Prognostic value of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in primary tumor and reticuloendothelial system in patients with head and neck cancer

Prognostic value of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in primary tumor and reticuloendothelial system in patients with head and neck cancer

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of FDG uptake in primary tumor and reticuloendothelial system at 18 Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography / computed tomography (18F-FDG PET / CT) in patients with head and neck cancer.Materials and Methods: A total of 56 head and neck cancer patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET / CT imaging in our clinic for staging were included in study. A circular volume of interest (VOI) was drawn which include tumor tissue on axial images and thereafter SUVmax value of the primary tumor was measured. Bone marrow SUVmax was measured at Lumbal 3-5 th vertebraes. Bone marrow-to-liver uptake ratio (BLR) value was calculated by dividing the bone marrow SUVmax value to liver SUVmax. Bone marrow-to-spleen uptake ratio (BSR) ratio value was calculated by dividing bone marrow SUVmax value to the spleen SUVmax.Results: Forty-five were male and 11 were female of the 56 patients included in the study. The average age was 62.71 ± 14.3. The SUVmax value of primary tumor and age had a significant predictive value in terms of overall survival (p = 0.027 and p = 0.037, respectively). There was a significant difference in overall survival when using 13.6 cut off for SUVmax and 65.5 cut off for age (p = 0.005, p = 0.019, respectively). Age (≥65.5), distant metastasis and SUVmax of primary tumor (≥13.6) values were independent prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. The bone marrow SUVmax value and BLR and BSR ratios of the patients did not have a significant prognostic value in both univariate and multivariate analysis.Conclusion: The SUVmax value of the primary tumor in 18F-FDG PET / CT in patients with head and neck cancer, had both predictive and independent prognostic value. Bone marrow SUVmax, BLR and BSR values which shows FDG uptake on RES system, were not predictive and prognostic.

