Transdiscal-transcrural celiac plexus block simulated on computed tomography images: Technical parameters that can guide the procedure

Aim: Transdiscal-transcrural celiac plexus block is one of the most effective treatments for chronic upper abdominal pain. This study was done to show that simulated computed tomography (CT) measurements of celiac plexus block may be able to facilitate the practitioner during the procedure.Material and Methods: Thin-section abdomino-pelvic CT images of 100 patients (50 females, 50 males) were retrospectively reviewed. Using special software, the transdiscal-transcrural celiac plexus block was simulated to measure the optimal distance of needle entry from the midline, as well as the optimal needle entry angle and needle tip penetration depth.Results: The optimal needle entry distance from the midline was 4.06 ± 0.66 cm for the right side (RM) and 4.08±0.65 cm for the left side (LM). The mean optimal needle entry angle was 20.17±2.86º on the right side and 20.5±2.33º on the left. The mean optimal needle penetration depth was 11.78±1.22 cm on the right and 11.72±1.18 cm on the left side. No abdominal solid organ penetration was observed on the path of needle advancement.Conclusion: In this study, simulated transdiscal-transcrural celiac plexus block parameters on CT provided guidance to those who performed the procedure. In addition, the absence of any abdominal solid organ penetration in the simulated virtual needle traces supports the hypothesis that the technique has a very low risk of complications.

PDF

___

1. Bahn BM, Erdek MA. Celiac plexus block and neurolysis for pancreatic cancer. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2013;17:310.
2. Kim WH, Lee CJ, Sim WS, et al. Anatomical analysis of computed tomography images for determining the optimal oblique fluoroscope angle for percutaneous coeliac plexus block. J Int Med Res 2011;39:1798-807.
3. Moore DC, Bush WH, Burnett LL. Celiac plexus block: a roentgenographic, anatomic study of technique and spread of solution in patients and corpses. Anesth Analg 1981;60:369-79.
4. Ischia S, Luzzani A, Ischia A, et al. A new approach to the neurolytic block of the coeliac plexus: the transaortic technique. Pain 1983;16:333-41.
5. Kong YG, Shin JW, Leem JG, et al. Computed Tomography (CT) simulated fluoroscopy-guided transdiscal approach in transcrural celiac plexus block. Korean J Pain 2013;26:396-400.
6. Kambadakone A, Thabet A, Gervais DA, et al. CT-guided celiac plexus neurolysis: a review of anatomy, indications, technique, and tips for successful treatment. Radiographics 2011;31:1599-621.
7. Yang IY, Oraee S, Viejo C, et al. Computed tomography celiac trunk topography relating to celiac plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011;36:21-5.
8. Garcia-Eroles X, Mayoral V, Montero A, et al. Celiac plexus block: a new technique using the left lateral approach. Clin J Pain 2007;23:635-7.
9. Loukas M, Klaassen Z, Merbs W, et al. A review of the thoracic splanchnic nerves and celiac ganglia. Clin Anat 2010;23:512-22.
10. De Cicco M, Matovic M, Bortolussi R, et al. Celiac plexus block: injectate spread and pain relief in patients with regional anatomic distortions. Anesthesiology 2001;94:561-5.
11. Wedel DJ, Horlocker TT. Nerve blocks. In: Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, Wiener-Kronish JP, Young WL, eds. Miller’s Anesthesia. 1st edition. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2010. p. 1669.
12. Kobayashi M, Ina H, Imai S, et al. Under CT guided celiac plexus block: Transintervertebral disc approach. Reg Anesth 1992;17:122.
13. Ina H, Kitoh T, Kobayashi M, et al. New technique for the neurolytic celiac plexus block: the transintervertebral disc approach. Anesthesiology 1996;85:212-7.
14. Ina H, Kobayashi M, Narita M, et al. A new approach to neurolytic block of the celiac plexus: Trans-intervertebral disc technique (abstract). Anesthesiology 1991;75:A718.
15. Eksert S, Sir E. Kaudal blok uygulanan pediatrik hastalarda ultrason ile konvansiyonel kör tekniğin karşılaştırılması. CBU-SBED 2019;6:111-4.
16. Sir E, Eksert S. Transaortic celiac plexus block: A computed tomography simulation study. J Surg Med 2019;3:503-6.
17. Weber JG, Brown DL, Stephens DH, et al. Celiac plexus block. Retrocrural computed tomographic anatomy in patients with and without pancreatic cancer. Reg Anesth 1996;2:407-13.
18. Singler RC. An improved technique for alcohol neurolysis of the celiac plexus. Anesthesiology 1982;56:137-41.
19. Joshi G, Gandhi K, Shah N, et al. Peripheral nerve blocks in the management of postoperative pain: challenges and opportunities. J Clin Anesth 2016;35:524-9.
20. Kappis M. Sensibilitat und lokale anasthesie im chirurgischen gebiet der bauchhöhle mit besonderer berücksichtigung der splanchnicus-anasthesie. Beitrag Klinik Chirurg 1919;115:161-75.
21. Moore DC. Celiac (Splanchnic) plexus block with alcohol for cancer pain of the upper intra-abdominal viscera. In: Bonica JJ, Ventafridda V, eds. Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. 1st edition. New York: Raven; 1979. p. 357-71.
22. Boas RA. Sympathetic blocks in clinical practice. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1978;16:149-82.
23. Galizia EJ, Lahiri SK. Paraplegia following coeliac plexus block with phenol. Case report. Br J Anaesth 1974;46:539-40.
24. Eisenberg E, Carr DB, Chalmers TC. Neurolytic celiac plexus block for treatment of cancer pain: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 1995;80:290-5.
25. Brown DL, Bulley CK, Quiel EL. Neurolytic celiac plexus block for pancreatic cancer pain. Anesth Analg 1987;66:869-73.
26. Pereira GA, Lopes PT, Dos Santos AM, et al. Celiac plexus block: an anatomical study and simulation using computed tomography. Radiol Bras 2014;47:283-7.
27. Tewari S, Agarwal A, Dhiraaj S, et al. Comparative evaluation of retrocrural versus transaortic neurolytic celiac plexus block for pain relief in patients with upper abdominal malignancy: a retrospective observational study. Indian J Palliat Care 2016;22:301-6.