Cerrahide Kohort Çalışmalarının Raporlanması İçin Bir Kılavuz; STROCSS Kriterlerinin Türkçe Uyarlaması

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, cerrahi alanında kohort çalışmalarının raporlama kalitesini iyileştirmek ve bir standart oluşturmak amacıyla uzmanlardan oluşanbir grup tarafından 2017 yılında yayınlanan 17 maddelik (37 alt madde) STROCSS (Cerrahide Kohort Çalışmaların Raporlanmasının Güçlendirilmesi)kriterlerinin Türkçeye uyarlanmasının yapılması amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: STROCSS kriterleri, üç yazar (E.D., C.A., M.A.T.) tarafından birbirlerinden ayrı olarak Türkçeye çevrilmiş ve Y.Y.’nin liderliğindeson taslak olarak belirlenmiştir. Türkçeye uyarlanmış kontrol listesi kullanılarak 2010-2018 yılları arasında TR dizinde yayınlanan 10 cerrahi kohortaraştırmasının raporlanma kalitesi beş farklı cerrahi branştaki akademisyen hekim (İ.Ş.T., G.D., Ü.M., G.D., M.E.) tarafından değerlendirilmiştir.İstatistiksel değerlendirmelerde sınıf içi korelasyon katsayısı ve Bland-Altman grafikleri kullanılmıştır.Bulgular: Cerrahi branşlardaki ikili değerlendirmeler arasında anlamlı uyum olduğu görülmüştür (p

A Guide to Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery; Turkish Adaptation of STROCSS Criteria

Objectives: In this study, it was aimed to adapt the 17-item (37 sub-items) STROCSS (Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery) criteria published in 2017 by a group of experts to improve the reporting quality of cohort studies in the surgical field and to establish a standard. Materials and Methods: STROCSS criteria were translated to Turkish by three authors (E.D., C.A., M.A.T.) separately, and a consensus was reached for the final version with Y.Y.’s guidance. The quality of reporting of 10 surgical cohort studies published in the TR index between 2010 and 2018, using a Turkish-adapted checklist, was evaluated by an academic physician (İ.Ş.T., G.D., Ü.M., G.D., M.E.) in five different surgical specialties. For the statistical evaluations, intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman graphs were used. Results: There was a significant correlation between pairwise evaluations in surgical specialties (p

PDF

___

1. Agha RA, Borrelli MR, Vella-Baldacchino M, et al. The STROCSS statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery. International Journal of Surgery. 2017;46:198-202.
2. Agha RA, Borrelli MR, Vella-Baldacchino M, et al. A protocol for the development of the STROCSS guideline: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery. International Journal of Surgery Protocols. 2017;5:15-17.
3. Agha RA, Fowler AJ, Saeta A, et al. SCARE Group. The SCARE Statement: Consensus-based surgical case report guidelines. Int J Surg. 2016;34:180- 186.
4. Agha RA, Fowler AJ, Rajmohan S, et al. PROCESS Group. Preferred reporting of case series in surgery; the PROCESS guidelines. Int J Surg. 2016;36:319- 323.
5. Gökmen D, Alkan A, Bakırarar B ve ark. Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, 2018.
6. Agha RA, Lee SY, Jeong KJL, et al. Reporting quality of observational studies in plastic surgery needs improvement: a systematic review. Annals of plastic surgery, 2016;76:585-589.
7. Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, et al. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines, PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000217.
8. Sinha IP, Smyth RL, Williamson PR. Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies, PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1000393.
9. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453-1457.
10. Boutron I, Altman DG, Moher D, et al. CONSORT statement for randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatments: a 2017 update and a CONSORT extension for nonpharmacologic trial abstracts, Ann Intern Med. 2017;167:40-47.
11. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. IntroductionGRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2011;64:383-394.
12. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c332.
13. Sunay D. Şengezer T, Oral M, ve ark. [The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel Group Randomized Trials], Euras J Fam Med. 2013;2:1-10.
14. Karaçam Z. [The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies], Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2014;17:1.
15. Beller EM, Glasziou PP, Altman DG, et al. PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001419.
16. Gülpınar Ö, Güçlü AG. [How to write a review article?] Turkish Journal of Urology. 39:44-48.
17. Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, et al. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:96- 106.
18. Erdoğan S, Temel GO. [Turkish adaptation of the guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) for clinical investigators], Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016;41:613-621.
19. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. Clin Chem. 2003;49:1-6.
20. Genç Y, Albayrak R, Ateş C, et al. [Evaluation of Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Turkish Adaptation of STARD Criteria]. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2012;65:137-146.