___

  • 1. Cohen N, Fedewa S, Chen AY. Epidemiology and Demographics of the Head and Neck Cancer Population. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2018;30:381-95.
  • 2. Rettig EM, D'Souza G. Epidemiology of head and neck cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2015;24:379-96.
  • 3. Chow LQM. Head and Neck Cancer. N Engl J Med 2020;382:60-72.
  • 4. Seeburg DP, Baer AH, Aygun N. Imaging of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: From Staging to Surveillance. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2018;30:421-33.
  • 5. Goel R, Moore W, Sumer B, et al. Clinical Practice in PET/ CT for the Management of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017;209:289-303.
  • 6. Kim SA, Roh JL, Kim JS, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT surveillance for the detection of recurrence in patients with head and neck cancer. Eur J Cancer 2017;72:62- 70.
  • 7. Huang Y, Feng M, He Q, et al. Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET-CT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96: 6721.
  • 8. Yoon HJ, Kim BS, Moon CM, et al. Prognostic value of diffuse splenic FDG uptake on PET/CT in patients with gastric cancer. PLoS One. 2018;13:0196110.
  • 9. Bang JI, Yoon HJ, Kim BS. Clinical utility of FDG uptake within reticuloendothelial system on F-18 FDG PET/ CT for prediction of tumor recurrence in breast cancer. PLoS One. 2018;13:0208861.
  • 10. Sahin E, Elboga U. Relationship between reticuloendothelial systems' FDG uptake level and clinicopathological features in patient with invasive ductal breast cancer. Radiol Med 2017;122:785-92.
  • 11. Dolan RD, Laird BJA, Horgan PG, et al. The prognostic value of the systemic inflammatory response in randomised clinical trials in cancer: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018;132:130-7.
  • 12. Lee JW, Ban MJ, Park JH, et al. Effect of F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake by Bone Marrow on the Prognosis of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Clin Med 2019;8:1169.
  • 13. Szyszko TA, Cook GJR. PET/CT and PET/MRI in head and neck malignancy. Clin Radiol 2018;73:60-9.
  • 14. Rohde M, Nielsen AL, Pareek M, et al. A PET/CT-Based Strategy Is a Stronger Predictor of Survival Than a Standard Imaging Strategy in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Nucl Med 2018;59:575-81.
  • 15. Sheikhbahaei S, Ahn SJ, Moriarty E, et al. Intratherapy or Posttherapy FDG PET or FDG PET/CT for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prognostic Studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;205:1102-13.
  • 16. Huang Y, Feng M, He Q, et al. Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET-CT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96: 6721.
  • 17. Rasmussen JH, Vogelius IR, Fischer BM, et al. Prognostic value of 18F-fludeoxyglucose uptake in 287 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2015;37:1274-81.
  • 18. Pak K, Cheon GJ, Kang KW, et al. Prognostic value of SUVmean in oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers: comparison with SUVmax and other volumetric parameters of 18F-FDG PET. Clin Nucl Med 2015;40:9-13.
  • 19. Guthrie GJ, Charles KA, Roxburgh CS, et al. The systemic inflammation-based neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio: experience in patients with cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2013;88:218-30.
  • 20. Jeong SY, Kim SJ, Pak K, et al. Prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose bone marrow uptake in patients with solid tumors: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:12859.
  • 21. Lee JW, Baek MJ, Ahn TS, et al. Fluorine-18- fluorodeoxyglucose uptake of bone marrow on PET/ CT can predict prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer after curative surgical resection. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;30:187-94.
  • 22. Cicone F, Loose D, Deron P, et al. Prognostic value of FDG uptake by the bone marrow in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Nucl Med Commun 2008;29:431-5.
  • 23. Bossi P, Alfieri S, Strojan P, et al. Prognostic and predictive factors in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A review of the literature. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019;137:84-91.
  • 24. Cadoni G, Giraldi L, Petrelli L, et al. Prognostic factors in head and neck cancer: a 10-year retrospective analysis in a single-institution in Italy. Fattori prognostici del tumore testa-collo: un’analisi retrospettiva monocentrica di 10 anni. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2017;37:458-66.
  • 25. Xie JD, Chen F, He YX, et al. Old age at diagnosis increases risk of tumor progression in nasopharyngeal cancer. Oncotarget 2016;7:66170-81.
  • 26. Jeske SS, Schuler PJ, Doescher J, et al. Age-related changes in T lymphocytes of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Immun Ageing 2020;17:3.
  • 27. Duprez F, Berwouts D, De Neve W, et al. Distant metastases in head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2017;39:1733-43.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: 12
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Genotype phenotype correlation of cadasil patients-single center experience

Alper Han ÇEBİ, Cavit BOZ

IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility

Özlem MORALOĞLU TEKİN, Emre BASER, Nefise Nazli YENİGÜL, Berna DİLBAZ, Runa ÖZELCİ, Oya ALDEMİR, Serdar DİLBAZ

The value of laboratory markers in the differential diagnosis of acute vestibular syndrome

Bilgehan DEMİR, Şeyda Tuba SAVRUN, Emre GÖKÇEN

Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth restored with novel CAD/CAM ceramic post systems

Evren SARIYILDIZ, Doğu Ömür DEDE, Ersan ÇELİK, Fatih ÇAKICI, Elif Bahar ÇAKICI, Ayça TULGA, Çiğdem KAHVECİ

Acute renal injury due to rhabdomyolysis: A tertiary hospital experience

Eşref ARAC, İhsan SOLMAZ, Nazım EKİN, Songül ARAÇ, Enver YÜKSEL

Experience of a single center with 472 vertebral augmentation surgery in 356 patients

Fikret ŞAHİNTÜRK, Erkin SÖNMEZ, Mehmet Nur ALTINORS

Evaluation of long-term mortality in patients with stable angina pectoris whose SYNTAX score was found to be zero in coronary angiography

Cengiz BURAK, Doğan İLİŞ, Ahmet KARAKURT

Comparison of the administration of dual and standard trigger in patients undergoing IVF Treatment

Abdullah KARAER, Fatih YİĞİT, Görkem TUNCAY

The importance of measuring the uncertainty of HbA1c analysis

Mehmet KALAYCI, Hakan AYYILDIZ

Monocyte count / HDL cholesterol ratio: A new marker in diabetic retinopathy

İhsan SOLMAZ, Mine KARAHAN