Architecture: Distinguished or ordinary network agents in the field of its representation

This study will focus on the representation of Architecture with a capital A by questioning the phenomenon of ordinariness, starting with the question of where in the representations of Architecture can we trace the phenomenon of ordinari-ness?The paper goes on to disclose the paradoxical relationship between distinguish-edness and ordinariness. Bourdieus concepts of habitus and field are specified as methodological tools to analyze this paradox within the following two themes (i) the representation of architecture and architects as related to the social classes to which they belong (habitus) and (ii) the influence of architectural institutions and their network agents on architecture as they are socially represented (field). The concept of habitus, will help us to understand the social mechanisms of ar-chitecture and architects as distinguished and/or ordinary phenomena, while the concept of field will help us to analyze the operative principles of representational mechanisms.The field of architectural institutions (as understood of Bourdieusian term) de-scriptive phrases stated by the institutional actors will be taken as major data to examine this paradoxical mechanism. They will be represented by network maps to discuss which mechanisms structure the representational field of Architecture with a capital A whether as a distinguished and/or ordinary phenomenon.

___

Aravena, A. (2016). “Rationale” in Reporting from the Front: 15th International Architecture Exhibition Catalogue. Marsilio; Slp Edition, 21-30.

Başyazıcı B., Uluoğlu, B. (2017). The Phenomenon of Being Distinguished in Architecture; a Study on Pritzker Prize. Paper presented at the meeting of ATINER 7th Annual International Conference on Architecture, Athens.

Baudrillard, J., Nouvel, J. (2011). Tekil Nesneler. Yem Yayın, İstanbul. Benjamin, W. (2006). The Writer of Modern Life: Essays on Charles Baudelaire, Harvard University Press.

Betsky, A. (2014). The New York Times Versus Architecture. Architect Magazine. Retrieved from http://www. architectmagazine.com/design/thenew-york-times-versus-architecture_o

Betsky, A. (2016). Reporting from the Front: Postcard from the Venice Biennale. Retrieved from http://www. architectmagazine.com/design/exhibits-books-etc/reporting-from-thefront-postcard-from-the-venice-biennale_o

Bingler S., Pedersen, M. C. (2014). How to Rebuild Architecture. The New York Times. Retrieved from https:// www.nytimes.com/2014/12/16/opinion/how-to-rebuild-architecture.html

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Bourdieu, P., (1985). Distinction; A Social Critique of Judgement of Taste. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). “The Forms of Capital” in Richardson, J. (Ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York, Greenwood, 241-258.

Britannica. (2017). Pritzker Family American Business Family. Retrieved from http://global.britannica.com/topic/Pritzker-Prize

Britannica. (2018). Pritzker Prize International Architectural Award. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/ Pritzker-Prize

Dimaggio, P. (1991). “Constructing an Organizational Field as a Professional Project: U.S. Art Museums, 1920-1940” In Dimaggio, P., Powell W. (ed.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. The University of Chicago Press, 267-297.

Eisenman, P. (2014). Interview with peter Eisenman. Dezeen. Retrieved from https://www.dezeen. com/2014/06/09/rem-koolhaas-at-theend-of-career-says-peter-eisenman/

Forster, K. (2010). “Interview with Kurt Foster”, in Levy, A., Menking, W. (2012) Architecture on Display: On the History of the Venice Biennale of Architecture. Architectural Association Press, London.

Graw, I. (2006). “Beyond Institutional Critique”, in John C. Welchman (ed.), Institutional Critique and After. JRP Ringier, Zurich, 7-146.

Grenfell, M., (2008). Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts. Routledge, London.

Harvey, D. (2013). Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. Verso, USA.

Johnson, P., A. (1994). The Theory of Architecture: Concepts Themes and Practices. John Willey & Sons, USA.

Karatani, K. (1995). Architecture as Metaphor. MIT Press, USA.

Koolhaas, R. (2014). “Architecture not Architects” in Fundamentals: 14th International Architecture Exhibition Catalogue, Marsilio, 17-20.

Kostof, S. (1977). The Architect. University of California Press, USA.

La Biennale di Venezia. (2017). History of Venice Biennale. Retrieved from http://www.labiennale.org/en/ history

La Biennale di Venezia. (2018). History. Retrieved from http://www.labiennale.org/en/history

Levy, A., Menking, W. (2012). Architecture on Display: On the History of the Venice Biennale of Architecture. Architectural Association Press, London.

Los Angeles Times. (2016). A Grassroots, Handmade Venice Architecture Biennale from Alejandro Aravena. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/ entertainment/arts/la-et-cm-venicebiennale-review-20160530-snap-story. html

Lury, C. (2011). “Capital, Class and Consumer Culture”, in Consumer Culture. Polity Press, USA.

Moore, R. (2016). Venice Architecture Biennale 2016 – ideas for real world problems. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2016/may/29/ venice-architecture-biennale-2016-review-norman-foster

OMA. (2017). Rem Koolhaas Announces Title for Venice Architecture Biennale. Retrieved from http://oma. eu/news/rem-koolhaas-announces-themes-for-2014-venice-architecture-biennale

Pritzker Architecture Prize. (2017). About The Prize. Retrieved from https://www.pritzkerprize.com/about

Pritzker Architecture Prize. (2018). Ceremony. Retrieved from https:// www.pritzkerprize.com/about

Portoghesi, P. (2010). “Interview with Paolo Portoghesi”, in Levy, A., Menking, W. (2012) Architecture on Display: On the History of the Venice Biennale of Architecture. Architectural Association Press, London.

Schumacher, P. (2014). Facebook Post. Retrieved from https://www. facebook.com/patrik.schumacher.10/ posts/10202631928712343

Schumacher, P. (2016). Facebook Post. Retrieved from https://www. facebook.com/patrik.schumacher.10/ posts/10207222111024032

Schumacher, P. (2018). Interview with the Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/ cities/2018/jan/17/architect-patrik-schumacher-depicted-fascist-zaha-hadid

Sklair, L. (2005). “The Transnational Capitalist Class and Contemporary Architecture in Globalizing Cities”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Volume 29, Issue 3, 485–500.

Stallabrass, J. (2016). Sanat A.Ş. Çağdaş Sanat ve Bienaller, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.

Sudjic, D. (2014). Interview with Dezeen. Retrieved from https://www. dezeen.com/2014/06/05/critics-giveverdicts-on-rems-biennale-withoutany-architecture-in-sight/

Swartz, D. (2011). Kültür ve İktidar; Pierre Bourdieu’nün Sosyolojisi. İletişim Yayıncılık, İstanbul.

The Architects Journal. (2010). Venice Architecture Biennale 2010. Retrieved from https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/venice-architecture-biennale-2010/8605444.article

The Guardian (2010). This Year’s Venice Architecture Biennale is about People, not Plans. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2010/aug/31/venice-architecture-biennale

The Guardian. (2016). Alejandro Aravena’s Venice Architecture Biennale. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2016/may/26/ venice-architecture-biennale-alejandro-aravena

Zeiger, M, (2016). Is Architecture Really as Guileless as Aravena’s Biennale Suggests? Dezeen. Retrieved from https://www.dezeen.com/2016/06/01/ opinion-mimi-zeiger-venice-architecture-biennale-2016-honest-fronting/