The sperm parameters and prediction of IUI success

The sperm parameters and prediction of IUI success

Aim: We aimed to compare the different sperm motility parameters in pregnant and non-pregnant patients who underwent IUI in ourtertiary center.Material and Methods: Total of 110 gonadotrophin plus IUI patients were evaluated between 2017 January and January 2020 inthis retrospective study. Some demographic features and infertility time, post-wash sperm parameters and basal hormone levelswere compared between pregnant and non-pregnant patients and the regression analysis method was used to evaluate IUI successbetween other parameters.Results: Endometrial thickness (9.1±1.4 vs.7.6±1.4 ) on hCG triggering day and , post-wash progressive sperm motility value togetherwith the a ratio and infertility time were correlated well with IUI success (ie pregnacy result ) between 38 pregnant and 72 nonpregnant patients.Conclusion: After wash progressive sperm ratio may predict IUI success with infertility time and endometrial thickness.

___

  • 1. Paul Y S Tay, V R Mohan Raj, A Kulenthran, et al. Prognostic Factors Influencing Pregnancy Rate after Stimulated Intrauterine Insemination. Med J Malaysia 2007;62:4.
  • 2. Lígia FP de Araújo, Edilberto de Araújo Filho, Cássio L Fácio, et al. Paulo CS Matheus6 and Anaglória Pontes2.Efficacy of sperm motility after processing and incubation to predict pregnancy after intrauterine insemination in normospermic individuals. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2013;11:101.
  • 3. Atasever M, Kalem MN, Hatirnaz S, et al. Factors affecting clinical pregnancy rates after IUI for the treatment of unexplained infertility and mild male subfertility. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2016;17:134-8.
  • 4. Yulian Zhao, Nikos Vlahos, David Wyncott, et al.Wallach.Impact of Semen Characteristics on the Success of Intrauterine Insemination.JJ Assist Reprod Genet 2004;21:143-8.
  • 5. Schulte RT, Keller LM, Hiner MR, et al.Temporal decreases in sperm motility: Which patients should have motility checked at both 1 and 2 hours after collection? J Androl 2008;29:558-63.
  • 6. Ruiter-Ligeti J, Agbo C, Dahan M. The impact of semen processing on sperm parameters and pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination. Minerva Ginecol J 2017;69:218-24.
  • 7. Luco SM, Agbo C, Behr B, et al. The evaluation of pre and post processing semen analysis parameters at the time of intrauterine insemination in couples diagnosed with male factor infertility and pregnancy rates based on stimulation agent. A retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 179:159-62.
  • 8. Berna Dilbaz, Enis Ozkaya, Mehmet Cinar, et al. Predictors of Total Gonadotropin Dose Required for Follicular Growth in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation with Intrauterin Insemination Cycles in Patients with Unexplained Infertility or Male Subfertility.Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med 2011;17:28-34.
  • 9. Inci Kahyaoglu, Nafiye Yilmaz.Male Infertility: Causes and Current Developments in Diagnostic Work-Up. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med 2013;19:125-132
  • 10. Miralpeix E, Gonzalez-Comadran M, et al. Efficacy of luteal phase support with vaginal progesterone in intrauterine insemination: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014;31:89- 100
  • 11. Esmailzadeh S, Faramarzi M. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril2007;88:432.
  • 12. Merviel P, Heraud MH, Grenier N, eet al. Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): an analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature. Fertil Steril 2010;93:79-88.
  • 13. Masrour MJ, Yoonesi L, Aerabsheibani H. The effect of endometrial thickness and endometrial blood flow on pregnancy outcome in intrauterine insemination cycles. J Family Med Prim Care 2019;8:2845-9.
  • 14. Van Weert JM, Repping S, Van Voorhis BJ, et al. Performance of the postwash total motile sperm count as a predictor of pregnancy at the time of intrauterine insemination: a meta analysis. Fertil Steril 2004;82:612-20.
  • 15. Ombelet W, Dhont N, Thijssen A, et al. Semen quality and prediction of IUI success in male subfertility: a systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online 2014 ;28:300-9
  • 16. Levi AJ1, Raynault MF, Bergh PA, et al. Reproductive outcome in patients with diminished ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 200;76:666-9.
  • 17. Huyghe S, Verest A, Thijssen A, et al. Influence of BMI and smoking on IUI outcome with partner and donor sperm.Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2017;9:93-100.
  • 18. Ejzenberg D, Gomes TJO, Monteleone PAA, et al. Prognostic factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2019.
  • 19. Erdem A, Erdem M, Atmaca S, et al.. Factors affecting live birth rate in intrauterine insemination cycles with recombinant gonadotrophin stimulation. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;17:199-206.
  • 20. Merviel P, Heraud MH, Grenier N, et al. Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): an analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature. Fertil Steril 2010;93:79-88.
  • 21. Mullin C, Virji N, Saketos M, et al.. Day 2 follicles stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol (E2): could these values be used as markers to predict pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing ovulation induction (OI) therapy with intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles? Fertil Steril 2005;84:162.
  • 22. Dinelli L, Courbière B, Achard V, et al. Prognosis factors of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination with the husband’s sperm: conclusions of an analysis of 2,019 cycles. Fertil Steril 2014;101:994-1000.
  • 23. Alborzi S, Madadi G, Samsami A, et al. Decreased ovarian reserve: any new hope? Minerva Ginecol 2015 ;67:149-67.
  • 24. Sicchieri F, Silva AB, Silva ACJSRE, et al. Prognostic factors in intrauterine insemination cycles. JBRA Assist Reprod 2018;22:2-7.
  • 25. Wu HM, Tzeng CR, Chen CH, et al. Pelvic endometriosis with perito¬neal fluid reduces pregnancy rates in women undergoing intrauterine insemina¬tion. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2013;52:512-5.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: 12
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

