EFFECTS OF RECONSTRUCTION OF HEALTH CARE ON SERVICE DELIVERY PERFORMANCE IN TURKEY: THE PUBLIC HOSPITAL UNIONS

EFFECTS OF RECONSTRUCTION OF HEALTH CARE ON SERVICE DELIVERY PERFORMANCE IN TURKEY: THE PUBLIC HOSPITAL UNIONS

Objectives: In this study, the performance of 555 public hospitals was evaluated to research the impact of the Public Hospital Unions (PHU) practice applied in Turkey. Materials and Methods: Performance has two dimensions: efficiency and effectiveness. The scores obtained as a result of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Malmquist Index (MI) methods were taken as efficiency indicators. The degree of achievement of the targets was taken as effectiveness indicators, and the evaluation of effectiveness was performed by examining to what extent it has gotten closer to the targeted values on the Strategic Plans prepared by Turkey Public Hospitals Authority (TPHA). Results: According to the results of the DEA-VRS model, the percentage of efficient hospitals; was 69% in 2012, 74% in 2013, 70% in 2014, 70% in 2015, and 71% in 2016. According to the results of the DEA-CRS model, the percentage of efficient hospitals; was 55% in 2012, 60% in 2013, 56% in 2014, 55% in 2015, and 53% in 2016. The efficiency changes of all hospitals between the period of 2012-2016 were analyzed by the MI method, and the Technical Efficiency Change (TEC), Technological Change (TC), and Total Factor Productivity (TFP) values of the hospitals were found to decrease by 45%, 87%, and 72%, respectively. Conclusion: The public hospital unions (PHU) model, which was created to use resources effectively and efficiently in the field of health, did not significantly enhance hospitals' performance.

___

  • 1. Akdağ R. Türkiye Sağlıkta Dönüşüm Programı Değerlendirme Raporu (2003-2011). [Internet]. 2012; https://sbu.saglik.gov.tr/Ekutuphane/kitaplar/SDPturk.pdf. (Accessed: 28.02.2022).
  • 2. 663 Sayılı Sağlık Bakanlığı ve Bağlı Kuruluşlarınınn Teşkilat ve Görevleri Hakkında Kanun Hükmünde Kararname. [Internet]. 2011; https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2011/11/20111102M1-3.htm. (Accessed: 28.02.2022).
  • 3. Yildiz MS, Heboyan V, Khan MM. Estimating technical efficiency of Turkish hospitals: implications for hospital reform initiatives. BMC health services research. 2018;18(1):1-16.
  • 4. Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2020 Haber Bülteni. [Internet]. 2021; https://sbsgm.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/41611/0/haber-bulteni-2020pdf.pdf. (Accessed: 28.02.2022).
  • 5. Bağcı H, Atasever M. Türkiye Sağlik Sistemi. Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi AŞ; 2020.
  • 6. Evans DB, Tandon A, Murray CJ, Lauer JA. The comparative efficiency of national health systems in producing health: an analysis of 191 countries. World Health Organization. 2000;29(29):1-36.
  • 7. Sahin I, Ozcan YA, Ozgen H. Assessment of hospital efficiency under health transformation program in Turkey. Central European Journal of Operations Research. 2011;19(1):19-37.
  • 8. Kacak H, Ozcan YA, Kavuncubasi S. A new examination of hospital performance after healthcare reform in Turkey: sensitivity and quality comparisons. International Journal of Public Policy. 2014;10(4-5):178-94.
  • 9. Yiğit V. Hastanelerde teknik verimlilik analizi: Kamu hastane birliklerinde bir uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2016;7(2):9-16.
  • 10. Yildirim S, Kacak H, Yildirim C. Reorganization Health Care Delivery and Productivity Change: An Assessment of Turkish Public Hospital Performance with Malmquist Index. Journal of Applied Business & Economics. 2018;20(3).
  • 11. Küçük A, Özsoy VS, Balkan D. Assessment of technical efficiency of public hospitals in Turkey. European Journal of Public Health. 2020;30(2):230-5.
  • 12. Sherman HD, Zhu J. Service productivity management: Improving service performance using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Springer science & business media; 2006.
  • 13. Gok MS, Sezen B. Analyzing the efficiencies of hospitals: An application of Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Global Strategic Management. 2011;10(1):137-46.
  • 14. Teleş M, Çakmak C, Konca M. Avrupa Birliği döngüsündeki ülkelerin sağlık sistemleri performanslarının karşılaştırılması. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018;25(3):811-35.
  • 15. İlgün G, Konca M. Assessment of efficiency levels of training and research hospitals in Turkey and the factors affecting their efficiencies. Health Policy and Technology. 2019;8(4):343-8.
  • 16. KESKİN Hİ. Türkiye'de sağlıkta dönüşüm programı ve kamu hastanelerinin etkinliği. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi. 2018;18(38):124-50.
  • 17. Bağci H, Konca M. Evaluating the Technical Efficiency of Hospitals Providing Tertiary Health Care in Turkey: An Application Based on Data Envelopment Analysis. Hospital Topics. 2021;99(2):49-63.
  • 18. Chowdhury H WW, Laporte A. A. Efficiency and technological change in health care services in Ontario: An application of Malmquist productivity index with bootstrapping. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2011;60(7):721-745.
  • 19. LaPlante AE, Paradi J. Evaluation of bank branch growth potential using data envelopment analysis. Omega. 2015;52:33-41. 20. Charnes A CW, Rhodes E. . Measuring the efficiency of decision making. European Journal of Operational Research. 1978;2(6):429–44.
  • 21. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science. 1984;30(9):1078-92.
  • 22. Ozcan YA. Health care benchmarking and performance evaluation. An Assessment using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Springer; 2014.
  • 23. Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE. The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. 1982:1393-414.
  • 24. Färe R, Grosskopf S. Malmquist productivity indexes and Fisher ideal indexes. The Economic Journal. 1992;102(410):158-60.
  • 25. Sağlık Bakanlığı Kamu Hastaneleri Kurumu 2014-2018 Dönemi Stratejik Planı. [Internet]. 2014; http://www.sp.gov.tr/upload/xSPStratejikPlan/files/1zPvc+TKHK.pdf. (Accessed: 28.02.2022).
  • 26. Sağlık Bakanlığı Türkiye Kamu Hastaneleri Kurumu İdare Faaliyet Raporu. [Internet]. 2016; http://www.sp.gov.tr/upload/xSPRapor/files/j14JE+2015.pdf. (Accessed: 28.02.2022).
  • 27. Küçük A. Public hospital reform in T urkey: The "public hospital union" case (2012‐2017). The International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 2018;33(4):e971-e84.
  • 28. Aydın S. Reisü’l-Etibba’dan Başkanlık Hükümeti Sağlık Bakanlığı’na. SD Sağlık Düşüncesi ve Tıp Kültürü Dergisi. 2018;47:6-9.
  • 29. 694 Sayılı Olağanüstü Hal Kapsamında Bazı Düzenlemeler Yapılması Hakkında Kanun Hükmünde Kararname. [Internet]. 2017; https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2017/08/20170825-13.pdf. (Accessed: 28.02.2022).
  • 30. Türkiye Kamu Hastaneleri Kurumu 2017 Yılı Sayıştay Denetim Raporu [Internet]. 2017; https://sayistay.gov.tr/reports/download/356-turkiye-kamu-hastaneleri-kurumu (Accessed: 28.02.2022).
Ankara Medical Journal-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

