İMPLANT ÜSTÜ GELENEKSEL ÖLÇÜ YÖNTEM, TEKNİK ve MALZEMELERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI OLARAK GÖZDEN GEÇİRİLMESİ: SİSTEMATİK BİR GÜNCELLEME
İmplant destekli protezlerin yapımında kullanılan farklı ölçü yöntemleri ve ölçü materyalleri, implant açısı, sayısı gibi klinik faktörler ölçünün doğruluğunu etkileyerek implantın başarısına büyük ölçüde tesir etmektedir. İmplant destekli protezlerin pasif uyumu, başarılı bir tedavi için çok önemli bir faktördür, Uyumlu bir protez yapılabilmesi için öncelikle doğru ve net bir ölçü alınması gerekmektedir. implant komponentleri ve protez arasında hatalı bir ölçü sonucunda oluşabilecek uyumsuzluk; vida gevşemesi, vida kırığı, plak akümülasyonunda artış, hatta osteointegrasyon kaybı ve implant kırığı gibi mekanik ve/veya biyolojik komplikasyonlara neden olabilmektedir. İmplant destekli protezlerde ölçüyü etkileyen faktörler; ölçü tekniği, ölçü materyalleri, ölçü kopinglerinin splintlenmesi veya splintlenmemesi, splintleme materyali, implant sayısı ve açısı olarak bildirilmiştir. İmplant destekli protezlerde kullanılan farklı ölçü yöntemleri ve materyallerinin karşılaştırılması ve ölçünün doğruluğunu etkileyen klinik faktörlerin tartışılması halen güncelliğini korumaktadır. Bu derlemenin amacı; implant üstü protezlerde standart ölçü yöntem ve tekniklerinin, özellikle dijital ölçünün daha popüler hale geldiği bu son yılların güncel makaleleri içinde geleneksel manuel ölçünün yerinin tesipiti yapılırken, son durumunun da sistematik olarak gözden geçirilmesiyle; aralarından halen geçerliliğini koruyan en uygun yöntemi tarif edecek araştırmayı ve karşılaştırmayı yaparak ortaya koymaktı,
___
- 1. Layla Assila ve ark, İmpression Techniques
For İmplant Dentistry (part1):closed tray
technique. 2018. Int. J. Adv. Res. 6(12): 1249-
1252.
2. Alikhasi M., Siadat H., Monzavi A., Momen-
Heravi F. Three-Dimensional accuracy of
implant and abutment level impression
techniques: Effect of marginal discrepancy.
Journal of Oral Implantology, 2011; 6: 649-
657.
3.Prithviraj DR, Pujari ML, Garg P., Shruthi
DP. Accuracy of the implant impression
obtained from different impression materials
and techniques: review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2011;
3(2): e106-111.
4.Balouch F., Jalalian E., Nikkheslat M.,
Ghavamian R., Toopchi Sh., Jallalian F.,
Jalalian S. Comparison of Dimensional
Accuracy between Open-Tray and Closed-
Tray Implant Impression Technique for 15°
Angle Implants. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci,
Sept. 2013; 14(3): 96-102.
5.Chee W., Jivraj S. Impression techniques for
implant dentistry. British Dental Journal 2006;
201: 429-432
6.Shankar YR., Sahoo S., Krishna MH.,
Kumar PS., Kumar TS., Narula S. Accuracy of
implant impressions using various impression
techniques and impression materials. J Dent
Implant 2016; 6: 29-36.
7. Lee H., Joseph S. So, Hochstedler JL.,
Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions:
A systematic review. Prosthet Dent. 2008; 100:
285-291.
8.Baig M.R. Multi-unit implant impression
accuracy: A review of the literature.
Quintessence Int 2014; 45: 39-51.
9. Maria menini ve ark .«Accuracy of multi
–unit implant impression: technique versus a
digital procedure. J Prosthet. 2018 Apr; 22(3):
1253-1262.
10. Accuracyofmulti-unitimplantimpression:
traditionaltechniques versus a digital procedure
Clin Oral Invest, 2018, 22: 1253-1262.
11. Lee H., So JS., Hochstedler JL., Ercoli
C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a
systematic review. J Prosthet Dent, 2008,
100: 285-291.
12. Baig MR. Accuracy of impressions of
multiple implants in the edentulous arch:
a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac
Implants, 2004, 29: 869-880.
13. De La Cruz JE,, Funkenbusch PD,, Ercoli
C,, Moss ME,, Graser GN,, Tallents RH.
(2002) Verification jig for implant-supported
prostheses: a comparison of standard
impressions with verification jigs made of
different materials. J Prosthet Dent, 88: 329-336.
14. Naconecy MM., Teixeira ER., Shinkai
RS., Frasca LC., Cervieri A. Evaluation of the
accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implantsupported
prostheses with multiple abutments.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004, 19: 192-
198.
15. Burawi G., Houston F., Byrne D., Claffey
N. A comparisonof the dimensional accuracy
ofthesplinted andunsplintedimpression
techniques for the Bone-Lockimplant system.
