Analysis of outcome and risk factors for failure aftersingle-incision sling procedure

Analysis of outcome and risk factors for failure aftersingle-incision sling procedure

Aim: To assess the effectiveness and safety of a single-incision sling (SIS) and to detect the risk factors for failure after surgery inwoman with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).Materials and Methods: The medical records of the one hundred thirty-two patients were analyzed. Preoperatively, medical historywas taken and urogynecological examination was made. Patients were asked to answer Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7). Objective cure of SUI was defined as the absence of leakage of urine on the cough test. Subjective cure was based on negative response to UDI-6, question 3. Patients were divided into two groups according to objective cure rate: cured patients (Group A) and failed patients (Group B). Results: The overall objective and subjective cure was 87.8% and 90.1%, respectively. According to the objective cure rate, there were116 patients (87.8%) in Group A and 16 patients (12.2%) in Group B. In terms of subjective cure, Quality of Life (QoL) scores (IIQ-7 and stress subdomain of UDI-6) of Group B were statistically improved after surgery (p=0.001 and p=0.005 respectively). When two groups were compared, Group B had higher prevalence of severe SUI (IIQ scores ≥15 points) and reduced urethral mobility (Q-tip ≤ 30°) (0.8% vs 87.5%, p=0.0001 and 3.4% vs 68.7%, p=0.0001, respectively). The overall recommendation rate for surgery was 90%.Conclusion: Our study showed that SIS procedure has high subjective and objective cure rates. The main risk factors for failure weredetected as reduced urethral mobility and SUI severity expressed with IIQ scores

___

  • 1. Ulmsten U, Petros P. Intravaginal slingplasty (IVS): an ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of
  • female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol
  • 1995;29:75-82.
  • 2. Lin L, Huang MC, Su TH, et al. Comparison between
  • tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator tape
  • in treating stress urinary incontinence after vaginal
  • mesh surgery. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2018;57:528-
  • 31.
  • 3. Gambini-Ricapa J, García-Oms J, Barea M, et al.
  • Endopelvic free anchor minisling technique for
  • stress urinary incontinence treatment: 10 years of
  • experience. Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:1265-72.
  • 4. Molden SM, Lucente VR. New minimally invasive
  • slings: TVT Secur. Curr Urol Rep 2008;9:358-61.
  • 5. Mostafa A, Lim CP, Hopper L, et al. Single-incision
  • mini-slings versus standard midurethral slings
  • in surgical management of female stress urinary
  • incontinence: an updated systematic review and
  • meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications.
  • Eur Urol 2014;65:402-27.
  • 6. Lo TS, Chua S, Kao CC, et al. Five-Year Outcome of
  • MiniArc Single-Incision Sling Used in the Treatment
  • of Primary Urodynamic Stress Incontinence. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018;25:116-23.
  • 7. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/
  • International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on
  • the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction.
  • Neurourol Urodyn 2010;29:4-20.
  • 8. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, et al. The standardization
  • of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse
  • and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol
  • 1996;175:10-7.
  • 9. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation
  • of terminology of lower urinary tract function:
  • report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of
  • the International Continence Society. Am J Obstet
  • Gynecol 2002;187:116-26.
  • 10. Cam C, Sakalli M, Ay P, et al. Validation of the
  • prolapse quality of life questionnaire (P-QOL) in a
  • Turkish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
  • 2007;135:132-5.
  • 11. Cabrera J, Puyol M, Sousa A, et al. Minimal invasive
  • surgical technique without needles (Contasure
  • Needleless) for the surgical treatment of stress
  • urinary incontinence: a multicentric trail. Eur Urol
  • Suppl 2008;147:7-3.
  • 12. Palmieri S, Frigerio M, Spelzini F, et al. Risk factors for
  • stress urinary incontinence recurrence after single-
  • incision sling. Neurourol Urodyn 2018;37:1711-6.
  • 13. Martinez Franco E, Amat Tardiu L. Contasure-
  • Needleless® single incision sling compared with
  • transobturator TVT-O® for the treatment of stress
  • urinary incontinence: long-term results. Int Urogynecol
  • J 2015;26:213-8.
  • 14. Barber MD, Kleeman S, Karram MM, et al. Risk factors
  • associated with failure 1 year after retropubic or
  • transobturator midurethral slings. Am J Obstet
  • Gynecol 2008;199:666-7.
  • 15. Cammu H, Van Den Abbeele E, Nagel H, et al. Factors
  • predictive of outcome in tension-free vaginal tape
  • procedure for urinary stress incontinence in a teaching
  • hospital. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct
  • 2009;20:775-80.
  • 16. Stav K, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, et al. Risk factors of
  • treatment failure of midurethral sling procedures
  • for women with urinary stress incontinence. Int
  • Urogynecol J 2010;21:149-55.
  • 17. Karateke A, Haliloglu B, Cam C, et al. Comparison
  • of TVT and TVT-O in patients with stress urinary
  • incontinence: short-term cure rates and factors
  • influencing the outcome. A prospective randomised
  • study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;49:99-105.
  • 18. Mira Gon L, Zanettini Riccetto CL, Citatini de Campos
  • CC, et al. Mini-Sling Ophira at 8 Years Follow-Up: Does
  • It Sustain Results?. Urol Int 2019;102:326-30.
  • 19. Richter HE, Litman HJ, Lukacz ES, et al. Demographic
  • and clinical predictors of treatment failure one year
  • after midurethral sling surgery. Obstet Gynecol
  • 2011;117:913-21.
  • 20. Liapis A, Bakas P, Lazaris D, et al. Tension-free
  • vaginal tape in the management of recurrent stress
  • incontinence. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2004;269:205-7.
  • 21. Spelzini F, Cesana MC, Verri D, et al. Three-dimensional
  • ultrasound assessment and middle term efficacy of a
  • single-incision sling. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24:1391-
  • 7.
  • 22. Haliloglu B, Karateke A, Coksuer H, et al. The role
  • of urethral hypermobility and intrinsic sphincteric
  • deficiency on the outcome of transobturator tape
  • procedure: a prospective study with 2-year follow-up.
  • Int Urogynecol J 2010;21:173-8.
  • 23. Han SB, Kim JC, Lee DH, et al. The Effect of Valsalva
  • Leak Point Pressure on Outcomes of the Needleless
  • ®System in Female Stress Urinary Incontinence. Urol
  • J 2015;12:2251-5. Published 2015 Sep 4.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Aylık
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

