Does mesh utilization in femoral hernia repair affect recurrence?

Does mesh utilization in femoral hernia repair affect recurrence?

Aim: The mechanism of how femoral hernias (FH) develop is not clear. As a result of increased intra-abdominal pressure, preperitonealfat tissue passes through the femoral ring and also drags the pelvic peritoneum.Femoral hernias are more common in women and also approximately 60% occur on the right, 30% on the left side and 10% arebilateral. The chief complaints of the patients are swelling and pain in the groin. Most cases require emergency operation due toincanceration or strangulation. Hernia repair can be performed with or without mesh, and with open or laparoscopic techniques.In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the recurrence rates in patients who underwent FH repair with and without mesh.Material and Methods: This is a retrospective study of 48 patients who underwent surgery due to FH in our clinic between January2012 and October 2017. The patients were divided into two groups according to mesh utilization: Hernia repair with mesh (Group 1)and hernia repair without mesh (Group 2).Results: A total of 48 patients with FH were operated (35 females, 13 males). The mean age of the patients was 64.6 ± 18.3 yearsand, 31 patients (64.5%) had right-sided and 17 patients (35.5%) had left-sided hernia.When the groups were compared, there was a statistically significant difference in terms of comorbidity, length of hospital stay andmorbidity. There was no significant difference in recurrence (recurrence rates: 6.3%, 6.3%, respectively).Conclusion: Currently, mesh and non-mesh repairs are commonly used for the treatment of FH. This study showed that absence ofmesh in FH repair did not affect recurrence.

___

  • 1. Dahlstrand U, Wollert S, Nordin P, et al. Emergency femoral hernia repair: a study based on a national register. Ann Surg 2009;249:672.
  • 2. Mahajan A, Luther A. Incarcerated femoral hernia in male: a rare case report. Int Surg J 2014;1:25–6.
  • 3. Bax T, Sheppard BC, Crass RA. Surgical options in the management of groin hernias. Am Fam Physician 1999;59:893-906.
  • 4. Kulacoglu H. Mini-mesh repair for femoral hernia. Int J Surg Case Rep 2014;5:574–6.
  • 5. Pillay Y. Laparoscopic repair of an incarcerated femoral hernia. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;17:85–8.
  • 6. Murphy BL, Zhang J, Ubl DS, et al. Surgical trends of groin hernia repairs performed for recurrence in medicare patients. Hernia. 2019;23:677–83.
  • 7. McVay CB, Savage LE. Etiology of femoral hernia. Ann Surg 1961;154:25–32.
  • 8. Brook DC, Obeid A, Hawn M. Classification, clinical features and diagnosis of inguinal and femoral hernias in adults. Up To Date 2014.
  • 9. Conze J, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. Hernias. In: Holzheimer RG, Man-nick JA, editors. Surgical treatment: evidence-based and problem-oriented. Munich: Zuckschwerdt; 2001. Available from: http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6888/
  • 10. Lockhart K, Teo E, Teo S, et al. Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018;9:CD011517.
  • 11. Lee SL, DuBois JJ. Laparoscopic diagnosis and repair of pediatric femoral hernia Initial experience of four cases. Surg Endosc 2000;14:1110–3.
  • 12. Hachisuka T. Femoral hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1189–205.
  • 13. Tastaldi L, Krpata DM, Prabhu AS, et al. Emergent groin hernia repair: A single center 10-year experience. Surg 2019;165:398–405.
  • 14. LeBlanc KA. Complications associated with the plugand-patch method ofinguinal herniorrhaphy. Hernia 2001;5:135–8.
  • 15. Moorman ML, Price PD. Migrating mesh plug: complication of a well-establishedhernia repair technique. Am Surg 2004;70:298–9.
  • 16. Dai W, Chen Z, Zuo J, et al. Risk factors of postoperative complications after emergency repair of incarcerated groin hernia for adult patients: a retrospective cohort study. Hernia 2019;23:267–76.
  • 17. Andresen K, Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, et al. Reoperation rates for laparoscopic vs open repair of femoral hernias in Denmark: a nationwide analysis. JAMA Surgery 2014;149:853–7.
  • 18. Waltz P, Luciano J, Peitzman A, et al. Femoral hernias in patients undergoing total extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair: including routine evaluation of the femoral canal in approaches to inguinal hernia repair. JAMA Surg 2016;151:292–3.
  • 19. Swarnkar K, Hopper N, Nelson M, et al. Sutureless mesh-plug femoral hernioplasty. Am J Surg 2003;186:201–2.
  • 20. Alimoglu O, Kaya B, Okan I, et al. Femoral hernia: a review of 83 cases. Hernia 2006;10:70-3.
  • 21. Kang JS, Qiao F, Nie L, et al. Preperitoneal femoral hernioplasty: an "umbrella" technique. Hernia 2015;19:805-8.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: 12
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of medical faculty students about family medicine

Adem DOĞANER, Raziye Şule GÜMÜŞTAKIM, Celal KUŞ, Eyüp KALA

Investigation of the complete blood count parameters as an early diagnostic tool in contrast-induced nephropathy after contrast-enhanced computed tomography

Sedat BİLGE, Onur TEZEL

An investigation of the use of SCUBE1 protein as an early prognostic marker in predicting prognosis after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in cardiac arrest patients

Ahmet MENTEŞE, Ali AYGÜN, Gürkan ALTUNTAŞ, Faruk ÖZŞAHİN, Özgür TATLI, Süleyman TÜREDİ, Selim DEMİR, Ahmet Ali TOP, Şenol ARDIÇ, Betül ABANOZ

Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis with a novel mutation in CYP27A1 gene in a Turkish patient

İlker EYÜBOĞLU, Oğuz DİKBAŞ, Deniz TORUN, İrem İLGEZDİ, Burcu ÜNLÜ

Evaluation of the compatibility of phenotypic and molecular methods used to determine carbapenem resistance in enterobacterales isolates

Yücel DUMAN, İrem ŞIK

Reliability of testicular stiffness measurement by shear wave elastography to predict testicular atrophy in patients with chronic liver disease

Mevlüt TÜRE, Altay KANDEMİR, Mustafa GÖK, Tuna ŞAHİN, Ersen ERTEKİN

Management of penile zipper injury: A case report

Alper URAL, Dilan ALTINTAŞ URAL

Comparison of obese and non-obese patients in terms of sharp object injuries: A retrospective evaluation

Uğur TOPAL, Erdoğan Mütevelli SÖZÜER, Tutkun TALİH, Hızır Yakup AKYILDIZ

Comparative evaluation of the local application of dimethyl sulfoxide in an experimental spinal cord injury model

Necati ÜÇLER, Süleyman KILINÇ

Turkish validity and reliability study of public attitudes towards epilepsy (PATE) scale

Ümmühan AKTÜRK, Yahya AKALIN