J Prosthet Dent, 1997, 77: 68-75.
16. Keul C., Stawarczyk B., Erdelt KJ., Beuer
F., Edelhoff D., Güth JF. Fit of 4-unit FDPs
made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside
and labside digitalization-a laboratory study.
Dent Mater, 2014, 30: 400-407.
17. Keul C., Stawarczyk B., Erdelt KJ., Beuer
F., Edelhoff D., Güth JF. Fit of 4-unit FDPs
made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside
and labside digitalization-a laboratory study.
Dent Mater, 2014 30: 400-407.
18. Syrek A., Reich G., Ranftl D., Klein C.,
Cerny B., Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of
all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral
digital impressions based on the principle of
active wavefront sampling. J Dent, 2010, 38:
553-559.
19. Joda T., Katsoulis J., Brägger U. Clinical
fitting and adjustmenttimeforimplant-suppor
tedcrownscomparingdigitalandconventional
workflows. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015.
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/cid.12377.
20. Hüseyin Aktöre ve ark. The evaluation
of factors that affect the accuracy of implant
impressions. J Cumuryet dental. 2014
available at. http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/
cumudj/21.20 Pandita A, Jain T, Yadav NS,
Feroz SM,Pradeep, Diwedi A. Evaluation and
comparison of dimensional accuracy of newly
introduced elastomeric impression material
using 3D laser scanners: an in vitro study. J
Contemp Dent Pract, 2013; 14: 265-268.
21. Carr AB. Comparison of impression
techniques for a two-implant 15-degree
divergent model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
1992;7: 468-475.
22. Jo SH, Kim KI, Seo JM, Song KY, Park
JM, Ahn SG. Effect of impression coping
and implant angulation on the accuracy of
implant impressions: an in vitro study. J Adv
Prosthodont 2010;2:128-133.
23. Reddy S, Prasad K, Vakil H, Jain A,
Chowdhary R. Accuracy of impressions with
different impression materials in angulated
implants. Niger J Clin Pract 2013;16: 279-284.
24. Assuncao WG, Cardoso A, Gomes EA,
Tabata LF, dos Santos PH. Accuracy of
impression techniques for implants. Part
1--Influence of transfer copings surface
abrasion. J Prosthodont 2008;17: 641-647.
25. Mostafa TMN, Elgendy MNM, Kashef
NA, Halim MM. Evaluation of the precision
of three implant transfer impression techniques
using two elastomeric impression materials.
Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23: 525-528.
26. Lee SJ, Macarthur RX 4th, Gallucci
GO. An evaluation of student and clinician
perception of digital and conventional implant
impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 110: 420-
423.
27. Reddy S, Prasad K, Vakil H, Jain A,
Chowdhary R. Accuracy of impressions with
different impression materials in angulated
implants. Niger J Clin Pract 2013; 16 :279-284.
28.Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Evaluation
of the accuracy of three techniques used for
multiple implant abutment impressions. J
Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 186-192.
29. Naconecy MM, Teixeira ER, Shinkai
RS, Frasca LC, Cervieri A. Evaluation of the
accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implantsupported
prostheses with multiple abutments.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 192-
198.
30. Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Penkner K, Polansky
R, Sedaj B, Wegscheider WA. Comparison
of the transfer precision of three different
impression materials incombination with
transfer caps for the Frialit-2 system. J Oral
Rehabil 2000; 27: 629-638.
31. Assuncao WG, Cardoso A, Gomes EA,
Tabata LF, dos Santos PH. Accuracy of
impression techniques for implants. Part
1--Influence of transfer copings.
32.Conrad HJ, Pesun IJ, Delong R, Hodges JS.
Accuracy of two impression techniques with
angulated implants. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97:
349-356.
33.Gayathridevi S.K, Harshita G.,Vaishali K.,
Suma. Impression Techniques in Implants.
Journal of Dental & Oro-facial Research Vol
12 Issue 02 Aug 2016.
34.Alexander Schmidt ve ark. accuracy of
various impression materialis and for two
implant systems. 2018 Apr; 62(2): 245-251.
35.W. Engelke, O.A. Decco, A.C. Cura, I.
Maldonado, F.G. CrippaInfluence of implant
diameter in the displacement of dental implants
in trabecular bovine bone under a static lateral
load: experimental results and computational
modelingImplant Dent, 23(2014): 635-640.
36. Ece, Şengül ve ark. impression techniques
used in implant-supported prosthesis: a review.
2015; 13 (2): 37-43.
37. Humphries RM, Yaman P, Bloem TJ. The
accuracy of implant master casts constructed
from transfer impressions. Int J Oral Maxillofac
Implants 1990; 5: 331.
38. De La Cruz JE, Funkenbusch PD, Ercoli
C, Moss ME, Graser GN, Tallents RH.
Verification jigs made of different materials. J
Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 329-336.
39. Phillips KM, Nicholls JI, Ma T, Rubenstein
J. The accuracy of three implant impression
techniques: A three-dimensional analysis. Int
J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9: 533-540.
