___

• Bechtold, Stefan, ‘The Fashion of TV Show Formats’, Michigan State Law Review, 2013, 451, pp.451-512
• Chalaby, Jean K, ‘The Making of an Entertainment Revolution: How the TV Format trade Became a Global Industry’, European Journal of Communication, 2012, 26(4), pp. 293–309
• Day, Louis A., ‘A Copyright Dilemma: TV Format’, J. Broad, 1978, 22(2), pp.249-257
• Eickmeier, Frank, and Von Have, Harro, ‘Statutory Protection for Television Show Formats’, Entertainment Law Review, 1998, 9(1), pp.9-15.
• Fields, Desire, ‘Come and Have a Go ... If You Think You Are Smart Enough: High Court Grants Defendants Summary Judgment in TV Format Case’, Entertainment Law Review, 2011, 22(2), pp.61-64
• FRAPA, ‘FRAPA 2011 Report’
• http://www.frapa.org/wp-content/uploads/Report/FINAL%20 FRAPA_Report_2011.pdf, (accessed on 28.03.2014)
• Gotlieb, Neta-Li E., ‘Free to Air?’, IDEA, 2011, 51(211), pp.211-270
• Klement, Ute, ‘Protecting Television Show Formats under Copyright Law – New Developments in Common Law and Civil Law Countries’, European Intellectual Property Review, 2007, 29(2), pp.52-60.
• Kretschemer, Martin, and Shing, Sukhpreet, “The Explotations of TV Formats: an Emprical Study, Intellectual Property and Non-Law Based Strategies”, http://www.hiig.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Exploitation-of- TV-Formats-Empirical-Study.pdf (accessed on 25.03.2014)
• Moran, Albert, and Malbon, Justin, Understanding the Global TV Format, (Intellect Books, 2006)
• Rubin, Jay, ‘Television Formats: Caught in the Abyss of the Idea/ Expression Dichotomy’, Fordham Intellectual Property and Media Law Journal, 16, pp. 661-736.
• Sookman Barry, ‘Robinson v Cinar in the Supreme Court’, Barry Sookman, http://www.barrysookman.com/2013/12/24/robinson-v-cinar-in- the-supreme-court/, (accessed on 28.03.2014)
• Steffenson, Torben ‘Rights to TV Formats – from a Copyright and Marketing Law Perspective’, Entertainment Law Review, 2000, 11(5), pp.85- 89.
• Swendells, Rebecca, and Sweeney, Michael ‘The DifŞ culty with TV Formats and Copyright Protection’, Entertainment Law Review, 2012, 23(6), pp.155-156
• Nine Films & Television Pty Ltd v Ninox Television Limited [2005] FCA 1404
• TV Globo Ltda. & Endemol Entertainment International B.V. v TVSBT & Canal 4 de Sao Paulo S.A., Civil Appeal No. 994.04.082658-4 – Osasco, http://www.ifl a.tv/big%20brother%20brazil%20judgment.pdf (accessed on 27.03.2014).
• Preston v. 20th Century Fox Canada Ltd. (1990), 33 C.P.R. (3d) 242 (Fed.T.D.), aff’d (1994), 53 C.P.R. (3d) 407 (Fed. C.A.)
• Arbique v. Gabriele, [1998] J.Q. no 3794 (QL) (Sup. Ct.), aff’d 2003 CanLII 16298 (Que. C.A.)
• Cumming v Global Television Network Quebec Ltd & Canwest Global Broadcasting Inc & Global Television Network Inc, [2005] 17671 (QC CS)
• Cast Away Television Productions Ltd v Endemol Entertainment International BV, ECLI: NL: HR 2004: AO3162 http://uitspraken. rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:PHR:2004:AO3162, (accessed on 24.03.2014).
• Green v Broadcasting Corp of New Zealand [1989] R.P.C. 469 (N.Z.C.A.)
• Endemol Entertainment v Antena 3 [1994], FRAPA Report 2011, p.16, http://www.frapa.org/wp-content/uploads/Report/FINAL%20FRAPA_ Report_2011.pdf, (accessed on 28.03.2014)
• Spain: Maradentro Producciones S.L. v Sogecable, S.A. [2009], FRAPA Report 2011, p.26, http://www.frapa.org/wp-content/uploads/Report/ FINAL%20FRAPA_Report_2011.pdf, (accessed on 28.03.2014)
• Atomis Media, S.A & Outright Distribción Ltd v Televisión De Galicia, S.A. & CTV, S.A. [2010], FRAPA Report 2011, p.28
• http://www.frapa.org/wp-content/uploads/Report/FINAL%20FRAPA_ Report_2011.pdf, (accessed on 28.03.2014)
• Celador Productions Limited v Melville - Boone v ITV Network and Others – Baccini v Celador Productions Limited and Others [2004] EWHC 2362 (CH)
• Meakin v BBC [2010] EWHC 2065 (Ch)