Emel DEMİR, Erhan YENGİL

ÇOCUK İŞÇİLİĞİ EĞİTİM MODÜLÜNÜN SİVİL TOPLUM ÖRGÜTLERİNİN ÇOCUK HAKLARI TUTUMUNA ETKİSİNİN BELİRLENMESİ

Amaç: Çocuk işçiliği çocuk hakları boyutuyla disiplinler arası çalışılması gereken bir konudur. Sivil toplum örgütlerinin Çocuk hakları konusunda eğitimi, çocuk işçiliğindeki çocukların hak kaybı ya da hakların korunması yönünde sivil toplum liderlerine önemli sorumluluk vermektedir. Araştırma sivil toplum örgütü liderlerinin çocuk hakları konusunda bilgi düzeyinin eğitim ile değişimini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Materyal ve Metot: Araştırmanın tipi deneyseldir. Araştırma 2018 yılı Mart- Haziran ayları arasında 4 ayda, pilot olarak seçilen 4 ilde (Adana, Mersin, Ordu, Manisa) yapılmış, araştırmaya 123 kişi katılmıştır. Bu araştırma, Türkiye Esnaf Sanatkarlar Konfederasyonu (TESK) ve Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi işbirliği ile UNICEF projesi kapsamında desteklenmiştir. Araştırma için liderlere, çocuk hakları ve çocuk işçiliği konusunda 4 saatlik bir eğitim verilmiştir. Bu eğitim öncesi ve sonrasında liderlere çocuk işçiliği anket formu ve çocuk hakları tutum Ölçeği uygulanmıştır. Araştırma izni MKÜ Etik kurulundan alınmıştır. Veriler SPSS 22 de analiz edilmiş, dağılım yönünden Kolmogorov-Smirnow testi ile incelenmiş sonrasında ise gruplar arası MannWhitney U testi / Kruskal Wallis testi kullanılmıştır. Eğitim öncesi ve sonrası için ise Wilcoxon testi ile değerlendirilmiş olup, p>0.05 anlamlı kabul edilmiştir. Bulgular: Araştırma sonuçlarına göre sivil toplum liderlerinin çocuk hakları ölçeği puan ortalaması eğitim öncesi ön-test 97.52±10.95, eğitim sonrası son-test 99.02±10.71 olarak bulunmuştur. Çocuk haklarına yönelik eğitim öncesi ve sonrası değerler istatiksel olarak anlamlıdır (p=0.01). Eğitimin, liderlerin cinsiyeti (E/K), iş pozisyonu (Başkan/Çalışan), iş yılı tecrübesi (0-11 yıl), yaş değişkenlerine göre etkisi istatiksel olarak anlamlı değildir (p>0.05). Fakat eğitim, liderlerin eğitim durumu ve çalışmanın yapıldığı illere göre istatiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur (p

DEFINING THE EFFECT OF CHILD LABOUR TRAINING MODULE ON NGO’S ATTITUDES TOWARDS CHILD RIGHTS

Objectives: Child labour is an interdisciplinary issue including the child rights dimension. Child rights trainingfor non-governmental organizations in the means of forfeiture and keeping the rights of children gives crucialresponsibility to NGO leaders. The research is done to assess the change of child rights knowledge level of NGOleaders via training.Materials and Methods: The research is experimental and it is accomplished in 4 pilot cities (Adana, Mersin,Ordu, Manisa) in four months between March and June 2018 and 123 persons took part in it. The study issupported by a UNICEF project cooperation with The Confederation of Turkish Tradesmen and Craftsmen(CTTC) and Hatay Mustafa Kemal University (HMKU). In the frame of the research, the leaders are given a fourhours of training on child rights and child labour. Child labour survey form and child rights attitude scale isapplied to the leaders before and after the training. The permission for the research is got from HMKU EthicsCommittee. Gathered data is analyzed by SPSS 22, examined by Kolmogorov-Smirnow test in the means ofdistribution and then inter-groups Mann-Whitney U test / Kruskal Wallis test is used. Wilcoxon test is usedbefore and after the training and p>0.05 is accepted as meaningful.Results: As a result of the research findings, child rights scale points average of NGO leaders are 97.52±10.95before training for preliminary test; and 99.02±10.71 after training for posttest. Acquired values gatheredbefore and after child rights training are statistically meaningful (p=0.01). The effect of training compared tothe gender of leaders (M/F), working position (President/Worker), working experience (0-11 years), agevariables is not statistically meaningful (p>0.05). On the other hand, education level of leaders is statisticallymeaningful depending on the cities that the research accomplished.Conclusion: Child rights knowledge level could be increased via the training of NGO leaders. The trainingsshould be increased considering the regional results depending on the pilot studies.

