Comparison of two different total joint replacement and arthrodesis treatments for advanced hallux rigidus: Shortterm functional outcomes

Comparison of two different total joint replacement and arthrodesis treatments for advanced hallux rigidus: Shortterm functional outcomes

Aim: Hallux rigidus is osteoarthritis of the big toe and is a clinical tableau with progressive pain and movement loss. This studyaims to present the clinical outcomes of patients with grade 3 and 4 hallux rigidus unresponsive to conservative treatment who hadarthroplasty with two different metallic implants or arthrodesis and to compare the outcomes of these treatments.Material and Method: Forty patients with arthroplasty or arthrodesis surgery due to hallux rigidus performed by a single surgeonfrom 2013 to 2018 were retrospectively compared in terms of AOFAS, VAS and ROM measurements and functional scores.Results: When the clinical outcomes of patients with arthroplasty are compared, there was no statistically significant differenceobserved. When the arthrodesis group is compared with the arthroplasty groups, separately and combined, there was no statisticallysignificant differences observed in terms of functional scores.Conclusion: Total joint arthroplasty performed on the big toe offers patients the possibility of a painless metatarsalphalangeal joint(MTPJ) without movement limitations or high complication rates. Arthrodesis is still the most reliable surgical salvage procedure;however, it should be chosen for use as a salvage procedure for stage hallux rigidus that is advanced in terms of function, as withother joints in the musculoskeletal system.

___

  • 1. Ho B, Baumhauer J. Hallux rigidus. EFORT Open Rev 2017;13;2:13-20.
  • 2. Brage ME, Ball ST. Surgical options for salvage of end-stage hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Clin North Am 2002;7:49-73.
  • 3. Gianini S, Ceccarelli F, Faldini C, et al. What’s new in surgical options for hallux rigidus? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86A:72-83.
  • 4. Shereff MJ, Bejjani FJ, Kummer FJ. Kinematics of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1986;68- A:392-8.
  • 5. Ibrahim T, Beiri A, Azzabi M, et al. Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales. J Foot Ankle Surg 2007;46:65-74.
  • 6. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, et al. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 1994;15:349-53.
  • 7. Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS. Hallux rigidus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int 2003;24:731-43.
  • 8. Valentini R, De Fabrizio G, Piovan G. First metatarsophalangeal joint replacement with total arthroplasty in the surgical treatment of the hallux rigidus. Acta Biomed 2014;85:113-7.
  • 9. Hasselman CT, Shields N. Resurfacing of the first metatarsal head in the treatment of hallux rigidus. Tech Foot Ankle Surg 2008;7:31-40.
  • 10. Kennedy JG, Chow FY, Dines J, et al. Outcomes after interpositional arthroplasty for treatment of hallux rigidus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;445:210-5.
  • 11. Gibson JN, Thomson CE. Arthrodesis or total replacement arthroplasty for hallux rigidus: a randomized controlled trial. Foot Ankle Int 2005;26:680-90.
  • 12. Hamilton WG, O’Malley MJ, Thompson FM, et al. Capsular interposition arthroplasty for severe hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int 1997;18:68-70.
  • 13. Gould N. Hallux rigidus: cheilotomy or implant? Foot Ankle1981;1:315-20.
  • 14. Sammarco VJ, Nichols R. Orthotic management for disorders of the hallux. Foot Ankle Clin 2005;10:191-209.
  • 15. Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS. Hallux rigidus: grading and longterm results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85A:2072-88.
  • 16. Yetkin H, Kanatlı U, Song€ur M. Current treatment methods in hallux rigidus. TOTBID J 2006;5:95-100 .
  • 17. Fitzgerald JA, Wilkinson JM. Arthrodesis of the metatarsophalangeal joint of the great toe. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981;157:70-7.
  • 18. Brage ME, Ball ST. Surgical options for salvage of end-stage hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Clin 2002;7:49-73.
  • 19. Dawson-Bowling S, Adimonye A, Cohen A, et al. MOJE ceramic metatarsophalangeal arthroplasty: disappointing clinical results at two to eight years. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33:560-4.
  • 20. Nixon NF, Taylor GJS. Early failure of the Moje implant when used to treat hallux rigidus: the need for regular surveillance. Foot 2008;18:1-6.
  • 21. Cook E, Cook J, Rosenblum B, et al. Meta-analysis of first metatarsophalangeal joint implant arthroplasty. J Foot Ankle Surg 2009;48:180-90.
  • 22. Barwick TW, Talkhani IS. The MOJE total joint arthroplasty for 1st metatarsophalangeal osteoarthritis: a short-term retrospective outcome study. Foot (Edinb) 2008;18:150-5.
  • 23. McGraw IW, Jameson SS, Kumar CS. Mid-term results of the Moje hallux MP joint replacement. Foot Ankle Int 2010;31:592-9.
  • 24. Pulavarti RS, McVie JL, Tullochn CJ. First metatarsophalangeal joint replacement using the Bio- Action great toe implant: intermediate results. Foot Ankle Int 2005;26:1033-7.
  • 25. Raikin SM, Ahmad J, Pour AE, et al. Comparison of arthrodesis and metallichemiarthroplasty of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:1979-85.
  • 26. Sevimli R, Aslantürk O, Ergen E, et al. Mid-Term Outcomes of Arthroscopic Treatment in Patients with a Stiff Elbow. Cureus. 2018;10:e2630
  • 27. Sevimli R, Karakaplan M, Korkmaz MF, et al. Resection Arthroplasty in shoulder joint tuberculosis: a case presentation. Gavin J Case Rep 2016:7-9.
  • 28. Heller WA, Brage ME. The effects of cheilectomy on dorsiflexion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Foot Ankle Int 1997;18:803-8.
  • 29. Erdil M, Elmadağ NM, Polat G, et al. Comparison of arthrodesis, resurfacing hemiarthroplasty, and total joint replacement in the treatment of advanced hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Surg 2013;52:588-93.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Anatomical and functional results of pars plana vitrectomy+ ILM peeling+ gas endotamponade in patients with idiopathic stage 4 macular hole

