Raif ALAN, Ahmet ERBEYOĞLU

The importance of linear measurements made using panoramic radiography in pre-implant site assessment: actual vs. measured

Background: In order to reduce post-operative failure and ensure successful rehabilitation, patients scheduled for dental implant treatment are often evaluated pre-operatively using radiographic images in addition to clinical examination. This study aimed to investigate the reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the pre-implant site assessment. Methods: Panoramic images of 150 patients with the total of the 396 implants placed in the maxilla (n=165) and mandible (n=231), were examined in the study. Radiographic measurements (vertical and horizontal) were recorded on the computer using the automatic calibration tab for each radiograph and compared with the actual implant dimensions. Moreover, the effects of location, gender, and change in dimensions on magnification rate (MR) were also investigated. The measurements were made by two experienced observers. Results: Panoramic vertical measurements were significantly higher in both the maxilla and mandible compared to the actual implant lengths (p

Keywords:

Dental implants, Image analysis Panoramic radiography, Site preparation,

PDF

___

Kim YK, Park JY, Kim SG, Kim JS, Kim JD. Magnification rate of digital panoramic radiographs and its effectiveness for pre-operative assessment of dental implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(2):76-83.
Siu ASC, Chu FCS, Li TKL, Chow TW, Deng F. Imaging modalities for preoperative assessment in dental implant therapy: an overview. Hong Kong Dent J. 2010;7:23-30.
Mengel R, Candir M, Shiratori K, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of periodontal defects: an in vitro study on native pig and human mandibles. J Periodontol. 2005;76(5):665-73.
Mengel R, Kruse B, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles. J Periodontol. 2006;77(7):1234-41.
Tohnak S, Mehnert AJ, Mahoney M, Crozier S. Synthesizing dental radiographs for human identification. J Dent Res. 2007;86(11):1057-62.
Cho YS. Diagnostic value of dental CT (DentaScan) in dental implant. Chungbuk Med J. 1998;8:11-9.
Nagarajan A, Perumalsamy R, Thyagarajan R, Namasivayam A. Diagnostic imaging for dental implant therapy. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2014;27:4(Suppl 2):4.
Ogawa K, Langlais RP, McDavid WD, Noujeim M, Seki K, Okano T, et al. Development of a new dental panoramic radiographic system based on a tomosynthesis method. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39(1):47-53.
Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Comparison of panoramic and conventional cross-sectional tomography for preoperative selection of implant size. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(4):424-9.
Kayal RA. Distortion of digital panoramic radiographs used for implant site assessment. J Orthod Sci. 2016;5(4):117-20.
McDavid WD, Dove SB, Welander U, Tronje G. Dimensional reproduction in direct digital rotational panoramic radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993;75(4):523-7.
Choi YG, Kim YK, Eckert SE, Shim CH. Cross-sectional study of the factors that influence radiographic magnification of implant diameter and length. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(4):594-6.
Park JB (2010). The evaluation of digital panoramic radiographs taken for implant dentistry in the daily practice. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15(4):e663-6.
Vazquez L, Nizamaldin Y, Combescure C, Nedir R, Bischof M, Dohan Ehrenfest DM, et al. Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(2):20110429.