Lale KARABIYIK, Füsun BOZKIRLI, Gözde İNAN

Robotik Radikal Prostatektomilerde Total İntravenöz Anestezinin İntraoküler Basınça Etkileri

Amaç: Günümüzde prostat kanserinin cerrahi tedavisinde robotik cerrahinin yeri her geçen gün daha da artmaktadır. Robotik radikal prostatektomi işlemi avantajlarının yanı sıra intraoküler basıncı (İOB) arttırmak gibi olumsuz fizyolojik etkileri olabilecek aşırı Trendelenburg pozisyonu gerektirir. Bu çalışmada, robotik radikal prostatektomi uygulanan hastalarda total intravenöz anestezinin (TİVA) intraoküler basınç üzerine etkilerinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Çalışmaya, etik kurul onamı alındıktan sonra Gazi Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi'nde elektif robotik radikal prostatektomi planlanan 20 (ASA fiziksel skoru I-III) hasta dahil edildi. Standart anestezi indüksiyonu propofol (2- 3 mg/kg), remifentanil (1µg/kg), rokuronyum (0.6 mg/kg) ile gerçekleştirildi. Entübasyonu takiben idame propofol (6- 10 mg/kg/saat), remifentanil (0.1-0.5 µg/kg/dk) ile sağlandı. İntraoküler basınç ölçümleri her iki gözde daha önceden belirlenen 6 zaman diliminde (T1-6) Tono-pen XL el tonometresi ile gerçekleştirildi. Cerrahi süresi, kan basıncı, kalp hızı, tepe havayolu basıncı ve EtCO2 değerleri kaydedildi. Bulgular: 20 hastadan 10 tanesi ASA I, 9 tanesi ASA II, 1 tanesi ise ASA III idi. Hastaların yaş ortalaması 60,9 ± 6,9 (41- 72) bulundu. Cerrahi süre ortalama 218,6±69,2 dakika, Trendelenburg pozisyonunun süresi ise 125,8±50,3 (75-240) dakika idi. İOB anestezi indüksiyonunu (T2) takiben her iki gözde de başlangıç kontrol (T1) ölçümlerine göre anlamlı olarak düşük bulundu (p

Effects of Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Intraocular Pressure Changes During Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Background: Nowadays, the place of robotic surgery in the surgical treatment of prostate cancer is increasing day by day. Despite its advantages, the procedure requires specific positioning; steep Trendelenburg position with non-physiologic effects as increase in the intraocular pressure (IOP). In the present study, it was aimed to investigate the effects of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) IOP in patients undergoing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Materials and methods: Following approval by the institutional ethical comittee, 20 patients (ASA physical status IIII) scheduled for elective prostatectomy in Gazi University Medical Faculty Hospital were enrolled. Standard anesthesia was induced with intravenous propofol (2-3 mg/kg), remifentanil (1 µg/kg), rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg). Following intubation, anesthesia maintainance was provided with propofol (6-10 mg/kg/h) and remifentanil (0.1-0.5 µg/kg/min). The IOP was measured for both eyes at defined intervals during the procedure (T1-6) with Tono-pen XL® tonometer. Duration of surgery, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, peak airway pressure and ETCO2 were also recorded. Results: 10 of 20 patients were ASA I, 9 of them were ASA II and 1 of them was ASA III. Mean age of patients was 60,9 ± 6,9 (41-72) years. Mean duration of surgery was 218,6±69,2 min and Trendelenburg position was 125,8±50,3 min relatively. For both eyes a significant decrease was observed in IOP after anaesthesia induction (T2) compared with baseline measurements (T1) (p< 0.05). Mean IOP < 20 mmHg at all time points. Conclusion: During RARP, total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil can prevent the intraocular pressure increase associated with pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position and therefore might be appropriate to reduce postoperative ocular complications in these patients.

