Gender Effect on Motion Sickness Susceptibility

The study aimed was to determine whether there was a gender difference in sensitivity to visual stimulation-induced motion sickness (MS). Forty-nine participants (Female: 24, Male: 25) volunteered to join in the study. Participants were exposed to a visual video-recording stimulus to evoke the MS. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) was administered before, after, and 30 min after the MS stimulation to determine MS symptoms. Participants' self-report was used to identify motion sickness. Postural sway (PS) was measured before and immediately after MS stimulation. 58.3% of the female and 48.0% of the male reported that they had MS, while 41.7% of the female and 52.0% of the male reported that they did not have MS. Gender and MS distributions were not significant (p=0.469). Participants with MS before the stimulation had higher PS than those who declared no MS (p=0.008), but PS was not different after the stimulation (p=0.102). Although there was no difference in the pre-test (p=0.231), men with MS had higher PS than women with MS at the post-test (p=0.013). There was a significant increase in PS of men who declared that they had MS after the stimulation (p=0.012). The pre-test (p=0.899) and post-test (p=0.434) SSQ scores of men and women with MS were not different, while women had higher SSQ scores than men at the post-test 30 (p=0.020). Finally, there was no correlation between gender and rates of MS. In terms of symptom severity, females appear to be more susceptible to MS. PS may be a precursor to MS.

Gender Effect on Motion Sickness Susceptibility

The study aimed was to determine whether there was a gender difference in sensitivity to visual stimulation-induced motion sickness (MS). Forty-nine participants (Female: 24, Male: 25) volunteered to join in the study. Participants were exposed to a visual video-recording stimulus to evoke the MS. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) was administered before, after, and 30 min after the MS stimulation to determine MS symptoms. Participants' self-report was used to identify motion sickness. Postural sway (PS) was measured before and immediately after MS stimulation. 58.3% of the female and 48.0% of the male reported that they had MS, while 41.7% of the female and 52.0% of the male reported that they did not have MS. Gender and MS distributions were not significant (p=0.469). Participants with MS before the stimulation had higher PS than those who declared no MS (p=0.008), but PS was not different after the stimulation (p=0.102). Although there was no difference in the pre-test (p=0.231), men with MS had higher PS than women with MS at the post-test (p=0.013). There was a significant increase in PS of men who declared that they had MS after the stimulation (p=0.012). The pre-test (p=0.899) and post-test (p=0.434) SSQ scores of men and women with MS were not different, while women had higher SSQ scores than men at the post-test 30 (p=0.020). Finally, there was no correlation between gender and rates of MS. In terms of symptom severity, females appear to be more susceptible to MS. PS may be a precursor to MS.

