Zeynep ERHAN

4445

TÜRK CEZA KANUNU VE ROMA STATÜSÜNDE DÜZENLENEN ULUSLARARASI SUÇLARA YÖNELİK ULUSLARARASI YARGI ORGANLARININ KARARLARI IŞIĞINDA KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ANALİZ

Türkiye, Avrupa Birliğine katılma sürecinin bir sonucu olarak, iç hukukunda bazı reformlar yapmıştır. Avrupa Birliğine uyum süreci ile birlikte, soykırım suçu ve insanlığa karşı suçlar, 2004 yılı itibariyle Türk Ceza Kanunu kapsamına alınmıştır. Bu çalışma, Türk Ceza Kanunu ile Roma Statüsü’nde düzenlenen uluslararası suçlar arasındaki farkları, Avrupa birliğine ve mahkemeye taraf olma sürecinin Türkiye üzerindeki etkilerini temel alarak analiz etmektedir. Farlılıklara yönelik yapılan karşılaştırmalı analizde, Uluslararası yargı organlarının bu suçları yorumlama biçimi detaylı bir biçimde gözden geçirilmektedir. Bu süreçte yapılan iç hukuk düzenlemelerine ve Roma Statüsünün oluşum sürecindeki tartışmalara, Türkiye’nin çıkarları olgusunun ne yönde etki ettiği tartışılmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, Türkiye’nin neden Roma Statüsünde yer alan tüm suçlara yer vermediği ve yer verdiği suçları neden farklı şekilde düzenlediği analiz edilmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Türk Ceza Kanunu, Roma Statüsü, karşılaştırmalı analiz, devlet çıkarları, Avrupa Birliğine uyum süreci

CORE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES IN TURKISH CRIMINAL LAW AND THE ROME STATUTE

By virtue of the Europeanisation process, Turkey has carried out some legal reforms to its domestic law with the aim of fulfi lling the requirements to join the European Union (EU). The Turkish Penal Code (TPC) includes the crime of genocide, as well as crimes against humanity, since 2004. Nonetheless, Turkey has not incorporated all the crimes listed in the Rome Statute into domestic law. Thus, this paper will be looking at the inconsistencies between the TPC and the Rome Statute from a state interest point of view by scrutinising the constitutive eff ect of the EU and the International Criminal Court (ICC) on Turkey. Within the scope of this focus, it will be shown how the constitutive eff ects of the ICC and the EU have infl uenced Turkey. The second focus will be to shed light on the question of how Turkey’s selfinterest was refl ected in forming the new TPC and during the negotiation process for the Rome Statute. Although the TPC was adopted after the Rome Statute, the question remains as to why Turkey did not embrace all international crimes as defi ned in the Rome Statute. 
Keywords:

Turkish penal code, Rome Statute, comparative analysis, state interest, Europeanisation process,

