Mohammad Kamran KHAN, Mohammed Fahud KHURRAM, Arshad Hafeez KHAN, Nazia Umme HABIBA, Madhav CHOWDHRY

Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries: Our experience with early active movement protocol for rehabilitation of tendons

Introduction: Flexor tendon injuries of the hand are common occurring these days and its management is still far from ideal. Thefunctional outcome of zone 2 flexor tendon injuries are not good in view of higher incidence of adhesion formation. Numerousstudies have been reported but yet nothing is deemed ideal.Objective: This study was conducted to see the results of primary repair of zone 2 flexor tendon injuries with prolene suture and earlysupervised aggressive mobilization and rehabilitation protocol.Design: Prospective study (Level IV evidence) reporting case series.Setting: Academic hospital associated with a medical collegeParticipants: All patients with isolated flexor tendon injuries in zone 2 of the hand.Interventions: All tendons were repaired with prolene suture using standard operative procedures. Immediate splintage was donewith thermoplastic splints and hand kept in dorsal blocking of 20 degrees flexion at wrist and 75 degrees at metacarpophalangealjoint. Rubber elastic springs were used for passive flexion which were fixed at nails and distal forearm. Early postoperative exerciseswere started after 48 hours of repair under direct supervision with passive extension and flexion. Gradually active exercises wereadded to the protocol. Finger splint was used for 4 weeks during whole day and after that it was used during night time only.Outcome measures: Outcome (tendon excursion) was evaluated using Strickland evaluation system and categorized as excellent,good, fair and poor.Results: A total of 50 patients (males- 32; females- 18) with zone 2 flexor tendon injuries were included and analyzed. Overall 85.7%digits had excellent or good results. Patients with single digit involvement had 94% excellent result in comparison to 31% in multipledigit involvement group (p

PDF

___

1. Boyes JH. Flexor-tendon grafts in the fingers and thumb; an evaluation of end results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1950;32:489–99.
2. Bunnell S. Repair of tendons in the fingers and description of two instruments. Surg Gynaecol Obstet 1918;26:103-10.
3. Duran R, Houser R, Coleman C, et al. preliminary report into the use of controlled passive motion following flexor tendon repair in zones II and III. J Hand Surg 1976:1:79.
4. Duran RH, Houser RG. Controlled passive motion following flexor tendon repairs in zones II and III. In American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Symposium on Flexor Tendon Surgery in the Hand, Hunter JM , Schneider LH eds, St.Louis:Mosby 1975:105-14. 5. Elliot D, Moiemen N, Flemmings A, H, et al. The rupture rate of acuteflexor tendon repairs mobilized by the controlled active motion regimen. J Hand Surg 1994;19B:607-12.
6. Gelberman RH, Amilf D, Gonsalves M, et al. The influence of protected passive mobilisation on the healing of flexor tendons: A biochemical and microangiographic study. Hand 1981:13:120-8.
7. Harris SB, Harris D, Foster AJ, et al. The aetiology of acute rupture of flexor tendon repairs in zones 1 and 2 of the fingers during early mobilization. J Hand Surg Brit 1999:24:275-80
8. Kessler I, Nissim F. Primary repair without immobilisation of flexor tendon division within the digital sheath. Acta Orthop Scand 1969:40;587-601.
9. Kleinert HE, Kutz JE, Ashbell TS et al. Primary repair of lacerated flexor tendon in no man’s land (abstract). J Bone Joint Surg 1967;49A:577.
10. Mason ML, Allen HS. The rate of healing of tendons. An experimental study of tensile strength. Ann Surg 1941:113:424-59.
11. Mason ML. Primary and secondary tendon suture. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1940;70:392-402.
12. Rust P and Eckersley R. Twenty questions on tendon injuries of the hand. Current Orthopaedics 2008;22:17-24.
13. Savage R, Risitano G. Flexor tendon repair using a “six strand” method of repair andearly active mobilisation. J Hand Surg 1989;14B:396-9.
14. Savage R. In vitro studies of a new method of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Brit 1985:10:135-41.
15. Seradge H. Elongation of the repair configuration following flexor tendon repair. Hand Surg 1989;8:182-5.
16. Silfverskiöld KL, May EJ. Flexor tendon repair in zone II with a new suture technique and an early mobilization program combining passive and active flexion. J Hand Surg Am 1994:19:53-60.
17. Silverskiold K, May E. Flexor tendon repair in Zone II with a new suture technique and an early mobilisation program combining passive and active flexion. J Hand Surg 1994;19A:53-60.
18. Small J, Brennen M, Colville J. Early active mobilisation following flexor tendon repair in zone 2. J Hand Surg 1989;14B:383-90.
19. Strickland JW, Glogovac SV. Digital function following flexor tendon repair in Zone II: a comparison of immobilisation and controlled passive motion techniques. J Hand Surg 1980:5:537-43.
20. Tang JB, Gu YT, Rice K, et al. Evaluation of four methods of flexor tendon repair for postoperative active mobilisation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001:107:742-9.
21. Tsuge K, Ikuta Y, Matsuishi Y. Repair of flexor tendons by intratendinous suture. J Hand Surg 1977:2:436-40.
22. Urbaniak JD, Cahill JD, Mortenson RA. Tendon suturing methods: analysis of tensile strengths. In Hunter JM, Schneider LH eds, Symposium on Tendon Surgery. St Louis:Mosby 1975:70-80.
23. Van’t Hof A, Heiple KG. Flexor tendon injuries of the fingers and thumb. J Bone Joint Surg 1958;40A:256-62.
24. Wong J, Cerovac S, Ferguson M, McGrouther D. The cellular effect of a single interrupted suture on tendon. J Hand Surg 2006;31B:358-67.