40. Assuncao WG, Filho HG, Zaniquelli
O. Evaluation of transfer impressions for
osseointegrated implants at various angulations.
İmplant Dentistry 2004; 13: 358-364.
41. Selecman AM, Wicks RA. Making an
implant-level impression using solid plastik,
pres-fit, closed-tray impression copings: a
clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 101:
158-159.
42.Phillips KM, Nicholls JI, Ma T, Rubenstein
J. The accuracy of three implant impression
techniques: A three-dimensional analysis. Int J
Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994, s: 53340.
44. Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative Dental
Materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002
45. Jo SH, Kim KI, Seo JM, Song KY, Park
JM, Ahn SG. Effect of impression coping
and implant angulation on the accuracy of
implant impressions: An in vitro study. J Adv
Prosthodont 2010; 2: 128-133.
46. Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The
accuracy of implant impressions: A systematic
review. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 100: 285-291.
47. Wee AG. Comparison of impression
materials for direct multi-implant impressions.
J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 323-331.
48. Al Quran FA, Rashdan BA, Zomar
AA, Weiner S. Passive fit and accuracy of
three dental implant impression techniques.
Quintessence Int 2012; 43: 119-125.
49. Kim S, Nicholls JI, Han CH, Lee KW.
Displacement of implant components from
impressions to definitive casts. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 747-755.
50. Akalin ZF, Ozkan YK, Ekerim A. Effects of
implant angulation, impression material, and
variation in arch curvature width on implant
transfer model accuracy. Int J Oral Maxillofac
Implants 2013; 28: 149-157.
52. D’Arcangelo C, Zarow M, De Angelis
F, VadiniM, Paolantonio M, Giannoni M,
D’Amario M.Five-year retrospective clinical
study of indirectcomposite restorations luted
with a light-curedcomposite in posterior teeth.
Clin Oral Investig.18(2):615-24 (2014).
53. D’arcangelo C, De Angelis F, Vadini
M,D’Amario M. Clinical evaluation on
porcelainlaminate veneers bonded with lightcuredcomposite:
results up to 7 years. Clinical
oral investigations. 16(4):1071-9 (2012).
54.Herfort TW, Gerberich WW, Macosko CW,
Goodkind RJ. Tear strength of elastomeric
mpression materials J Prosthet Dent. 39(1):59-
62: (1978).
55. Al-Kaisy N. A Survey of Prosthodontics
Techniques Applied by Dental Practitioners
in Sulaimani City. J Bagh Coll Dentistry;
28(3):22-29) (2016).
56. Reddy GV, Reddy NS, Itttigi J, Jagadeesh
KN. A comparative study to determine
the wettabilityand castability of different
elastomeric impressionmaterials. J Contemp
Dent Pract. 13(3):356-63(2012 ).
57. Filho HG, Mazaro JVQ, Vedovatto E,
Assunçao WG, dos Santos PH. Accuracy
of impression techniques for implants. Part
2 - comparison of splinting techniques. J
Prosthodont 2009;18:172-176.
58. Buzayan M, Baig MR, Yunus N. Evaluation
of accuracy of completearch multiple-unit
abutment-level dental implant impressions
using different impression and splinting
materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
2013;28:1512-1520.
59.Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini
G, Zarone F. Effect of implant angulation,
connection length, and impression material
on the dimensional accuracy of implant
impressions: an in vitrocomparative study.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:63-76
60.Petrie, CS, Walker, MP, O’Mahony, AM,
andSpencer, P. Dimensional accuracy and
surfacedetail reproduction of two hydrophilic
vinylpolysiloxane impression materials
tested underdry, moist, and wet conditions. J
ProsthetDent.; 90: 365–372 (2003).
61. Kess RS, Combe EC, Sparks BS. Effect
ofsurface treatments on the wettability of
vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J
ProsthetDent. 84(1):98-102 (2000).
62. Nassar U1, Oko A, Adeeb S, El-Rich
M, Flores-Mir C. An in vitro study on the
dimensionalstability of a vinyl polyether
silicone impressionmaterial over a prolonged
storage period. JProsthet Dent. 109(3):172-8.
63. Pandita A1, Jain T, Yadav NS, Feroz
SM, Pradeep, Diwedi A. Evaluation and
comparison of dimensional accuracy of newly
introducedelastomeric impression material
using 3D laser scanners: an in vitro study. J
Contemp DentMohammed et al. Biomed. &
Pharmacol. J, Vol. 11(3), 1359-1368 (2018)
1367Pract. 14(2):265-8 (2013).
64. Herbst D, Nel JC, Driessen CH, Becker
PJ. Evaluation of impression accuracy
for osseointegrated implant-supported
superstructures. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:555-
61.
65. Naconecy MM, Teixeira ER, Shinkai
RS, Frasca LC, Cervieri A. Evaluation of the
accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implantsupported
prostheses with multiple abutments.
Int J Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2004;19:192-8.