PDF

___

  • BAUN, Michael J: A wider Europe: The process and politics of European Union enlargement, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, Boulder, New York and Oxford, 2000.
  • BAYILLIOĞLU, Uğur: “Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi ve Türkiye”, (“Turkey and the International Criminal Court”). Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 56, No. 1, 2007.
  • BIÇAK, Vahit / GRIEVES, Edward: Turkish Penal Code, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2007.
  • BIÇAK, Vahit: Suç Muhakemesi Hukuku (Penal Procedure Law), Polis Akademisi Yayınları, Ankara, 2013.
  • BOZBAYINDIR, Ali Emrah: Turkey and the International Criminal Court, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Köln, 2013.
  • FLÜCKIGER, Alexandre: “The ambiguous principle of the clarity of law”. In WAGNER, Anne / CACCIAGUIDI-FAHY, Sophie: Obscurity and Clarity in the Law, Ashgate, Aldershot, 2008, pp.100-133.
  • HANSEN, Thomas Obel: “The policy requirement in crimes against humanity: lessons from and for the case of Kenya”, The George Washington International Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 1–42, 2011.
  • HUGHES, Edel: Turkey’s Accession to the European Union: The Politics of Exclusion?, Routledge, London & New York, 2010.
  • KARADAŞ, Cemalettin: “Türkiye’in Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi’ne Yaklaşımı: Mahkemeyi Kuran Roma Statüsü’ne Taraf Olacak mı?”, (Turkey’s Attitude towards the International Criminal Court), Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, Vol.5, No.20, 2009, pp.33–57.
  • KARAKEHYA, Hakan: “Uluslararasi Ceza Mahkemesi Ve Uygulanabilir Hukuk”, (“International Criminal Court and Applicable Law”), Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, pp. 133–164.
  • KATTAN, Victor: Review of The Crime of Aggression Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court by Carrie McDougall, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2015.
  • KOCA, Mahmut: “The Crime of Genocide in the New Turkish Penal Code”, In Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, Vol. 42, No. 59, 2010.
  • KOSTIC, Drew: “Whose Crime is it Anyway – The International Criminal Court and the Crime of Aggression”, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp.109-142, 2011.
  • KREß, Claus / VON HOLTZENDORFF, Leonie: “The Kampala compromise on the crime of aggression”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 8, No. 5, 2010.
  • MALLIARIS, Stylianos: “Assessing the ICTY Jurisprudence in Defining the Elements of the Crime of Genocide: The Need for Plan”, Review of International Law Politics, Vol. 5, No: 20, pp. 105–128, 2009.
  • MALLIARIS, Stylianos: “Assessing the ICTY Jurisprudence in Defining the Elements of the Crime of Genocide: the Need for a ‘Plan’”, USAK Yearbook of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 3, pp. 145–170, 2010.
  • MAVİŞ, Volkan: “Crimes Against Humanity in the Turkish Criminal Code: A Critical Review in the Light of International Mechanisms”, Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. XX, No. 2, 2016.
  • ÖNOK, Murat: Uluslararasi Ceza Di̇vani’ni Kuran Roma Statüsü ile Türk Ulusal Mevzuatinin Maddi̇ Ceza Hukuku Kurallari Yönünden Uyumuna Dai̇r Rapor, 2011. (Report concerning the Inconsistencies between the Turkish Penal Code and the Rome Statute; available only in Turkish, translated by the author). (http://www.ucmk.org.tr/dosya/Yayin/UCM_rapor-web.pdf ) Date accessed: 16.12.2015)
  • SADAT, Leila Nadya: “Crimes against humanity in the modern age”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 107, No. 2, pp. 334–377, 2013.
  • SCHARF, Michael. P: “Universal Jurisdiction and the Crime of Aggression”, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp.357–388, 2012.
  • SCHABAS, William. A: “Developments in the law of genocide”, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, Vol.5, pp. 131–165, 2002.
  • SCHABAS, William A: “Whither genocide? The International Court of Justice finally pronounces”, Journal of Genocide Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 183–192, 2007.
  • SCHABAS, William A: An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. 3rd edition. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • SCHABAS, William A: “State policy as an element of international crimes”, The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 98, No. 3, pp. 953–982, 2008.
  • SCHABAS, William A: The International Criminal Court: a commentary on the Rome statute, Oxford University Press, 2010.
  • SEYMEN ÇAKAR, Ayşen: “İnsanlığa Karşı Suçlar” (Crimes Against Humanity), Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, Vol.103, 2012.
  • STANTON, Gregory H: “What is Genocide?”, Genocide Watch, 2002.
  • TRAHAN, Jennifer: “The Rome Statute's Amendment on the Crime of Aggression: Negotiations at the Kampala Review Conference”, International Criminal Law Review, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2011.
  • ULUSOY, Orçun / KILINÇ, Utku: Uluslararası ceza mahkemesi (International Criminal Court), İnsan Hakları Gündemi Derneği, 2008.
  • URHAN, Betül / ÇELIK, Seydi: “Perceptions of ‘National Security’ in Turkey and Their Impacts on the Labor Movement and Trade Union Activities”, European Journal of Turkish Studies. Social Sciences on Contemporary Turkey, Vol. 11, 2010.
  • UZUN, Elif: “Milletlerarası Ceza Mahkemesi Düşüncesinin Tarihsel Gelişimi ve Roma Statüsü”, (“The Development of International Justice and the Rome Statute”), 2003.
  • VON HEBEL, Herman / ROBINSON, Darryl: “Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the Court”. In Lee, R.S. (Ed.) The International Criminal Court. The Making of the Rome Statute, pp.78–126, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 1999.