N-acetylcysteine reduces oxidative stress on end-organs in an ischemia-reperfusion rat model

Gökalp ALTUN, Zerrin PULATHAN, Süleyman Caner KARAHAN, Esin YULUG

The evaluation of the optic nerve in multiple sclerosis using MRI histogram analysis

Murat BAYKARA, Adil DOĞAN

Predictive value of red cell distrubition width and C reactive protein/albumin ratio in determining severe acute pancreatitis

Orkide KUTLU, Yasemin GÖKDEN

The relationship between betatrophin levels and HbA1c: A case control study

Ferit GURSU, Erhan ONALAN, İhsan SOLMAZ, Buray YAKAR, Mesut KILIÇOĞLU

Clinicopathologic features of operated gastric cancer patients, single center nine years experience

Sinan YOL, Erdal POLAT, Orhan UZUN, Aziz Serkan SENCER, Mürşit DİNCER, Mustafa DUMAN, Kamuran Cumhur DEGER, Hüseyin CİGİLTEPE, Ebubekir GUNDES, Durmus Ali CETIN, Ulas ADAY

Pilonidal disease specimens of 905 patients revealed no malignancy, however we still insist on histopathological examination

Mehmet Eren YUKSEL, Melike ORDU

The effect of midazolam on delirium in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery

Mehmet Kenan EROL, Firdevs KAY, Nazım KANKILIÇ

Detection of viral and bacterial pathogens using multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction in acute gastroenteritis

Melda OZDAMAR, Salih TURKOGLU, Berrin UZUN

Primary low grade chondrosarcoma of the toe; an atypical localization

Recep ÖZTÜRK, Mahmut Nedim AYTEKİN, Barış KAFA, Bülent CELASUN, Enes ULUYARDIMCI, Temel OGUZ, Nihat TOSUN

Determination of acute appendicitis histologic subtypes by MDCT findings

Mesut ÖZTÜRK, Serdar ASLAN