___

  • Arnold, B.L., & Schmitz, R.J. (1998). Examination of balance measures produced by the biodex stability system. J Athl Train, 33(4), 323-27.
  • Bos, J.E., Bles, W., & Groen, E.L. (2008). A theory on visually induced motion sickness. Displays, 29, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2007.09.002
  • Bos, J.E., Ledegang., W.D, Lubeck, A.J.A., & Stins, J.F. (2013). Cinerama sickness and postural instability. Ergonomics, 56, 1430-1436. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.817614
  • Cachup, W.J.C., Shifflett, B., Kahanov, L., & Wughalter, E.H. (2001). Reliability of biodex balance system measures. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci, 5, 97-08. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327841MPEE0502_3
  • Colwell, J.L., Allen, N., Bos. J., Bridger, R., Duncan, C., Elischer, P., Grech, M., Green, A., Hogervost, M.A., MacKinnon, S.N., Munnoch, K., Perraukt, D., Roger, W., Schwatz R., Valk, P., & Wright, D. (2009). Human performance sea trial QUEST Q-303. In: ABCD Symposium Human Performance in the Maritime Environment Pacific 2008. International Maritime Conference. Sydney. Austraila.
  • Cooper, C., Dunbar, N., & Mira, M. (1997). Sex and seasickness on the coral sea. Lancet, 350, 892. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)62083-1
  • Curry, C., Li R, Peterson, N., & Stoffregen, T.A. (2020). Cybersickness in virtual reality head-mounted displays: Examining the influence of sex differences and vehicle control. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36, 1161-1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1726108
  • Dobie, T., McBride, D., Dobie, T., & May, J. (2001). The effects of age and sex on susceptibility to motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med, 72, 13-20.
  • Domeyer, J.E., Cassavaugh, N.D., & Backs, R.W. (2013). The use of adaptation to reduce simulator sickness in driving assessment and research. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 53,127-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.039
  • Flanagan, M.B., May, J.G., & Dobie, T.G. (2005). Sex differences in tolerance to visually-induced motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med, 76(7), 642-646.
  • Gahlinger, P.M. (1999). Motion sickness. Postgraduate Med, 106(4), 177-186. https://doi.org/10.3810/pgm.1999.10.1.719
  • Golding, J.F., & Gresty, M.A. (2015). Pathophysiology and treatment of motion sickness. Current Opinion in Neurology, 28(1), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000163
  • Golding, J.F., & Gresty, M.A. (2005). Motion sickness. Current-Opinion in Neurology, 18(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/00019052-200502000-00007
  • Golding, J.F. (2006). Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(2), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.012
  • Hemmerich, W. A., Shahal, A., & Hecht, H. (2019). Predictors of visually induced motion sickness in women. Displays, 58, 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2018.11.005
  • Henriques, I. F., de Oliveira D.W.D., Oliveira-Ferreira, F., & Andrade, P.M.O. (2014). Motion sickness prevalence in school children. Eur J Pediatr, 173(11), 1473-1482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-014-2351-1
  • Herron, D.G. (2010). The ups and downs of motion sickness. Am J Nurs, 110(12), 49–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000391242.75887.17.
  • Hettinger, L.J., & Riccio, G.E. (1992). Visually induced motion sickness in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1, 306-310. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.3.306
  • Hinman, M.R. (2000). Factors affecting reliability of the biodex balance system; a summary of four studies. J Sports Rehabil, 9, 240-52. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.9.3.240
  • Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S., Lilienthal, M.G., (1993). Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int J Aviat Psychol, 3, 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3
  • Kennedy, R.S., Drexler, J., & Kennedy, R.C. (2010). Research in visually induced motion sickness. Applied Ergonomics, 41, 494-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.11.006
  • Keshavarz, B., & Hecht, H. (2012). Stereoscopic viewing enhances visually induced motion sickness but sound does not. Presence, 21, 213-28. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00102
  • Keshavarz, B., & Hecht, H. (2014). Pleasant music as a countermeasure against visually induced motion sickness. Applied Ergonomics, 45, 521-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.07.009
  • Keshavarz, B., Hecht, H., & Lawson B. D. (2014). Visually induced motion sickness: Characteristics, causes and countermeasures. In: Hale K. S., & Stanney K. M. (Eds.). Handbook of virtual environments: Design implementation and applications (pp. 648-697). CRC Press.
  • Keshavarz, B., Murovec, B., Mohanathas, N., & Golding, J.F. (2023). The visually induced motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire (VIMSSQ): Estimating individual susceptibility to motion sickness-like symptoms when using visual devices. Human Factors, 65(1), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211008687
  • Keshavarz, B., Ramkhalawansingh, R., Haycock, B., Shahab, S., & Campos, J.L. (2018). Comparing simulator sickness in younger and older adults during simulated driving under different multisensory conditions. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 54, 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.007
  • Klosterhalfen, S., Pan, F., Kellermann, S., & Enck, P. (2006). Gender and race as determinants of nausea induced by circular vection. Gender Medicine, 3, 236-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1550-8579(06)80211-1
  • Koslucher, F.C., Haaland, E.J., & Stoffregen, T.A., (2016). Sex differences in visual performance and postural sway precede sex differences in visually induced motion sickness. Exp Brain Res, 234, 313-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4462-y
  • Kousoulis, P., Pantes, A., Alevetsovitis, G., & Fydanaki, O. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Greek version of the gianaros motion sickness assessment questionaire. Aerosp Med Hum Perform, 87(11), 954-957. https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.4540.2016
  • Ladwig, K. H., Marten-Mittag, B., Formanek, B., & Dammann, G. (2000). Gender differences of symptom reporting and medical health care utilization in the German population. European Journal of Epidemiology, 16, 511-518. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007629920752
  • Lawson, B. D. (2014). Motion sickness scaling. In: Hale K. S., & Stanney K. M. (Eds.). Handbook of virtual environments: Design implementation and applications (pp. 648-697). CRC Press.
  • Lawther, A., & Griffin, M.J. (1986). The motion of a ship at sea and the consequent motion sickness amongst passengers. Ergonomics, 29, 535-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138608968289
  • Lawther, A., & Griffin, M.J. (1987). Prediction of the incidence of motion sickness from the magnitude. frequency. and duration of vertical oscillation. J Acoust Soc Am, 82, 957-66. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.395295
  • Matchock, R.L., Levine, M.E., Gianaros, P.J., & Stern, R.M. (2008). Susceptibility to nausea and motion sickness as a function of the menstrual cycle. Women’s Health Issues, 18, 328-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2008.01.006
  • Munafo, J., Diedrick, M., & Stoffregen, T. A. (2017). The virtual reality head-mounted display Oculus rift induces motion sickness and is sexist in its effects. Exp Brain Res, 235, 889-901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4846-7
  • Murdin, L., Golding, J., & Bronstein, A. (2011). Managing motion sickness. BMJ, 2, 343. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7430
  • Oman, C.M., (2012). Are evolutionary hypotheses for motion sickness “just-so” stories? J Vestib Res, 22, 117-27. https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-2011-0432
  • Owen, N., Leadbetter, A. G., & Yardley, L. (1998). Relationship between postural control and motion sickness in healthy subjects. Brain Res Bull, 47(5), 471-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-9230(98)00101-4
  • Özkan, Y., & Köse Özkan, C. (2014). Motion Sickness. Naval Forces Journal, 619, 111-13.
  • Paillard, A.C., Quarck, G., Paolino, F., Denise, P., Paolino, M., Golding, JF., & Ghulyan-Bedikian, V. (2013). Motion sickness susceptibility in healthy subjects and vestibular patients: Effects of gender, age and trait-anxiety. J Vestib Res, 23, 203-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-9230(98)00101-410.3233/VES-130501
  • Pöhlmann, K, M., Li., G., McGill, M., Pollick, F., & Brewster, S. (2023). Can gender and motion sickness susceptibility predict cybersickness in VR?. In 2023 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) March. (pp. 277-282). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW58643.2023.00066
  • Reason, J.T., & Brand, J.J. (1975). Motion sickness. Academic Press.
  • Riccio, G.E., & Stoffregen, T.A. (1991). An ecological theory of motion sickness and postural instability. Ecol Psychol, 3, 195-40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0303_2
  • Schwab, R.S. (1954). The nonlabyrinthine causes of motion sickness. International Record Medicine, 167(12), 631-37.
  • Smyth, J., Jennings, P., Mouzakitis, A., & Birrell, S. (2018). Too sick to drive: How motion sickness severity impacts human performance. In 2018 21st international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), IEEE, November, 1787-1793. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569572
  • Stanney, K. M., Kennedy, R. S., Drexler, J. M., Harm, D. L. (1999). Motion sickness and proprioceptive after effects following virtual environment exposure. Applied Ergonomics, 30, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00039-8
  • Stanney, K., Fidopiastis, C., & Foster, L. (2020). Virtual reality is sexist: But it does not have to be. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00004
  • Stanney, K.M., Hale, K.S., Nahmens, I., & Kennedy, R.S. (2003). What to expect from immersive virtual environment exposure: Influences of gender. body mass index. and past experience. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 45, 504-520. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.45.3.504.27254
  • Stoffregen, T.A., Chen, F-C., Varlet, M., Alcantara, C., & Bardy, B.G. (2013). Getting your sea legs. PLoS One, 8, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166900
  • Turner, M., Griffin, M. J., & Holland, I. (2000). Airsickness and aircraft motion during short-haul flights. Aviat. Space Environ Med, 71, 1181-1189.
  • Villard, S.J., Flanagan, M.B., Albanese, G.M., & Stoffregen, T.A. (2008). Postural instability and motion sickness in a virtual moving room. Human Fact, 50, 332-45. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X250728
  • Yardley, L. (1992). Motion sickness and perception: a reappraisal of the sensory conflict approach. Br J Psychol, 83, 449-473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02452.x
Avrasya Spor Bilimleri ve Eğitim Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2019
  • Yayıncı: Nazmi SARITAŞ
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Rekreasyon Fayda Farkındalıkları ile Fiziksel Aktivite Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi

