Nurhayat ÖZKAN SEVENCAN, Fatime SAHİN, Ulku AYBUKE TUNC, Ayşegül ERTINMAZ ÖZKAN, Gulay YALİM

Comparison of group-based and individually training in patients with diabetes mellitus: 2-year follow-up study

Objective: This study examines whether any difference in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels exists among diabetic patients who hadgroup-based training in a diabetes school and patients who were individually trained in outpatient clinics.Methods: This study was conducted in Karabuk University Education and Research Hospital, Turkey, between March/2016 andMarch/2018. The HbA1c levels of 96 patients who were trained in a diabetes school and 99 patients who were individually trained inthe outpatient clinic were measured. The treatments of the patients trained in the outpatient clinic had also recently been changed,either by the addition of a new medication (oral anti-diabetic drugs or insulin) and/or by increasing the dosages of their currentmedications.Results: The mean HbA1c level was 9.29±1.90 for the diabetes school patients and 9.73±1.22 for the individually trained grouppatients (p>0.05). It was found that HbA1c regressed to 8.25±1.84 three months after the training in a school, while the regressionwas 8.34±1.66 in the outpatient trained group (p>0.05). No difference was detected between groups in terms of lowering HbA1C.Group-based training provided a more efficient HbA1c decrease in male patients, who had a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30, and inthose who received intensive insulin therapy. However, at the first year follow up, HbA1c showed a tendency to increase again in thediabetes school group.Conclusion: Group-based training is a cost-effective method that may also decrease anti-diabetic requirement and provides morepatient satisfaction, along with higher patient compliance. However, for long-term success, the training should be continuous andshould be held at least once a year to provide up-to-date information.

PDF

___

1. Tapp R, Zimmet P, Harper C, et al. Diagnostic thresholds for diabetes: the association of retinopathy and albuminuria with glycaemia. Diabet Res Clin Practic 2006;73:315-21.
2. Ginter E, Simko V. Type 2 diabetes mellitus, pandemic in 21st century. Diabetes: Springer; 2013. p. 42-50.
3. Sofi F, Casini A. Mediterranean diet and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: New therapeutic option around the corner? WJG 2014;20:7339.
4. Cansu GB, Taşkıran B, Yorulmaz G, et al. Is group diabetes education effective on hemoglobin A1c level? Eur Res J 4:193-8.
5. Harris S, Joyce H, Miller A, et al. The attitude of healthcare professionals plays an important role in the uptake of diabetes self-management education: analysis of the Barriers to Uptake of Type 1 Diabetes Education (BUD 1E) study survey. Diabet Med 2018.
6. Gabarron E, Bradway M, Fernandez-Luque L, et al. Social media for health promotion in diabetes: study protocol for a participatory public health intervention design. BMC 2018;18:414.
7. Educators AAoD. AADE 7 selfcare behaviors: American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE) position statement. Diabet Educ 2011;38:619-29.
8. Lawal M, Lawal F. Individual versus group diabetes education: Assessing the evidence. J Diabet Nurs 2016;20:247-50.
9. Davies MJ, Heller S, Skinner T, et al. Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008;336:491-5.
10. Duke S, Colagiuri S, Colagiuri R. Individual patient education for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. 2009.
11. Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, et al. Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. 2005.
12. Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, et al. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabet Care. 2002;25:1159-71.
13. Rickheim PL, Weaver TW, Flader JL, et al. Assessment of group versus individual diabetes education: a randomized study. Diabet Care. 2002;25:269-74.
14. Deakin T, Cade J, Williams R, et al. Structured patient education: the Diabetes X-PERT Programme makes a difference. Diabet Med. 2006;23:944-54.
15. Adolfsson ET, Walker-Engström ML, Smide B, et al. Patient education in type 2 diabetes—a randomized controlled 1-year follow-up study. Diabet Res Clin Practic 2007;76:341- 50.
16. Gucciardi E, DeMelo M, Lee RN, et al. Assessment of two culturally competent diabetes education methods: individual versus individual plus group education in Canadian Portuguese adults with type 2 diabetes. Ethnicity Healt 2007;12:163-87.