A rare cause of incarcerated inguinal hernia content: Ruptured hemorrhagic ovarian cyst

Yusuf Tanrikulu, Ceren Sen Tanrikulu, Gokhan Yilmaz

Maxillofacial trauma incidence and patterns in patients admitted to the emergency department: A three-year retrospective study

Halit Baykan, Hakan Hakkoymaz, Alper Ural2, Mehmet Tatli

Effects of surgical atrial septal defect closure operation onthe frontal QRS-T angle

Dincer Uysal, Mevlut Serdar Kuyumcu

Comparison of the efficacy of nebulized budesonide and systemic steroids in children admitted to the emergency service with acute asthma attacks

Bilge Sahin Akkelle, Metin Aydogan, Rengin Siraneci

The effect of the laryngeal mask airway on the outcomesof the endoscopic tympanoplasty

Sinem Gokce Kutuk, Mustafa Kutuk, Yigit Ozcanoglu

Apoptotic effect of Belinostat (PXD101) on MCF-7 cancercells

Tugce Duran, Ercan Kurar, Zeliha Tuncer, Canan Eroglu Gunes

Strategies for ERCP complications: A new performer’sexperience and strategies for beginners to avoid complications

Nuri Emrah Goret, Mehmet Gokceimam

Are refugees applying to child and adolescent psychiatry departments only to obtain a disability report? The experience of a department in a Turkish city on the Syrian border

Mehmet Karadag, Baran Calisgan

Does intravitreal injection of aflibercept affect the corneal endothelium?

Hafize Gokben Ulutas, Gamze Ucan Gunduz

Characteristics of non-urgent visits in emergencydepartment

Orhan Meral, Onur Baykan, Tayfun Ozturk, Hayriye Gonullu