Evren SARIYILDIZ, Doğu Ömür DEDE, Ersan ÇELİK, Fatih ÇAKICI, Elif Bahar ÇAKICI, Ayça TULGA, Çiğdem KAHVECİ

Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth restored with novel CAD/CAM ceramic post systems

Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate the fracture strength (FS) and fracture types of endodontically treated teeth that restored with CAD/CAM made novel ceramic posts.Materials and Methods: Seventy human maxillary central incisors were selected, endodontically treated and expanded to 1.8 mm diameter with leaving of 2-3 mm canal filling. The teeth were randomly divided into 7 post restoration groups (n=10); a glass fiber post system as control (GFbr), monolithic zirconia (GMzr), lithium disilicate (GLds), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (GZr_Lds) ceramics, nanoparticle-filled (GRmc_Cer), resin nano-ceramic (GRmc_Lu), and polymer-infiltrated (GRmc_En) resin matrix ceramic groups. Then composite cores were build-up, crown restorations fabricated, and incubated in a water bath (37 ± 10C, 24 hours). A dynamic load was applied at 135° to the long axis of each specimen with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. FS and fracture types (favorable-catastrophic) were recorded. The FS values were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (α=.05). Results: While the FS values of GMzr (365.62 ± 28.52 N) was significantly higher than GFbr (261.07 ± 24.51 N), all other groups (167.09-191.64 N) significantly lower, according to the Tukey HSD (P

PDF

___

1. Pontius O, Nathanson D, Giordano R, et al. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems and endodontically treated incisors without coronoradicular reinforcement. J Endod 2002;28:710-5.
2. Heydecke G, Butz F, Hussein A, et al. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:438-45.
3. Lamichhane A, Xu C, Zhang FQ. Dental fiber-post resin base material: a review. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:60- 5.
4. Pang J, Feng C, Zhu X, et al. Fracture behaviors of maxillary central incisors with flared root canals restored with CAD/CAM integrated glass fiber postand- core. Dent Mater J 2019;38:114-9.
5. Sary SB, Samah MS, Walid AZ. Effect of restoration technique on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated anterior teeth with flared root canals. J Biomed Res 2019;33:131-8.
6. Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:431-47.
7. Stankiewicz NR, Wilson PR. The ferrule effect: a literature review. Int Endod J 2002;35:575-81.
8. Maccari PC, Cosme DC, Oshima HM, et al. Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with flared root canals and restored with different post systems. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19:30-7.
9. Pereira JR, do Valle AL, Shiratori FK, et al. The effect of post material on the characteristic strength of fatigued endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1225-30.
10. Bankoğlu Güngör M, Turhan Bal B, Yilmaz H, et al. Fracture strength of CAD/CAM fabricated lithium disilicate and resin nano ceramic restorations used for endodontically treated teeth. Dent Mater J 2017;36:135-41.
11. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, et al. Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:18-22.
12. Ozcan N, Sahin E. In vitro evaluation of the fracture strength of all-ceramic core materials on zirconium posts. Eur J Dent 2013;7:455-60.
13. Dede DÖ, Armaganci A, Ceylan G, et al. Influence of abutment material and luting cements color on the final color of all ceramics. Acta Odontol Scand 2013;71:1570-8.
14. Ozkurt Z, Işeri U, Kazazoğlu E. Zirconia ceramic post systems: a literature review and a case report. Dent Mater J 2010 29:233-45.
15. Dikbas I, Tanalp J. An overview of clinical studies on fiber post systems. Scientific World Journal 2013;2013:171380.
16. Ray BC. Thermal shock and thermal fatigue on delamination of glass-fiber-reinforced polymeric composites. J of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 2005;24:111-6.
17. Zhang Y, Lee JJ, Srikanth R, et al. Edge chipping and flexural resistance of monolithic ceramics. Dent Mater 2013;29:1201-8.
18. Malkondu O, Tinastepe N, Akan E, et al. An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 2016;30:644-52.
19. Carrabba M, Keeling AJ, Aziz A, et al. Translucent zirconia in the ceramic scenario for monolithic restorations: A flexural strength and translucency comparison test. J Dent 2017;60:70-6.
20. Elsayed A, Wille S, Al-Akhali M, et al. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:20-7.
21. Matsuzaki F, Sekine H, Honma S, et al. Translucency and flexural strength of monolithic translucent zirconia and porcelain-layered zirconia. Dent Mater J 2015;34:910-7.
22. Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:587-93.
23. Fasbinder DJ, Dennison JB, Heys D, et al. A clinical evaluation of chairside lithium disilicate CAD/ CAM crowns: a two-year report. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:10-4.
24. Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM. Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Dent Mater 2016;32:908-14.
25. Çelik E, Sahin SC, Dede DÖ. Shear bond strength of nanohybrid composite to the resin matrix ceramics after different surface treatments. Photomed Laser Surg 2018;36:424-30.
26. Chen C, Trindade FZ, de Jager N, et al. The fracture resistance of a CAD/CAM Resin Nano Ceramic and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses. Dent Mater 2014;30:954-62.
27. Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, et al. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J 2014;33:705-10.
28. Varvara G, Perinetti G, Di Iorio D, et al. In vitro evaluation of fracture resistance and failure mode of internally restored endodontically treated maxillary incisors with differing heights of residual dentin. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:365-72.