Ebru ASMAZ, Asım CİNGİ

The effect of artificial anal band on quality of life of patients with fecal incontinence

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate incontinence levels before and after implantation of an artificial anal band (AAB), and toevaluate the change in quality of life of patients with fecal incontinence.Material and Methods: Patients with fecal incontinence who underwent AAB implantation were included in the study. The CleavelandClinic/Wexner Incontinence Score (CCIS) and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQoL) scales were evaluated before, 2 weeks and5 years post-implantation.Results: Eight patients underwent AAB implantation. The mean±SD pre-operative CCIS decreased significantly (p

PDF

___

1. Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, et al. Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA 1995;274:559-61.
2. Ho YH, Muller R, Veitch C, et al. Faecal incontinence: an unrecognised epidemic in rural North Queensland? Results of a hospital-based outpatient study. Aust J Rural Health 2005;13:28-34.
3. Siproudhis L, Pigot F, Godeberge P, et al. Defecation disorders: a French population survey. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:219-27.
4. Kalantar JS, Howell S, Talley NJ. Prevalence of faecal incontinence and associated risk factors; an underdiagnosed problem in the Australian community? Med J Aust 2002;176:54-7.
5. Enck P, Bielefeldt K, Rathmann W, et al. Epidemiology of faecal incontinence in selected patient groups. Int J Colorectal Dis 1991;6:143-6.
6. Perry S, Shaw C, McGrother C, et al. Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community. Gut 2002;50:480-4.
7. Nelson RL. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 2004;126:S3-7
8. Johanson JF, Lafferty J. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:33-6.
9. Bharuca AE, Zinsmeister AR, Locke GR, et al. Symptoms and quality of life in community women with fecal incontinence. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:1004-9.
10. Dunivan GC, Heymen S, Palsson OS, et al. Fecal incontinence in primary care: prevalence, diagnosis, and health care utilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:493.e1-6.
11. Güngen C, Ertan T, Eker E, et al. Reliability and validity of the standardized mini mental state examination in the diagnosis of mild dementia in turkish population. Turkish J Psych 2002;13:273-81.
12. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77-97.
13. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, et al. Fecal Incontinence quality of life scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:9-17.
14. Dedeli O, Fadiloglu C, Bor S. Validity and reliability of a turkish version of the fecal incontinence quality of life scale. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2009;36:532-8.
15. Altomare DF, Dodi G, La Torre F, et al.Multicentre retrospective analysis of the outcome of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2001;88:1481-6.
16. Lehur PA, Glemain P, Bruley des Varannes S, et al. Outcome of patients with an implanted artificial anal sphincter for severe faecal incontinence. A single institution report. Int J Colorectal Dis 1998;13:88-92.
17. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Gold DM, et al. Clinical, physiological, and radiological study of a new purpose-designed artificial bowel sphincter. Lancet 1998;352:105-9.
18. Wong MT, Meurette G, Stangherlin P, et al. The magnetic anal sphincter versus the artificial bowel sphincter: a comparison of 2 treatments for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2011;54:773-9.
19. Wong WD, Jensen LL, Bartolo DC, et al. Artificial anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1345-51.
20. Dodi G, Melega E, Masin A, et al. Artificial bowel sphincter (ABS) for severe faecal incontinence: a clinical and manometric study. Colorectal Dis 2000;2:207-11.
21. Devesa JM, Rey A, Hervas PL, et al. Artificial anal sphincter: complications and functional results of a large personal series. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1154-63.
22. Michot F, Costaglioli B, Leroi AM, et al. Artificial anal sphincter in severe fecal incontinence: outcome of prospective experience with 37 patients in one institution. Ann Surg 2003;237:52-6.
23. Mundy L, Merlin TL, Maddern GJ, et al. Systematic review of safety and effectiveness of an artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2004;91:665-72.
24. Baumgartner U. The artificial sphincter: therapy for faecal incontinence. Zentralbl Chir 2012;137:340-4.
25. Wong MT, Meurette G, Wyart V, et al. The Artificial Bowel Sphincter A Single Institution Experience Over A Decade. Ann Surg 2011;254:951-6.
26. Wexner SD, Jin HY, Weiss EG, et al. Factors associated with failure of the artificial bowel sphincter: a study of over 50 cases from Cleveland Clinic Florida. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52:1550-7.