___

• Akyol, H. (2008). Yeni Programa Uygun Türkçe Öğretim Yöntemleri, Ankara: Kök Yayıncılık.
• Akyol, H., & Temur, T. (2006). İlköğretim üçüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin okuma düzeyleri ve sesli okuma hataları. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, 10(29), 259-274.
• Alexander, P. A. & Fox, E. (2013). A historical perspective on reading research and practice, redux. In D. E. Alverman, N. J. Unrau & R. B. Ruddel (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, (6th edition), (pp. 3-46). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
• Baştuğ, Muhammet, & Kaman, Şafak. (2012). Nörolojik etki yönteminin öğrencilerin akıcı okuma ve anlama becerilerine etkisi. 11. Sınıf Öğretmenliği Sempozyumu, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi, Rize.
• Brooker, H.G. (2013).The effects of visual imagery and keyword cues on third-grade readers' memory, comprehension, and vocabulary knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Education, Clemson University, South Carolina, USA.
• Buehl, D. (2009). Classroom strategies for interactive learning (3rd ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
• Cain, K. (2006). Children's reading comprehension: the role of working memory in normal and impaired development. In: Pickering, Susan J. (Ed.), Working Memory and Education. Educational Psychology Series, (s.75), Amsterdam: Academic Press. (Elektronik sürüm)
• Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2007). Issues of Causalitlerzy in Childeren’s Reading Comprehension. In: McNamara, D. S. (Ed), Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies, (ss.47-73, NewYork, Routledge. (Elektronik Sürüm)
• Epçaçan, Cevdet. "Okuduğunu Anlama Stratejilerine Genel Bir Bakış." Journal of International Social Research 1.6 (2009). Chikalanga, I. (1992). A Suggested Taxanomy of Inferences for Reading Teacher, Reading in a Foreign Language, 8 (2), 697-709
• Clay, M. M. (1993). Reading Recovery. A guidebook for teachers in training. Auckland: Heinemann Education.
• Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: the construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
• Combs, M. (2006). Readers and writers in primary grades: A balanced and integrated approach K-4. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
• Cranganu-Cretu, B., Chen, Z., Uchimoto, T. ve Miya, K. (2001). Automatic text summarizing based on sentence extraction: A statistical approach. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 13(1-4), 19-23
• Cranganu-Cretu, B., Chen, Z., Uchimoto, T. ve Miya, K. (2001). Automatic text summarizing based on sentence extraction: A statistical approach. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 13(1-4), 19-23
• Çaycı, B., & Demir, M. K. (2006). Okuma ve anlama sorunu olan öğrenciler üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir çalışma. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(4), 437-456.
• Daane, M. C., Campbell, J. R., Grıgg, W. S., Goodman, M. J., & Oranje, A. (2005). Fourth-grade students reading aloud: Naep 2002 special study of oral reading. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
• Daly, E. J., & Martens, B.K. (1994). A comparison of three interventions for increasing oral reading performance: Application of the instructional hierarchy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 27, 459–469.
• Davis, M. ve Hult, R. F. (1997). Effects of writing summaries as a generative learning activity during note-taking. Teaching of Psychology, 24(1), 47-49.
• Davoudi, M. (2005). Infernece Generatıon Skıll And Text Comprehensıon, The Reading Matrix, 5(1), 106-123.
• Dori, Y. D. & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 411-430.
• Dowhower, S. L. (1991). Speaking of prosody: Fluency's unattended bedfellow. Theory Into Practice, 30(3), 165-175.
• Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup ve S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction, (pp. 205–242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
• Fielding, L., & Pearson, P. D. (1994). Reading comprehension: What works? Educational Leadership, 51(5), 62–67.
• Fisher, D.,& Frey, R. (2008). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Fisher, R.W. (2007). The effect of guided mental imagery on the ıntrinsic reading motivation of fourth and fifth grade students. (Doctoral dissertation). Widener University.
• Fountas, I.C., & Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Guided reading: good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
• Frey, N., & Fisher, D. B. (2006). Language arts workshop: Purposeful reading and writing instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies: promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children. The Journal of Special Education. 39, p. 34-44.
• Gambrell, L. B., & Bales, R. J. (1986). Mental imagery and the comprehension-monitoring performance of fourth- and fifth-grade poor readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 454–464. https://doi.org/10.2307/747616
• Gilbert, L., Williams, R. L., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1996). Use of assisted reading to increase correct reading rates and decrease errors of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 255- 257.
• Gromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2004). Testing the Fit of Three Models to Reading Comprehension Data for High School Students, http://azevedolab.autotutor.org/files/publications/Cromley%20Azevedo%20Model%20 Fitting%20AERA%202004%20paper.pdf (Ulaşım tarihi: 20 Mayıs 2022)
• Guthrie, J. T., & Taboada, A. (2004). Fostering the cognitive strategies of reading comprehension. In J. T., Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. Perencevich, (Eds.) Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (pp.87-112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Güneş, F. (2013). Türkçe öğretimi yaklaşımlar ve modeller. Ankara: PegemA Yayınları.
• Güneş, F. (2007). Türkçe öğretimi ve zihinsel yapılandırma. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi
• Hagaman, J. L., Luschen, K., & Reid, R. (2010). The “RAP” on reading comprehension. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(1), 22-29.
• Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2007). Strategies that work: teaching comprehension for understanding and engagement. Portlan, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
• Hibbing, A. N., & Rankin-Erickson, J. L. (2003). A picture is worth a thousand words: Using visual images to improve comprehension for middle school struggling readers. The Reading Teacher, 56(8), 758-771.
• Hill, M. (1991). Writing summaries promotes thinking and learning across the curriculum but why are they so difficult to write?. Journal of reading, 34(7), 536-539.
• Hudson, R. F., Lane, H. B., & Pullen, P. C. (2005). Reading fluency assessment and instruction: What, why, and how? Reading Teacher, 58(8), 702-714.
• Hung, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Lee, Y. H., Wu, T. H., Vogel, B., Milrad, M., and Johansson, E. (2014). A problem-based ubiquitous learning approach to improving the questioning abilities of elementary school students. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 17(4), 316-334.
• Hoffman, M. L. (1987). The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment. N. Eisenberg ve J. Strayer (Eds.), Empati ve gelişimi (s. 47-80). New York: Cambridge Üniversitesi
• Hornsby, D. (2000). A closer look at guided reading. Armadale, WA, Australia: Eleanor Curtain Publishing.
• Houtveen, A. A. M., & Van de Grift, W. J. C. M. (2007). Effects of metacognitive strategy instruction and instruction time on reading comprehension, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(2), 173–190.
• Kocaaslan, M., Akyol, H., & Güneş, F. (2016). Zihinsel imaj oluşturma öğretiminin 4.sınıf öğrencilerinin okuduğunu anlama, okuma tutumu ve zihinsel imaj netliği üzerindeki etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H.U. Journal of Education) 32(1), 63-80 [2017].
• Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Meisinger, E. B., Levy, B. A., & Rasinski, T. V. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230-251.
• Lerner, J.W. (1997). Learning Disabilities, Theories, Diagnosis And Teaching Strategies.
• Long, S. A., Winograd, P. N., & Bridge, C. A. (1989). The effects of reader and text characteristics on imagery reported during and after reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(3), 353-372.
• Macomber, C. (2001).The use of mental imagery and its relation to reading attitudes among fourth grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University School of Education, New York.
• Mathes, P. G., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Henley, A. M., & Sanders, A. (1994). Increasing strategic reading practice with Peabody classwide peer tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9, 44-48.
• Mıller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2008). A longitudinal study of the development of reading prosody as a dimension of oral reading fluency in early elementary school children. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(4), 336-354.
• Moskal, M. K., & Keneman, A. F. (2011). Literacy leadership to support reading ıcmprovement: ıntervention programs and balanced ınstruction. Newyork, NY: Guilford Press.
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and HumanDevelopment.
• Nelson, D. G. K., Hirshpasek, K., Jusczyk, P. W., & Cassidy, K. W. (1989). How the prosodic cues in motherese might assist language-learning. Journal of Child Language, 16(1), 55-68.
• Nygaard, Lynne C., Herold, Debora S., & Namy, Laura L. (2009). The semantics of prosody: Acoustic and perceptual evidence of prosodic correlates to word meaning. Cognitive Science, 33(1), 127-146. doi: 10.1111/j.1551- 6709.2008.01007.x Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Pressley, M. ve Gaskins, I.W. (2006). Metacognitively competent reading comprehension is constructively responsive reading: How can such reading be developed in students?. Metacognition Learning, 1, 99–113.
• Poore, M. A. ve Ferguson, S. H. (2008). Methodological variables in choral reading. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 22(1), 13-24.
• Rasinski, T. (2010). The fluent reader. New York: Scholastic Inc.
• Rasinski, T. (2006). Reading fluency instruction: Moving beyond accuracy, automaticity and prosody. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 704-706.
• Sadoski, M. (2005). A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21, 221-238.
• Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A Dual Coding Theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2004). A dual coding view of imagery and verbal processes in reading comprehension. In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, and H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp.582-601). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
• Salinger, T. (1993). Models of literacy instruction. Macmillan Publishing Company.
• Samuels, S. J. (2006). Looking backward: Reflection on a carrier in reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(3), 327-344. Uysal, Pınar KANIK. "Akıcı Okuma, Okuduğu Anlama ve Kelimenin Geliştirilmesinde Kullanılan Bir Yöntem: Okuma Tiyatrosu." Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi 9.1 (2021): 76-93.
• Valencıa, S. W., Smıth, A. T., Reece, A. M., LI, M., Wıxson, K. K., & Newman, H. (2010). Oral reading fluency assessment: Issues of construct, criterion, and consequential validity. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(3), 270- 291.
• Walker, B. J. (2005). Thinking aloud: Struggling readers often require more than a model. Reading Teacher, 58(7), 688-692.
• Williams, (2007). Literacy in the curriculum: Integrating text structure and content area instruction In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: theories, interventions, and technologies, (pp. 199-219). New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Whalley, K., & Hansen, J. (2006). The role of prosodic sensitivity in children's reading development. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(3), 288- 303.
• Zohar, A. ve Dori, YJ (2003). Yüksek Düzeyli Düşünme Becerileri ve Düşük Başarılı Öğrenciler: Birbirine Özel mi? Öğrenme Bilimleri Dergisi, 12, 145-181.
• Zoller, U., Dori, Y. ve Lubezky, A (2002). Algorithmic, LOCS and HOCS (Chemistry) Exam Questions: Performance and Attitudes of College Students. International Journal of Sicience Education, 24(2), 185-203.