimation of a disaggregate multi- modal public transport origin–desti- nation matrix from passive smartcard data from Santiago, Chile. Transpor- tation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 24: 9-18, doi:10.1016/j. trc.2012.01.007.
  • OCHA-OPT- United Nations Of- fice for the Coordination of Humani- tarian Affairs (2017). West Bank- East Jerusalem: key humanitarian concerns. Retrieved from: https://www.ochaopt. org/content/west-bank-east-jerusa- lem-key-humanitarian-concerns.
  • Pappe, I. (2007). The Ethnic Cleans- ing of Palestine. England: Oneworld Publications Limited.
  • Parera, N. (1988). Society and Space: Colonialism, Nationalism, and Postco- lonial Identity in SriLanka. Colorado and Oxford: Westview Press.
  • Park, JY. Kim, DJ. & Lim, Y. (2008). Use of smart card data to define pub- lic transit use in Seoul, South Korea, Transportation Research Record. Jour- nal of the Transportation Research Board 2063(1), 3–9, doi:10.3141/2063-01. Rakodi, C. (1995). Harare- Inherit- ing a Colonial Settler State: Change or Continuity. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd
  • Rao, AM. & Roa, KR. (2012). Mea- suring Urban Traffic Congestion- A Review. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering 2(4), 286– 305, doi: 10.7708/ijtte.2012.2(4).01.
  • Rodinson, M. (1973). Israel: A Co- lonial Settler State. New York: Monad Press.
  • Saifi, Y. and Samman, M. (2019). Housing in Jerusalem: From A Flour- ishing Hope to Slow Urbicide, Open House International (44), 2, 27-35.
  • Samman, M. (2013) Trans-Colonial Urban Space in Palestine: Politics and Development. USA and Canada: Rout- ledge.
  • Samman, M. (2018). The Produc- tion of Colonial Temporal Patterns in East Jerusalem, Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies (17), May, 59-74.
  • United Nations. (2012). United Nations Rio de Janeiro Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio+20. Re- trieved from UN: https://sdgs.un.org/ goals.
  • United Nations. (2012)a. United Na- tions Conference on Sustainable Devel- opment, Rio+20 Retrieved from UN: https://sustainabledevelopment. un- .org/rio20.
  • Veracini, L. (2006). Israel and Settler Society. London: Pluto Press.
  • Weizman, E. (2007). Hollow Land: Israel’s Architecture of Occupation. Lon- don and New York: Verso.
  • Whitehead, AN. (1926). Process and Reality. New York: Free Press.
  • Wolfe, P (2006). Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native. Jour- nal of Genocide Research 8(4): 387-409.
  • Yeoh, B. (2003). Contesting Space in Colonial Singapore: Power Relations And the Built Environment. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
  • Yiftachel, O. (2003). Settlements as reflex action, in Segal, R. & Weizman, E. (eds.) A Civilian Occupation: The Politics of Israeli Architecture. Tel Aviv, Babel, London and New York: Verso, pp. 32–36.
  • Zhong C. Arisona SM. Huang, X. Batty, M. & Schmitt, G. (2014). Detect- ing the dynamics of urban structure through spatial network. International Journal of Geographical Information Sci- ence 28(11): 2178-2199, http://dx.doi.or g/10.1080/13658816.20