PDF

___

Leow JJ, Chang SL, Meyer CP, et al. Ro- bot-assisted Versus Open Radical Prosta- tectomy: A Contemporary Analysis of an All-payer Discharge Database. Eur Urol 2016;70:837-845.
Awad H, Santilli S, Ohr M, et al. The ef- fects of steep trendelenburg positioning on intraocular pressure during robotic ra- dical prostatectomy. Anesth Analg 2009;109:473-478.
Gainsburg DM. Anesthetic concerns for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical pros- tatectomy. Minerva Anestesiol 2012;78: 596-604.
Nickels TJ, Manlapaz MR, Farag E. Perio- perative visual loss after spine surgery. World J Orthop 2014:18;5:100-106.
Li A, Swinney C, Veeravagu A, et al. Pos- toperative Visual Loss Following Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Risk Factors by Diagnosis. World Neurosurg 2015;84: 2010-2021.
Borahay MA, Patel PR, Walsh TM, et al. Intraocular pressure and steep Trendelen- burg during minimally invasive gynecolo- gic surgery: is there a risk? J Minim Inva- sive Gynecol 2013;20:819-824.
Taketani Y, Mayama C, Suzuki N, et al. Transient but significant visual field de- fects after robot-assisted laparoscopic ra- dical prostatectomy in deep Trendelen- burg position. PLoS One 2015; 10:1-13.
Molloy BL. Implications for postoperative visual loss: steep trendelenburg position and effects on intraocular pressure. AANA J 2011;79:115-121.
Weber ED, Colyer MH, Lesser RL, et al. Posterior ischemic optic neuropathy after minimally invasive prostatectomy. J Neu- roophthalmol 2007;27:285-287.
Goepfert CE, Ifune C, Tempelhoff R. Ischemic optic neuropathy: are we any further? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2010;23: 582-587.
Mowafi HA, Al-Ghamdi A, Rushood A. Intraocular pressure changes during lapa- roscopy in patients anesthetized with pro- pofol total intravenous anesthesia versus isoflurane inhaled anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2003;97:471-474.
Schafer R, Klett J, Auffarth G, et al. Intra- ocular pressure more reduced during anesthesia with propofol than with sevof- lurane: both combined with remifentanil. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002;46:703-706.
Sator-Katzenschlager S, Deusch E, Do- lezal S, et al. Sevoflurane and propofol decrease intraocular pressure equally du- ring nonophthalmic surgery and recovery. Br J Anaesth 2002;89:764-766.
Montazeri K, Dehghan A, Akbari S. Inc- rease in intraocular pressure is less with propofol and remifentanil than isoflurane with remifentanil during cataract surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Adv Bio- med Res 2015;4:55.
Cheng YC, Li Y, Xu CT, et al. Effects of propofol versus urapidil on perioperative hemodynamics and intraocular pressure during anesthesia and extubation in opht- halmic patients. Int J Ophthalmol 2011;4:170-174.
Grosso A, Scozzari G, Bert F, et al. Intra- ocular pressure variation during colorectal laparoscopic surgery: standard pneumope- ritoneum leads to reversible elevation in intraocular pressure. Surg Endosc 2013;27:3370-3376.
Astuto M, Minardi C, Uva MG, Gullo A. Intraocular pressure during laparoscopic surgery in paediatric patients. Br J Opht- halmol 2011;95:294-295.
Hwang JW, Oh AY, Hwang DW, et al. Does intraocular pressure increase during laparoscopic surgeries? It depends on anesthetic drugs and the surgical position. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2013;23:229-232.
Borahay MA, Patel PR, Walsh TM, et al. Intraocular pressure and steep Trendelen- burg during minimally invasive gynecolo- gic surgery: is there a risk? J Minim Inva- sive Gynecol 2013;20:819-824.
Taketani Y, Mayama C, Suzuki N, et al. Transient but significant visual field de- fects after robot-assisted laparoscopic ra- dical prostatectomy in deep Trendelen- burg position. PLoS One 2015;10: e0123361.
Yoo YC, Shin S, Choi EK, et al. Increase in intraocular pressure is less with propo- fol than with sevoflurane during laparos- copic surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position. Can J Anaesth 2014;61:322-329.
Wong TT, Wong TY, Foster PJ, et al. The relationship of intraocular pressure with age, systolic blood pressure, and central corneal thickness in an Asian population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:4097- 4102.
Montazeri K, Dehghan A, Akbari S. Inc- rease in intraocular pressure is less with propofol and remifentanil than isoflurane with remifentanil during cataract surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Adv Bio- med Res. 2015;4:55.