___

• Abell, P. and D. Reyniers. 2000. On the Failure of Social Theory. British Journal of Sociology 51 (4): 739–750.
• Alexander, J. C. (ed.) 1988. Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies. Cambridge: Cambrid- ge University Press.
• Archer, M. S. 2000. Being Human. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• ______ 1995. Realist Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Armitage, J. 2000. From Modernism to Hypermodernism and Beyond: An Interview with Paul Virilio. In Paul Virilio, edited by J. Armitage, 25–56. London: Sage.
• Barber, B. R. 1996. Jihad vs. McWorld. New York: Ballantine Books.
• Bataille, G. 1991 [1967]. The Accursed Share, Vol. I. New York: Zone Books.
• Baudrillard, J. 1990a. Cool Memories. London: Verso.
• _______ 1990b. Fatal Strategies. New York: Semiotext (e).
• _______ 1988. America. London: Verso.
• _______ 1983. In The Shadow of the Silent Majorities. New York: Semiotext (e).
• Beckford, J. A. 1989. Religion in Advanced Industrial Society. London: Unwin Hyman
• Berger, P.L. 1990 [1967]. The Sacred Canopy. New York: Doubleday.
• Billig, M. 1995. Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.
• Bogard, W. 2000. Sociology in the Absence of the Social: The Significance of Baudrillard for Contemporary Thought. In Jean Baudrillard, Vol. II, edited by M. Gane, 234–246. London: Sage.
• Calhoun, C. 1998. Community without Propinquity Revisited: Communication Technology and the Transformation of the Urban Public Sphere. Sociological Inquiry 68 (3): 373–97.
• Castells, M. 2000. Materials for An Exploratory Theory of the Network Society. British Journal of Sociology 51 (2): 5–24.
• ______ 1998. End of Millennium. Oxford: Blackwell.
• ______ 1997. The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
• ______ 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Deleuze, G. 1979. “Introduction,” in The Policing of Families, edited by J. Donzelot. London: Hutchinson.
• Derrida, J. 1991. A Derrida Reader. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.
• Durkheim, E. 1995 [1912]. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by Karen E. Fields. New York: Free Press.
• ______ 1974a [1906]. The Determination of Moral Facts. In Sociology and philosophy 35– 62. New York: Free Press.
• ______ 1974b [1898]. Individual and Collective Representations. In Sociology and philo- sophy, 1–34. New York: Free Press.
• ______ 1970 [1888]. Cours de Science Sociale. In La Science sociale et I’action, edited by C. Filloux, 23–48. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
• Featherstone, M. (ed.) 1992. Cultural Theory and Cultural Change. London: Sage.
• Fulcher, J. 2000. Globalisation, The Nation-State and Global Society. Sociological Review 48 (4): 522–543.
• Hardt, M. and A. Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Hayles, N.K. 1991. Chaos and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Hervieu-Leger, D. 2000. Religion as a Chain of Memory. Cambridge: Polity.
• Jenkins, T. 1999. Religion in English Everyday Life. Oxford: Bergahn Books.
• Jones, R. A. 1999. The Development of Durkheim’s Social Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lash, S. and M. Featherstone. 2001. Recognition and Difference: Politics, Identity, Multicul- ture, Theory, Culture and Society 18 (2–3): 1–19.
• Lemert, C. 1995. Sociology after the Crisis. Oxford: Westview Press.
• Lukes, S. 1973. Emile Durkheim: His Life and Work. London: Penguin.
• Lyotard, J-F. 1984. The Postmodern Condition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Lyon, D. 2000. Jesus in Disneyland. Cambridge: Polity.
• ______ 1988. The Information Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
• May, C. 2002. The Information Society. Cambridge: Polity.
• Mellor, PA. 2004. Religion, Realism and Social Theory. London: Sage.
• ______ 2002. In Defence of Durkheim: Sociology, the Sacred and ‘Society.’ Durkheimian Studies 8: 15–34.
• ______ 1998. Sacred Contagion and Social Vitality: Collective Effervescence. In Les Formes Elementaires de la Vie Religieuse. Durkheimian Studies 4: 87–114.
• Mellor, P.A. and C. Shilling. 1997. Re-forming the Body. London: Sage.
• Morrison, K. 2000. The Disavowal of The Social in the American Reception of Durkheim. Journal of Classical Sociology 1 (1): 95–125.
• Pickering, W.S.F. 1984. Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
• Rose, N. 1996. The Death of the Social? Refiguring the Territory of Government. Economy and Society 25: 327–56.
• Shilling, C. and P.A. Mellor. 2001. The sociological Ambition. London: Sage.
• Touraine, A. 1995. Critique of Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
• _______ 1989. Is Sociology still the Study of Society? Thesis Eleven, 23: 5–34.
• _______ 1969. La Societe Post-industrielle. Paris: Editions Denoel.
• Urry, J. 2003. Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity.
• _______ 2000. Sociology Beyond Societies. London: Routledge.
• Virilio, P. 2002. Ground Zero. London: Verso.
• _______ 2000. The Information Bomb. London: Verso.
• _______ 1984. L’Horizon Negatif. Paris: Galilee.
• Virilio, P. and S. Lotringer. 1997. Pure War. New York: Semiotext (e).
• Warner, R.S. 1993. Work in Progress Toward A New Paradigm for the Sociological Study of Religion in the United States. American Journal of Sociobgy 98 (5): 1044–1093.
• Weher, M. 1991 [1904–5]. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Harper Collins.
• Wehster, F. 1995. Theories of the Information Society. London: Routledge.
• Zizek, S. 2002. Welcome to the Desert of the Real. London: Verso.
• _______ 2000. The Fragile Absolute or, Why is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting for? London: Verso.
• _______ 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.