PDF

___

1. Waterston T, Davies R. The Convention on the Rights of the Child. Lancet. 2006;367(9511):635.
2. Waterston T, Yilmaz G. Child Rights and Health Care: International Society for Social Pediatrics and Child Health (ISSOP) Position Statement. Child: care, health and development. 2014;40(1):1-3.
3. Tisdall E K M. Children’s Rights and Children’s Wellbeing: Equivalent Policy Concepts? Jnl Soc Pol. 2015;44:807-23.
4. Raman S, Woolfenden S, Williams K, Zwi K. Human rights and child health. Journal of paediatrics and child health. 2007;43(9):581-6.
5. UN. On World Day Against Child Labour, UN urges protection for children in conflicts and disasters. https://news.un.org/en/story/2017/06/559252-world-day-against-child-labour-un-urges- protection-children-conflicts-and2017 [updated https://news.un.org/en/story/2017/06/559252- world-day-against-child-labour-un-urges-protection-children-conflicts-and24/07/2019].
6. UN. Fight against child labour moving in right direction, but not quickly enough – UN report. https://news.un.org/en/story/2013/09/4498122017 [24/07/2019].
7. Foroughi M, Moayedi-Nia S, Shoghli A, Bayanolhagh S, Sedaghat A, Mohajeri M, et al. Prevalence of HIV, HBV and HCV among street and labour children in Tehran, Iran. Sex Transm Infect. 2017;93(6):421-3.
8. Iacobucci G. Labour promises healthier food for children and standardised tobacco packaging. Bmj. 2015;350:h268.
9. Zainab S, Kadir M. Nutritional status and physical abuse among the children involved in domestic labour in Karachi Pakistan: a cross-sectional survey. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2016;66(10):1243-8.
10.Karimi-Sari H, Rezaee-Zavareh MS, Alavian SM. Street and labour children; special group for elimination of viral hepatitis in Iran. Sex Transm Infect. 2017;93(1):38-.
11.Houben E, Smits E, Pimenta JM, Black LK, Bezemer ID, Penning-van Beest FJ. Increased risk of morbidities and health-care utilisation in children born following preterm labour compared with fullterm labour: A population-based study. Journal of paediatrics and child health. 2019;55(4):446-53.
12.Zwi K, Chaney G. Refugee children: rights and wrongs. Journal of paediatrics and child health. 2013;49(2):87-93.
13.Karaman Kepenekçi Y. A study of university studets’ attitudes towards children’s rights in Turkey. . The International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2006;14:307-19.
14.Khatab K, Raheem MA, Sartorius B, Ismail M. Prevalence and risk factors for child labour and violence against children in Egypt using Bayesian geospatial modelling with multiple imputation. Plos One. 2019;14(5).
15.Adonteng-Kissi O. Parental perceptions of child labour and human rights: A comparative study of rural and urban Ghana. Child Abuse Neglect. 2018;84:34-44.
16.Qi D, Wu YC. The extent and risk factors of child poverty in urban China - What can be done for realising the Chinese government goal of eradicating poverty before 2020. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2016;63:74-82.
17.Dunhill A. Does teaching children about human rights, encourage them to practice, protect and promote the rights of others? Educ 3-13. 2018;46(1):16-26.
18.Hakim A, A. R. Health and Nutritional Condition of Street Children of Dhaka City: An Empirical Study in Bangladesh. Science Journal of Public Health. 2016;4(1):6-9.
19.Beazley H. Multiple identities, multiple realities: children who migrate independently for work in Southeast Asia. Child Geogr. 2015;13(3):296-309.
20.Wickham S, Anwar E, Barr B, Law C, Taylor-Robinson D. Poverty and child health in the UK: using evidence for action. Arch Dis Child. 2016;101(8):759-66.