2013

The exposition of generators and electrodes belonging to the pacemaker in pacemaker dependent patients: A new management method

Aim: In patients with pacemakers, their exposure is often mortal, as there are already patients whose general condition is impaired.In our study, by focusing on our different recommendations and exposition formation mechanisms in case of a need for re-operationwhen exposition and necrosis in the skin flap is observed in 8 patients who were fitted with cardiac pacemakers due to beingdependent on batteries, we shared what could be done in order to prevent it from happening from the beginning.Materials and Methods: Exposed batteries and connections of 8 patients who had admitted due to pacemaker exposition betweenJanuary 2015- March 2017 were carefully dissected and removed. The generator and leads were replaced with new ones and carriedby opening a new subpectoral pocket on the opposite side by creating a subcutaneaus tunnel on the sternum. The area on the leftside where the skin flap with development of necrosis was located was debrided. It was reconstructed with fasciocutaneous flap.Results: All patients were successfully treated. No complications were observed during the follow-up period.Conclusion: In cases where large necrosis develops at the pacemaker exposition and on the skin island, it is an effective treatmentmethod to replace the battery with all its connections due to the biofilm layer formed on it with extracardiac lead and to place it in anew subpectoral pocket opened on the other side by tunnelizing. Since exposition is seen mostly in patients with thin subcutaneousfat tissue, pressure can be mechanically prevented by also involving muscle from the beginning or by placing in deeper tissue.Technically, the greatest advantage of the method that we recommend is that it can be done under local anesthesia.

PDF

___

1. Kiuchi MG, Chen S, Paz LMR, et al. Effectiveness evaluation of ICDs implanted in the right side vs. left side. Int Cardiovascular Forum J 2017.
2. Vanezis AP, Prasad R, Andrews R . Pacemaker leads and cardiac perforation. JRSM Open. 2017;8.
3. Ciloglu NS, Gumus N, Eraslan T, et al. Salvage of the exposed cardiac pacemakers with pocket change and local flaps. Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2014:22;95-8.
4. Aksoy A, Dagdelen D, Sirvan SS. Salvage of the Exposed Cardiac Pacemakers With Fasciocutaneous Local Flaps. The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital Semb 2018;167-9.
5. Timmis CG, Westveer DC. Permanent pacemakers and their complications in perspective. International Journal of Cardiology 1986;13:105-8
6. Shah Arti N. Cardiac implantable electrical devices: management of complications; indications for lead extraction. Decision Support in Med.
7. Bonawitz SC. Management of exposure of cardiac pacemaker systems. Ann Plast Surg 2012;69:292-5.
8. Erin K, Knepp BS, Karan Chopra BA, et al. An effective technique for salvage of cardiac related devices. Eplasty 2012;12:8.
9. Barrett BM Jr, Hallman G Jr, Mullins C. Groin flap coverage for an infant's exposed cardiac pacemaker in complete heart block. Ann Plast Surg 1980;4:227-9.
10. Chait LA, Ritchie B. A method of treating the exposed cardiac pacemaker. Br J Plast Surg 1979;32:281-4.
11. Simpson AM, Rockwell WT, Freedman RA, et al. Salvage of Threatened Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices: Case Series and Review of Literature. Ann Plast Surg 2018;81:340-3.
12. Toia F, D Arpa S, Cordova A, et al. Exposed subcutaneous implantable devices: an operative protocol for management and salvage. Plas Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015;3:343.
13. Kolker AR, Redstone JS, Tutela JP. Salvage of exposed implantable cardiac electrical devices and lead systems with pocket change and local flap coverage. Ann Plast Surg 2007;59:26-9.