  • WERLE, Gerhard / BORIS, Burghardt: “Do Crimes Against Humanity Require the Participation of a State or a ‘State-like’ Organization?”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol.10, No. 5, 2012.
  • WENAWESER, Christian: “Reaching the Kampala Compromise on Aggression: The Chair's Perspective”, Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2010.
  • CASES and REPORTS
  • Akayesu, (Trial Chamber), 2 September 1998.
  • Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), 2007 I.C.J. 70.
  • Bashir (ICC-02/05-01/09), Decision on the Prosecution’s Application for a Warrant of Arrest against Omar Hasan Al Bashir, 4 March 2009.
  • Bemba (ICC-01/05-01/08), Decision Pursuant to Articles 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome Statute on the Charges of the Prosecutor Against Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, 15 June 2009.
  • Decision Pursuant to Article 15 of the Rome Statute on the Authorization of an Investigation into the Situation in the Republic of Kenya, ICC-01/09-19, 31 March 2010, Pre-Trial Chamber II Decision.
  • European Commission Enlargement, EU-Turkey Relations. (http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/candidate-countries/turkey/eu_turkey_relations_en.htm ) Date accessed:14.6.2016)
  • European Commission, Turkey 2005 Progress Report, SEC (2005) 1426, Brussels 9 November 2005, p.130.
  • General Assembly Resolution, 3314 (XXIX), 14 December 1974, 29 U.N. GAOR, 29th Sess., Supp. No. 31, UN Doc. A/9631.
  • ICTY, Prosecutor v. Tadic, Case No. IT-94-1-T, Judgment, 7 May 1997.
  • ICTY, Prosecutor v. Kordic and Cerkez, Case No. IT-95-14/2-A, Appeal Judgment, 17 December 2004.
  • ICTY, Prosecutor v. Blaskic, Case No. IT-95-14-A, Appeal Judgment, 29 July 2004.
  • ICTY, Prosecutor v. Kordic and Cerkez, Case No. IT-95-14/2-A, Appeal Judgement, 17 December 2004.
  • ICTY, Prosecutor v. Tadic, Case No. IT-94-1-T, Judgment, 7 May 1997.
  • ICC, Office of the Prosecutor, Situation in the Republic of Kenya: Request for Authorisation of an Investigation Pursuant to Article 15, para. 106, ICC Doc. ICC- 01/09 (26 Nov. 2009).
  • International Criminal Court, Assembly activates Court’s Jurisdiction over Crime of Aggression, (https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=pr1350) Date accessed: 29.03.2018)
  • Katangaet al. (ICC-01/04-01/07), Decision on the Confirmation of the Charges, 30 September 2008.
  • Pre-Trial Chamber II, Decision Pursuant to Articles 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome Statute on the Charges of the Prosecutor Against Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, ICC-01/05-01/08-424.
  • Press Realise, 29 June 2016, State of Palestine becomes the thirtieth State to ratify the Kampala amendments on the crime of aggression. (https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=pr1225) Date accessed: 8.3.2017).
  • Prosecutor v. Goran Jelisić, (Appeals Judgement) IT-95-10-A (5 July 2001).
  • Prosecutor v. Clement Kayishema and Obed Ruzindana, (Appeals Judgement) ICTR-95-1-T (21 May 1999).
  • Prosecutor v. Goran Jelisić, (Appeals Judgement) IT-95-10-A (5 July 2001).
  • Prosecutor v. Kayishema and Ruzindana, Case No. ICTR-95-1-T, Judgment, (21 May 1998).
  • Prosecutor v. Goran Jelisić, (Appeals Judgement) IT-95-10-A (5 July 2001).
  • Prosecutor v. Clement Kayishema and Obed Ruzindana, (Appeals Judgement) ICTR-95-1-T (21 May 1999).
  • Prosecutor v. Jelisić, Case No. IT-95-10-A, Prosecution’s Appeal Brief (Redacted Version) (14 July 2000).
  • Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, Case No. ICC-02/05-01/09, Decision on the Prosecution’s Application for a Warrant of Arrest against Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir (4 March 2009).
  • Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, Case No. ICC-02/05, Summary of Prosecutor’s Application under Article 58 (14 July 2008).
  • Prosecutor v. Blagojevic and Jokic, Case No. IT-02-60-T, Judgment, 17 January 2005. Prosecutor v. Katanga, Case No: ICC-01/04-01/07, Confirmation of the Charges, 30 September 2008.
  • Republic of Turkey, Ministry for EU Affairs, National Programme for the Adoption of the Acquis (NPAA), (2008), Chapter 31, Foreign, Security and Defence Policy, p.394. (http://www.ab.gov.tr/?p=194&l=2 ) Date accessed: 14.6.2016).
  • Situation in the Republic of Kenya, (https://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/situations%20and%20cases/situations/situation%20icc%200109/Pages/situation%20index.aspx) Date accessed: 11.12.2015).
  • Statement by Mr. Ismail Aramaz, Head of the Turkish Delegation, ICC Review Conference, Kampala, 1 June 2010.
  • The new Turkish Penal Code, Code No. 5237, The Turkish Official Gazette No. 26611, 12 October 2004. It came into force on June 1, 2005.
  • The Turkish Military Penal Code.
  • United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, A/CONF.183/13, Official Records, Vol. II, 124.
Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2651-4141
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1997
  • Yayıncı: Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

TÜRKİYE’DE KATILIM SİGORTACILIĞI

Mehmet Ali AKSOY

HUKUKTA YAŞLI VE YAŞLILARA SUNULAN SOSYAL HİZMETLERİN İDARE HUKUKU AÇISINDAN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Çınar Can EVREN

TÜRK CEZA KANUNU VE ROMA STATÜSÜNDE DÜZENLENEN ULUSLARARASI SUÇLARA YÖNELİK ULUSLARARASI YARGI ORGANLARININ KARARLARI IŞIĞINDA KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ANALİZ

Zeynep ERHAN

TÜZEL KİŞİ YÖNETİM KURULU ÜYELERİNİN ANONİM ŞİRKETE BORÇLANMA YASAĞI

Ebru DEMİRCİ

ULUSLARARASI ADALET DİVANI’NIN REFORM İHTİYACI

Esra ATA

1919 MECLİS-İ MEBUSAN SEÇİMLERİNİN “KURUCU MECLİS OLUŞTURUCU” NİTELİĞİ

Mehmet Faruk KOÇAK