Effect of enteral nutritional support on nutritional status ofpatients with gastric cancer receiving chemoradiotherapyafter gastrectomy

Effect of enteral nutritional support on nutritional status ofpatients with gastric cancer receiving chemoradiotherapyafter gastrectomy

Aim: To evaluate the effects of enteral nutritional support in gastric cancer patients who received chemoradiotherapy (CRT) after gastrectomy.Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent total/subtotal gastrectomy due to gastric cancer and received postoperative CRT between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015 at Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University Faculty of Medicine General Surgery Clinic were included in the study. The nutritional risk of patients was recorded using NRS-2002. The values of patients at the scheduled routine clinical follow-up at the end of the first year were compared with baseline values.Results: While 64.7% (n=22) of the patients continued to receive enteral nutritional support regularly (CNS group), 35.3% of the patients (n=12) discontinued nutritional support (DNS group). Patients in the DNS group had significantly lower baseline NRS-2002 scores (p=0.049). The NRS-2002 score of the CNS group decreased significantly at follow-up compared to the pre-CRT values. At the end of the first year, statistically significant increases were found in body weight, body mass index, transferrin level and vitamin D level of both patient groups. While the mean RBC count decreased significantly in the CNS group (p=0.002), there was no significant difference in the DNS group (p=0.382). When the amount of temporal change in RBC was evaluated, there was a significant difference between the DNS and CNS groups. Although vitamin B12 level and urea level increased in both groups, this increase was significant only in the DNS group (p = 0.049). Conclusions: In this study, it was determined that gastric cancer patients who continued enteral nutrition in the first year after CRT had significantly higher nutritional risk before CRT. Enteral nutrition reduces nutritional risk and shows positive results on nutritional parameters such as body weight, ferritin, transferrin, vitamin D, vitamin B12.