THE EFFECT OF BARIATRIC SURGERY ON CALCIUM METABOLISM

Müge KESKİN, Doğan ÖZTÜRK, Leyla İpek RUDVAN AL, Hakan BULUŞ, Arzu OR KOCA

EFFECTS OF RECONSTRUCTION OF HEALTH CARE ON SERVICE DELIVERY PERFORMANCE IN TURKEY: THE PUBLIC HOSPITAL UNIONS

Hasan BAĞCI, Seyhan ÇİL KOÇYİĞİT

EFFECTS OF ACTIVE/PASSIVE SMOKING EXPOSURE IN PATIENTS WITH COPD

Nurgül BOZKURTT, Ali İhsan BOZKURT

EVALUATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HIGHDENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL LEVELS AND COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA SEVERITY IN ADULT PATIENTS

Aysegul KARALEZLİ, Emine ARGÜDER, Hatice Canan HASANOĞLU, Berker ÖZTÜRK, Habibe HEZER, Ebru Şengül PARLAK, Afra ALKAN

AN EXAMINATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIGITAL APPLICATIONS FOR OBESE PATIENTS WHOSE FOLLOWUP AND TREATMENT WERE DISRUPTED DUE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Hatice ESEN, Remziye Nur EKE, Yalçın ALBAYRAK, Seçil KURU

ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING HABITS OF HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC PERIOD

İsmail ARSLAN, İzzet FİDANCI, Muhammet SİNAN, Duygu YENIGIL TACI, Mustafa ÇELİK

ASSESSMENT OF PREGNANCY FOLLOW-UPS FOR CASES REGISTERED IN A FAMILY HEALTH CENTER

Halil Alper ASLAN, Gülin FEYKAN YEĞİN, Raziye DESTİCİOĞLU

EVALUATION OF THE GENERAL DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF COLON CANCER PATIENTS: IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE PATIENTS?

Ümmügül ÜYETÜRK, Fatma KAPLAN EFE, Rıdvan ERTEN, Büşragül YILMAZ, Mehmet POYRAZER, Atacan ARAS

PARA-INFECTIOUS GUILLAIN BARRE SYNDROME IN A PATIENT DIAGNOSED WITH COVID-19

Cansu BÜYÜKTARAKÇI, Hesna BEKTAŞ, Hürrem BODUR, Aliye BAŞTUĞ

HOW DOES A WOMAN'S REPRODUCTIVE AND BREASTFEEDING HISTORY, WEIGHT, HEIGHT, BODY MASS INDEX, BREAST SIZE AND BREAST DENSITY AFFECT THE RADIATION DOSE SHE TAKES DURING MAMMOGRAPHY?

Karabekir ERCAN, Leman GÜNBEY KARABEKMEZ