The comparison of effects of thiopental and ketofol on emergence agitation in patients with nasal surgery: A prospective, single-blind, randomized clinical trial

The comparison of effects of thiopental and ketofol on emergence agitation in patients with nasal surgery: A prospective, single-blind, randomized clinical trial

Aim: Emergence agitation (EA) is a postanesthetic phenomenon that is common in patients who undergo nasal surgery with generalanesthesia, which manifests itself with confusion and violent behaviors and may cause serious problems such as bleeding in thesurgical site, unplanned removal of catheter or endotracheal tube. In this study, we aimed to compare the effect of thiopental andketofol on EA formation after nasal surgery.Material and Methods: This study was performed as a prospective, randomized, single-blind, clinical trial in 80 patients undergoingnasal surgery. The patients were randomly divided into two groups as thiopental (group P:40) and ketofol (group K:40). As theprimary outcome; Riker Sedation Agitation Scale (RSAS) was used in order to evaluate EA at the 5th minute after extubation. As thesecondary outcome; we aimed to evaluate predisposing factors causing EA.Results: The mean age of the patients was 38.55±13.12 in Group P, while it was 40.68±11.88 in Group K. The incidence of emergenceagitation (EA) was significantly higher in Group P than in Group K. There was a statistically significant difference between the twogroups (Group P:12 cases (30%), Group K:1 case (2.5%), P:0.001). Residual sedation values in PACU were similar in both groups(P:0.248). The duration of stay in PACU was significantly lower in Group P (P:

___

  • 1. Vlajkovic GP, Sindjelic RP. Emergence delirium in children: many questions, few answers. Anesth Analg 2007;104:84-91.
  • 2. Kim HJ, Kim DK, Kim HY, et al. Risk factors of emergence agitation in adults undergoing general anesthesia for nasal surgery. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2015;8:46– 51.
  • 3. Yu D, Chai W, Sun X, et al. Emergence agitation in adults: risk factors in 2,000 patients. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:843-8.
  • 4. Radtke FM, Franck M, Hagemann L, et al. Risk factors for inadequate emergence after anesthesia: emergence delirium and hypoactive emergence. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010;76:394-403.
  • 5. Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S, Tait AR. A prospective cohort study of emergence agitation in the pediatric postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg 2003;96:1625- 30.
  • 6. Riker RR, Picard JT, Fraser GL. Prospective evaluation of the Sedation Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 1999;27:1325–9.
  • 7. Ustun YB, Atalay YO, Koksal E, et al. Thiopental versus ketofol in paediatric sedation for magnetic resonance imaging: A randomized trial. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017;67:247-51.
  • 8. Botero CA, Smith CE, Holbrook C, et al. Total intravenous anesthesia with a propofol-ketamine combination during coronary artery surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2000;14:409-15.
  • 9. Polat R, Peker K, Baran I, et al. Comparison between dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusion in emergence agitation during recovery after nasal surgery: A randomized double-blind trial. Anaesthesist 2015;64:740-6.
  • 10. JA Aldrete, DA Kroulik, A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970;49:924-34.
  • 11. Ramgolam A, Hall GL, Zhang G, et al. Inhalational versus intravenous induction of anesthesia in children with a high risk of perioperative respiratory adverse events: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2018;128:1065-74.
  • 12. Munk L, Andersen G, Moller AM. Postanaesthetic emergence delirium in adults: incidence, predictors and consequences. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016;60:1059-66.
  • 13. Kim SY, Kim JM, Lee JH, et al. Efficacy of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion on emergence agitation and quality of recovery after nasal surgery.Br J Anaesth 2013;111:222-8.
  • 14. Goh PK, Chiu CL, Wang CY, et al. Randomized double blind comparison of ketamine-propofol, fentanylpropofol and propofolsaline on hemodynamics and laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions. Anesth Intensive Care 2005;33:223-8.
  • 15. Krauss B, Green SM. Procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Lancet 2006;367:766-80.
  • 16. Badrinath S, Avramov MN, Shadrick M, et al. The use of a ketamine-propofol combination during monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Analg 2000;90:858-62.
  • 17. Weldon BC, Bell M, Craddock T. The effect of caudal Analgesia on emergence agitation in children after sevoflurane versus halothane anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2004 98:321–6.
  • 18. Jo JY, Jung KW, Kim HJ, et al. Effect of total intravenous anesthesia vs volatile induction with maintenance anesthesia on emergence agitation after nasal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;145:117-23.
  • 19. Steven B. Perioperative ketamine for acute analgesia and beyond. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care 2019;26:67–73.
  • 20. Erhan OL, Göksu H, Alpay C, et al. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007;71:735-9.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The effect of the rapid injection technique without aspiration on pain level in intramuscular vaccination-a single-blind randomized-controlled trial

İlknur GÖL

Evaluation of the effect of oxidized gelatin sponge on pain level in the donor area in free gingival graft operations

Devrim Deniz ÜNER, Bozan Serhat İZOL

Prognostic importance of progesterone receptor expression in meningioma

Onur CEYLAN, Sevilay ÖZMEN

Protective effect of ibuprofen against renal ischemiareperfusion injury

Erdal BENLİ, Ahmet KARATAŞ, Ebru ÇANAKÇI, Tülin BAYRAK, Ahmet BAYRAK, Mürüvvet AKÇAY ÇELİK

A proposal of a hybrid model to predict the secondary protein structures based on amino acid sequences

Muhammed Kamil TURAN, Hasan BAĞCI

Comparison of real-time PCR, indirect immunofluorescence antibody assay, and different staining techniques for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii

Elif Gözde DURGUT, Semra KUŞTİMUR, Merve AYDIN, Ayşe KALKANCI, Funda DOĞURMAN AL

Predictive factors associated mortality after gastrectomy

Uğur TOPAL, Orçun YALAV

The predictive value of laboratory factors in evaluating the necessity of surgical treatment in Crohn’s disease

Emine Özlem GÜR, Elif SARITAŞ YÜKSEL, Selda HACIYANLI, Cem ÇEKİÇ, Osman Nuri DİLEK, Mehmet HACIYANLI

Anterior stafne defect of the mandible

Dilara Nil TOMRUKÇU, Taha Emre KÖSE

The correlation between deformity and metatarsus projection area and the ratios of projection to all metatarsi in direct radiographs in hallux valgus cases

Serkan ÖNER, Meral YEDİGÜL, Zülal ÖNER