___

  • 1. Chow R, Bruera E, Arends J, et al. Enteral and parenteral nutrition in cancer patients, a comparison of complication rates: an updated systematic review and (cumulative) meta-analysis. Supportive Care in Cancer 2020;28:979-1010.
  • 2. Davis JL, Selby LV, Chou JF, et al. Patterns and Predictors of Weight Loss After Gastrectomy for Cancer. Annals of surgical oncology 2016;23:1639- 45.
  • 3. Lee SE, Lee JH, Ryu KW, et al. Changing pattern of postoperative body weight and its association with recurrence and survival after curative resection for gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2012;59:430- 5.
  • 4. Sierzega M, Choruz R, Pietruszka S, et al. Feasibility and outcomes of early oral feeding after total gastrectomy for cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2015;19:473-9.
  • 5. Klek S, Scislo L, Walewska E, et al. Enriched enteral nutrition may improve short-term survival in stage IV gastric cancer patients: A randomized, controlled trial. Nutrition 2017;36:46-53.
  • 6. Dou L, Wang X, Cao Y, et al. Relationship between Postoperative Recovery and Nutrition Risk Screened by NRS 2002 and Nutrition Support Status in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer. Nutr Cancer 2020;72:33- 40.
  • 7. Sun Z, Kong X-J, Jing X, et al. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 as a Predictor of Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. PloS one 2015;10:e0132857-e.
  • 8. Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, et al. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr 2003;22:321-36.
  • 9. Ryu SW, Kim IH. Comparison of different nutritional assessments in detecting malnutrition among gastric cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:3310- 7.
  • 10. Li YF, Nie RC, Wu T, et al. Prognostic Value of the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 Scale in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Large-Scale Cohort Study. J Cancer 2019;10:112-9.
  • 11. Arends J, Bodoky G, Bozzetti F, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Non-surgical oncology. Clin Nutr 2006;25:245-59.
  • 12. Yu W, Seo B, Chung H. Postoperative body-weight loss and survival after curative resection for gastric cancer. British J Surg 2002;89:467-70.
  • 13. Aoyama T, Yoshikawa T, Shirai J, et al. Body weight loss after surgery is an independent risk factor for continuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:2000-6.
  • 14. Chen W, Zhang Z, Xiong M, et al. Early enteral nutrition after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2014;23:607-11.
  • 15. Wang J, Yang M, Wang Q, et al. Comparison of Early Oral Feeding With Traditional Oral Feeding After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Front Oncol 2019;9:1194.
  • 16. Froghi F, Sanders G, Berrisford R, et al. A randomised trial of post-discharge enteral feeding following surgical resection of an upper gastrointestinal malignancy. Clin Nutr 2017;36:1516-9.
  • 17. Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:1471-4.
  • 18. Hu Y, Kim HI, Hyung WJ, et al. Vitamin B(12) deficiency after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an analysis of clinical patterns and risk factors. Annals of Surg 2013;258:970-5.
  • 19. Lim CH, Kim SW, Kim WC, et al. Anemia after gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: long-term follow-up observational study. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:6114-9.
  • 20. Cho M, Son T, Kim HI, et al. Similar hematologic and nutritional outcomes after proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in comparison to total gastrectomy for early upper gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2019;33:1757-68.
  • 21. Seo HS, Jung YJ, Kim JH, et al. Long-Term Nutritional Outcomes of Near-Total Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer Treatment: a Comparison with Total Gastrectomy Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis. J Gastric Cancer 2018;18:189-99.
  • 22. Bae JM, Park JW, Yang HK, et al. Nutritional status of gastric cancer patients after total gastrectomy. World J Surg 1998;22:254-60; discussion 60-1.
  • 23. Bozzetti F, Ravera E, Cozzaglio L, et al. Comparison of nutritional status after total or subtotal gastrectomy. Nutrition 1990;6:371-5.
  • 24. Hsu PI, Chuah SK, Lin JT, et al. Taiwan nutritional consensus on the nutrition management for gastric cancer patients receiving gastrectomy. J Formos Med Assoc 2019.
  • 25. Kim HI, Hyung WJ, Song KJ, et al. Oral vitamin B12 replacement: an effective treatment for vitamin B12 deficiency after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:3711-7.
  • 26. Fujiya K, Kawamura T, Omae K, et al. Impact of Malnutrition After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer on Long-Term Survival. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25.
  • 27. Ding D, Feng Y, Song B, et al. Effects of preoperative and postoperative enteral nutrition on postoperative nutritional status and immune function of gastric cancer patients. Turk J Gastroenterol 2015;26:181-5.
  • 28. Al-Mutawa A, Al-Sabah S, Anderson AK, et al. Evaluation of Nutritional Status Post Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy—5-Year Outcomes. Obesity Surgery 2018;28:1473-83.
  • 29. Nozaki I, Hato S, Kobatake T, et al. Long-term outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer compared with total gastrectomy. World J Surg 2013;37:558-64.
  • 30. Park YO, Yoon S, Kang S, et al. Nutritional Status and Dietary Change after Gastrectomy of Gastric Cancer Patients. Korean J Community Nutrition 2012;17:101.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The association of lymph node involvement withlenfovascular invasion, perineural invasion andperitumoral lymphocytic reaction in surgically treatedcolon cancer patients

Orhan ALİMOĞLU, Tamer AKAY, İbrahim Ali ÖZEMİR, Tunç EREN, Mustafa DEMİR, Süleyman ORMAN, Haydar YALMAN, Rafet YİĞİTBAŞI

Evaluation of the relationship between sociodemographiccharacteristics, quality of life, depression, drugcompliance and biochemical parameters in patients withthalassemia major in Isparta

Emine GÜÇHAN ALANOĞLU, Aslıhan BADUR, Demircan ÖZBALCI

The association of non-motor symptoms with motorsymptoms in parkinson’s disease

Şeyda ÇANKAYA

TROP2 and SOX-10 expression in the differential diagnosisof bladder tumors

İsmail HARMANKAYA, Nevzat Serdar UĞRAŞ, Sümeyye Nur TATAROĞLU

The microbiology of acute cholangitis and associatedin-hospital mortality

Gülay OKAY, Elmas BİBERCİ KESKİN

The healing effects of prp and thymoquinone on dssinduced inflammatory bowel disease in rats

Hüseyin ÖZDEN, Gökhan KARACA

Investigation of piwil2 expression as a biomarker in solidtumors of childhood

Yılmaz SEÇİLMİŞ, Musa KARAKÜKÇÜ, Özlem CANÖZ

Evaluation of clinicopathological characteristics andprognosis of lung ınvasive mucinous adenocarcinomasbased on computed tomography (CT) findings

Halide Nur ÜRER, Nurcan ÜNVER, Neslihan AKANIL FENER

Glucose metabolism and oncogenes in cancer

Cuma MERTOĞLU

Relationship of neuropathic pain component andosteoarthritis stage in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Raikan BÜYÜKAVCI, İbrahim ÇATMA