RIRS (Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery) is safe and effective in aging male patients: A single surgeon experience

RIRS (Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery) is safe and effective in aging male patients: A single surgeon experience

Aim: Kidney stones are one of the most common diseases around the world. Used together with Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy(ESWL), Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) is the most common method used for kidney stones below 2 cm. The purpose of ourstudy is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RIRS in aging male patients with kidney stones.Material and Methods: Our study contains 213 patients who underwent RIRS in Beylikduzu State Hospital between March 2017 andMarch 2019. Patients were examined retrospectively and divided in four groups according to their age [(between 40 and 49 for Group1), (between 50 and 59 for Group 2), (between 60 and 69 for Group3), (70 and above for Group 4)]. Demographic data, stone size andlocation, and American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) scores of patients have been recorded. Stone-free rate at postoperativemonth 3, hospitalization period, double J (DJ) stenting period, ESWL, or whether they have had a second operation have beenrecorded. ANOVA, Chi-Square tests were used in statistical analysis.Results: Stone characteristics and demographic data of four groups have been examined. Stone size was similar. ASA scoresincreased with increasing age as expected (p=0.001). Patients had similar mean operation period, hospitalization period and DJstenting duration, and no statistically significant difference was detected (p>0.05). Upon examining stone-free rate at postoperativemonth 3, still no statistically significant difference was determined (p>0.05). There was no need for perioperative blood transfusion.Conclusion: These results show that RIRS is an efficient and safe method in elderly male patients with kidney stones. Well-designedstudies with large scales are required for the confirmation of this study.

___

  • 1. Johnson CM, Wilson DM, O’Fallon WM, et al. Renal Stone epidemiology: a 25-year study in Rochester, Minnesota. Kidney Int 1979;16:624-31.
  • 2. Kijvikai K, Haleblian GE, Preminger GM, et al. Shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy fort he management of proximal ureteral calculi: an old discussion revisited. J Urol 2007;178:1157-63.
  • 3. Maltaga BR. Contemporary surgival management of upper urinary tract calculi. J Urol 2009;181:2418-34.
  • 4. Galvin DJ, Pearle MS. The contemporary management of renal and ureteric calculi. BJU Int 2006;98:1283-8.
  • 5. Besiroglu H, Merder E, Dedekarginoglu. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is safe and effective in aging male patients : a single center experience. G.Aging Male 2019;12:1-6.
  • 6. Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2007;51:899- 906.
  • 7. Ekici M,Ozgur BC,Senturk AB et al. Efficacy and Reliability of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Treatment of Pediatric Kidney Stones. Cureus 2018;10:3719.
  • 8. Sarikaya S,Ebiloglu T, Selvi I et al. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery or percutaneous nephrolithotomy :Which one is more effective for 1-2 cm renal stones in the pediatric patients? Arch Esp Urol 2019;72:54-60.
  • 9. Samotyjek J, Jurkiewicz B, Krupa A.Surgical treatment methods of urolithiasis in the pediatric population. Dev Period Med 2018;22:88-93.
  • 10. Halachmi S, Meretyk S.Shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones in elderly male patients. Aging Male 2006;9:171-4.
  • 11. Ozturk H.Tubeless versus standard PCNL in geriatric population. Actas Urol Esp. 2015;39:494-501.
  • 12. Kumar S, Keshavanurthy R, Karthikeyan V.S et al. Complications after prone PCNL in pediatric, adult and geriatric patients - a single center experience over 7 years. Int Braz J Urol 2017;43:704-12.
  • 13. Lee LC,Violette PD,Tailly T et al. A comparison of outcomes after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children and adults: a matched cohort study. J Pediatr Urol 2015;11:250.
  • 14. Berardinelli F, De Francesco P., Marchione M et al. RIRS in the elderly: Is it feasible and safeInt J Surg 2017;42:147-51.
  • 15. Tolga-Gulpinar M,Resorlu B,Atis G et al . Safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients of different age groups. Actas Urol Esp. 2015;39:354-9.
  • 16. Gokcen K,Dundar G,Bagcioglu M et al.Safety and Efficacy of RIRS in Geriatric Patients: A Comparative Evaluation on an Age Based Manner.Urol J 2019.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Comparison of the effects of supreme laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube on airway reflexes in patients who underwent nasal surgery: A randomized, controlled clinical trial

Erol KARAASLAN

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in children: Clinical, imaging, laboratory findings and evaluation of relation to the platelet indices

Dilek SAĞLAM

The association between tacrolimus blood levels and possible neurotoxicity following liver transplantation

Elvan Onur KIRIMLAR, Hakan KUMBASAR, Berker DUMAN, Meltem Bingöl KOLOĞLU, Oğuzhan HERDİ, Burçin ÇOLAK, Mehmet Kaan KARAYALÇIN, Deniz BALCI

Association of laryngopharyngeal reflux with nasal obstruction

Hasan ÇAKAR, Sami BERÇİN, Ergun SEVİL, Muzaffer KIRIŞ

The comparison of readability between information texts from web sites of private clinics and private hospitals

İhsan KUZUCU

A rare cause of recurrent nasal polyposis in adolescent age group: Samter’s syndrome

Cem ALATA, Erdem TOPAL

Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy in a community based teaching hospital: The role of dual-phase parathyroid scintigraphy and surgeon experience

Talha SARIGÖZ, Tamer ERTAN, Ömer TOPUZ, Uğur AYDEMİR

Does melatonin as an irrigation solution increase the adhesive quality of root canal sealer?

Emrah KARATAŞLIOĞLU, Samet TOSUN

Prevalence and predictive factors of anxiety, depression and death anxiety in patients over 50-years of age at the tertiary care cancer center

Recep ÖZTÜRK, İsmail Burak ATALAY, Aliekber YAPAR, Mehmet Akif ŞİMŞEK, Eray ERTÜRK ENGİN, Bedii Şafak GÜNGÖR

Correlation between histopathological results and BI-RADS classification in breast masses

Burhan Hakan KANAT, Nizamettin KUTLUER, Ali Aksu, Hülagu KARGICI, Ferhat ÇAY, Ayşe Azak BOZAN, Mehmet Buğra BOZAN