IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility

IVF/ICSI outcomes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients with unexplained infertility

Aim: To compare IVF-ICSI outcomes in single-versus-double lumen oocyte retrieval needles in patients diagnosed with unexplained infertilityMaterials and Methods: A total of 188 patients aged 23-33 years who were diagnosed as unexplained infertility and underwent IVF/ICSI treatment were included and divided into two groups according to whether the catheter used in oocyte collection was single or double lumened: group 1 patients with single lumen (n: 59) and group 2 patients with double lumen (n:129). In addition, patients were divided into two subgroups according to the treatment protocol: antagonist protocol (n:134; 45 patient in group 1 and 89 patient in group 2) and long agonist protocol (n:54; 14 patient in group 1 and 40 patient in group 2). Results: Implantation rate (32.2% vs. 48.1%, p:0.042) clinical pregnancy rate (25.4% vs. 41.9%, p:0.03) and live birth rate (17.2% vs. 28.6%, p: 0.011) were higher in patients to whom double-lumen was used. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, double lumen use was found to be an independent predictor for clinical pregnancy (p = 0.041). According to the treatment protocol; clinical pregnancy rates (15 (25.4%) vs. 54 (41.9%), p: 0.011) and live birth rates (8 (13.6%) vs. 40 (31.0%), p: 0.030) of patients to whom double lumen was used during oocyte pick-up after the antagonist protocol were significantly higher. Conclusion: Our study showed that the use of double lumen increased implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate and it is evaluated as an independent factor that increases IVF/ICSI outcomes.

___

  • 1. Levy G, Hill MJ, Ramirez CI, et al. The use of follicle flushing during oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human reproduction 2012;27:2373-9.
  • 2. Wongtra-ngan S, Vutyavanich T, Brown J. Follicular flushing during oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010.
  • 3. Levens ED, Whitcomb BW, Payson MD, et al.Ovarian follicular flushing among low-responding patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2009;91:1381-4.
  • 4. Haydardedeoglu B, Cok T, Kilicdag EB, et al. Invitro fertilization–intra cytoplasmic sperm injectionout comes in single-versus double-lumen oocyte retrieval needles in normally responding patients: a randomized trial. Fertil Steril 2011;95:812-4.
  • 5. Sharara FI, Mcclamrock HD. High estradiol levels and high oocyte yield are not detrimental to in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1999;72:401-5.
  • 6. Haydardedeoglu B, Gjemalaj F, Aytac PC, et al. Direct aspiration versus follicular flushing in poor responders undergoing intra cytoplasmic sperm injection: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG: An International J Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2017;124:1190-6.
  • 7. Georgiou EX, Melo P, Brown J, et al. Follicular flushing during oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018.
  • 8. Neumann K, Griesinger G. Follicular flushing in patients with poor ovarian response: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reproductive biomedicine online 2018;36:408-15.
  • 9. Von Horn K, Depenbusch M, Schultze-Mosgau A, et al. Randomized, open trial comparing a modified double-lumen needle follicular flushing system with a single-lumen aspiration needle in IVF patients with poor ovarian response. Human Reproduction 2017;32: 832-5.
  • 10. Kovacs G. Oocyte collection. In: Gardner, D. K., Weissman, A., Howles, C. M., Shoham, Z, Eds. Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques: Volume 2: Clinical Perspectives. 5th edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2018;604-11.
  • 11. Hill MJ, Levens ED. Is there a benefit in follicularflushing in assisted reproductive technology? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2010;22:208-12.
  • 12. Lozano DHM, Scheffer JB, Frydman N, et al. Optimal reproductive competence of oocytes retrieved through follicular flushing in minimal stimulation IVF. Reproductive biomedicine online 2008;16:119-23.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: 12
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The intersection of two global problems: Refugees and inborn errors of metabolism

Saliha ŞENEL, Mustafa KILIÇ, Asburce OLGAC, Çiğdem Seher KASAPKARA, Nazlı GÜLENÇ, Leyla TÜMER

Evaluation of long-term mortality in patients with stable angina pectoris whose SYNTAX score was found to be zero in coronary angiography

Cengiz BURAK, Doğan İLİŞ, Ahmet KARAKURT

Evaluation of psychiatric consultations requested for cancer patients hospitalized in a university hospital

Neslihan CANSEL, Ahmet ÜNAL

Comparison of the administration of dual and standard trigger in patients undergoing IVF Treatment

Abdullah KARAER, Fatih YİĞİT, Görkem TUNCAY

Combined treatment of cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil Induces cell death in ARPE-19 cells through the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway

Oğuzhan DOĞANLAR, Zeynep Banu DOĞANLAR, Ayten DOĞAN

DJ stent and nephrostomy drainage outcomes for upper urinary tract obstruction and determinative factors for drainage selection

Yavuz GÜLER

Comparison of loose silk and tightenable polypropylene seton placement in treatment of complex anal fistula

Yahya ÇELİK, Mehmet Zeki BULDANLI

Nutrition and stress: Two important external factors in polymyalgia rheumatica

Fazıl KULAKLI, Gökhan ÇAĞLAYAN

Experience of a single center with 472 vertebral augmentation surgery in 356 patients

Fikret ŞAHİNTÜRK, Erkin SÖNMEZ, Mehmet Nur ALTINORS

Comparison of platelet count and mean platelet volume values before and after treatment in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis patients receiving tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor therapy

Şevki KONUR, Refik DEMİRTUNÇ