Yasin ERSÖZ, İrfan YILDIRIM, Rabia ZEYTUN

Sport Organizations in World Literature: Status and Systematic Determinants

Murat AYGÜN

Genç Kuşakların Spor Farkındalığı ile Yaşam Doyumları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Hacı Şükrü TAŞTAN, Ali Davut ALKAN

Gender Effect on Motion Sickness Susceptibility

Yağmur KOCAOĞLU, Yasemin BAYRAKTAR, Nurtekin ERKMEN

Elektrostimülasyon ve Zumba Egzersizinin Sedanter Kadınlarda Bazı Fiziksel ve Fizyolojik Parametreleri Üzerine Etkilerinin Karşılaştırılması

Neslihan AKÇAY, Hilal DOĞAN GÜNEY, Mahmut Esat UZUN, Aybala CEBECİK, Mustafa Şakir AKGÜL

Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Öğretmenlerinin Çoklu Zekâ Kuramına Göre Zekâ Alanlarının İncelenmesi

Çiğdem KARAGÜLMEZ SAĞLAM, Erman DOĞAN

65 Yaş ve Üstü Bireylerin Yaşam Kalitesini Etkileyen Değişkenlerin Çoklu Regresyon Analizi ile Belirlenmesi

Tolga BEŞİKÇİ

Yeme Problemi Olan Otizmli Bireylere Uyarlanmış Fiziksel Aktivite ve Beslenme Programı ile Müdahale

Didem YAZAR, Hulusi ALP

Türk Beden Eğitimi Öğretmenlerinin Derslerinde Kullandıkları Öğretim Stillerinin Öğretim Programlarının Amaç ve Kazanımları ile Uyumu

Mehmet YANIK, Tarık BALCI, Zekeriya GOKTAS

Manchester City’s Start of the Offensive Phase: A Lag-Sequential Analysis

James SCİCLUNA, Renzo KERR-CUMBO, Kemal GÖRAL, Ender ŞENEL