Mesut ÖZTÜRK, Serdar ASLAN

Determination of acute appendicitis histologic subtypes by MDCT findings

Aim: Our aim was to investigate if histological subtypes of acute appendicitis (AA) can be predicted by multidetector computedtomography (MDCT) and laboratory findings.Material and Methods: A retrospective search of the hospital database to identify patients who underwent appendectomy and had anabdominal MDCT scan and laboratory tests including white blood cell (WBC) count and c-reactive protein (CRP) available before theoperation revealed 123 patients (mean age: 25.69 ± 17.23 years). Histopathological results were classified as mucosal, gangrenousand suppurative AA. MDCT scans of the patients were evaluated for appendix diameter, appendix wall thickness, presence of pericecalfluid and extraluminal air. The relationship between MDCT and laboratory findings and histological subtypes of AA were assessed.Results: There were 24 (19.5%) mucosal, 47 (38.2%) suppurative and 52 (42.3%) gangrenous AA. WBC count, CRP level, appendixwall thickness and appendix diameter was significantly different between mucosal and gangrenous AA (p < 0.05) and betweensuppurative and gangrenous AA (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between mucosal and suppurative AA interms of all variables (p = 0.752, 0.551, 0.756, 0.250 and 0.051, respectively). Presence of pericecal fluid was 92.2% sensitive and93.1% specific for gangrenous AA. Presence of extraluminal air was 94.7% sensitive and 97.3% specific for gangrenous AA.Conclusion: AA histologic subtypes can be predicted by especially MDCT findings.

PDF

___

1. DR Flum. Acute appendicitis–appendectomy or the antibiotics first strategy. N Engl J Med 2015;372: 1937-43.
2. Jaschinski T, Mosch C, Eikermann M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 2015;15:48
3. Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN. Safety and efficacy of antibiotics compared with appendicectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: metaanalysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2012; 344:2156.
4. Sallinen V, Akl EA, You JJ, et al. Meta-analysis of antibiotics versus appendicectomy for non-perforated acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 2016;103:656-67.
5. Lahaye MJ, Lambregts DM, Mutsaers E, et al. Mandatory imaging cuts costs and reduces the rate of unnecessary surgeries in the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of having appendicitis. Eur Radiol 2015;25:1464-70.
6. Rosen MP, Ding A, Blake MA, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® right lower quadrant pain-suspected appendicitis. J Am Coll Radiol 2011;8:749-55.
7. Raman SS, Lu DS, Kadell BM, et al. Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:1319-25.
8. Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, et al. Role of leucocyte count, neutrophil percentage and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly. Am Surg 2005;71:344-47.
9. Cikot M, Peker KD, Bozkurt MA, et al. Plasma Calprotectin level:usage in distinction of uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg 2016;11:7.
10. Yu CW, Juan LI, Wu MH, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic acurracy of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white blood cell count for suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 2013;100;322-9.
11. Imaoka Y, Itamoto T, Takakura Y, et al. Validity of predictive factors of acute complicated appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg 2016;11:48.
12. Atema JJ, van Rossem CC, Leeuwenburgh MM, et al. Scoring system to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 2015; 102:979-90.
13. Vonns C, Barry C, Maiter S, et al. Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;377:1573-9.
14. Liu K, Fogg L. Use of antibiotics alone for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Surgery 2011;150:673-83.
15. Al-Gaithy ZK. Clinical value of total white blood cells and neutrophil counts in patients with suspected appendicitis: retrospective study. World J Emerg Surg 2012;7:32.
16. Kahramanca S, Ozgehan G, Seker D, et al. Neutrophilto-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of acute appendicitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2014;20: 19-22.
17. Avanesov M, Wiese NJ, Karul M, et al. Diagnostic Prediction of Complicated Appendicitis by Combined Clinical and Radiological Appendicitis Severity Index (APSI). Eur Radiol 2018;28:3601-10.
18. Van den Broek WT, Bijnen BB, et al. Scoring and diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Eur J Surg. 2002;168:349-54.
19. Christian F, Christian GP. A simple scoring system to reduce the negative appendicectomy rate. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1992;74:281-5.
20. Hansen AJ, Young SW, De Petris G, et al. Histologic severity of appendicitis can be predicted by computed tomography. Arch. Surg. 2004;139:1304-8.
21. Choi D, Park H, Lee YR et al. The most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrastenhanced helical CT. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:574-82.