Öz İn ordcr ro underetand and calk about (hc Grcat Türk who had the utmost (tesire and objcctivr of raısing Juj nation to thc )c\'cl of dviiiaation cnjo>'cd by Watcrn sockücs, onc must bccomc acqu« aİntrd wi(h “ıhr Principh» of *A*uiürk from ıhc pcrspecüvc of K>cio"Cultur4İ anthropok^. Undoubtcdiy, such a uuk should be ıhc misMon ı>f rclated TurkûJ) seholars. In fac(,ihrrc lıaabccn a faİr number of forcign and Turlush teho Urf u-tıo have Ukcıı up Atatürk's Priıtcİplcs from (he potni of vicw of sodal S*ciences alongside ıhQİi()ctanf a sutesman» a great soldicr and a genius. Alt ıhc samc, ıhc cutlural pertpeetive has not been fully accounied for. Thh artielc attempu lo mçet ıhe demand revulüng from (his undue negligencc.