İlknur TUNCER FIRAT, Seyhan DİKCİ, Turgut YILMAZ, Soner DEMİREL

The effect of artificial anal band on quality of life of patients with fecal incontinence

Ebru ASMAZ, Asım CİNGİ

MgSO4 prophylaxis for obstetric reasons: Traditional solutions vs ready-made solutions

Ibrahim Hakan BUCAK, Mehmet BÜLBÜL

Evaluation of hematological parameters in migraine attack in emergency room

Burak KATİPOGLU, Togay EVRİN

The role of general surgery in consultations of pregnants from obstetrics and gynaecology department

Mehmet İbrahim HARMA, Görker SEL, Müge HARMA, Yusuf GÜNAY

Do inflammation and hormone parameters have effects on IVF results in patients with unexplained infertility?

Pervin KARLI, Ayşe Zehra ÖZDEMİR, Cagri GULUMSER

Accurate calculation of limb length discrepancy using scoliosis radiography

Sefa Giray BATIBAY, Ali Erkan YENİGUL

A rare complication of penile prosthesis: Migration to the posterior gluteal groove

Arif AYDIN, Engin ÖZBAY, İsmail KARLIDAĞ, Emrullah DURMUŞ, Halil Ferat ONCEL, Remzi SALAR

The effect of isotretinoin on depression and anxiety in patients with acne vulgaris: A prospective study

Erhan AYHAN, Suleyman DONMEZDİL

Clinical characteristics and treatment approaches in patients with post-cholecystectomy syndrome due to remnant gallbladder

Kursat DİKMEN, Mustafa SARE, Hasan BOSTANCİ, Ahmet Çağrı BÜYÜKKASAP