BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK ŞİRKETLER HUKUKUNDA ŞİRKET MERKEZİ (REGISTERED OFFICE) MECBURİYETİ

Makalemizin konusunu Birleşik Krallık Şirketler Hukukunda şirket merkezi mecburiyeti oluşturmaktadır. Birleşik Krallık hukuk sisteminin Kıta Avrupası hukuk sisteminden genel itibariyle soyutlanmış olduğu kabul edilmektedir. Bununla birlikte Avrupa Birliği düzenlemeleri sebebiyle bu iki hukuk sistemi arasında son yıllarda özellikle şirketler hukukunu ilgilendiren bir yakınlaşmanın olduğu dikkat çekmektedir. Bu yakınlaşmaya rağmen, şirket merkezi müessesesi Birleşik Krallık şirketler hukukunda özgünlüğünü koruyan bir kavram olarak Companies Act 2006’da muhtelif maddelerinde düzenlenmiştir. Şirket merkezi Birleşik Krallık şirketler hukukunda sadece şirketin kuruluşunda önemli bir etken değildir; şirketin faaliyetlerini yürütürken de şirket direktörlerini ve şirket sekreterlerini yakından ilgilendiren bir mecburiyet olarak Companies Act 2006’da düzenlenmiştir. Çalışmamızda Birleşik Krallık şirketler hukuku düzenlemeleri bağlamında mukayeseli hukuka katkı sağlamak amaçlanmıştır

THE REGISTERED OFFICE OBLIGATION IN UNITED KINGDOM COMPANY LAW

The subject of this article is the registered office obligation in United Kingdom Company Law. It is generally considered that United Kingdom law system is isolated from Continental European law system. However, it is noticed that there is a convergence between these two legal systems, in particular, concerning company law in the recent years due to the regulations of European Union. Despite this convergence, the institute of registered office is regulated as a concept which protects the authenticty in various articles of Companies Act 2006. The registered office is not only an important factor in the establishment for companies, but also regulated as * Bu makale University of London, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies’de 2012 HaziranEkim döneminde gerçekleştirilen post doctorate çalışmaları esas alınarak hazırlanmıştır.** Atatürk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Ticaret Hukuku Anabilim Dalı Öğretim Üyesian obligation for the company’s activities to be carried out concerning the company directors and secretaries in Companies Act 2006. In this study it is intended to contribute to the comparative law. regarding to the regulations of United Kingdom company law

___

  • APLIN, Tanya, Commercial Confidences After The Human Rights Act, European Intellectual Property Review, 2007, 29(10), s.411-419.
  • BAUERLE, Carsten Gerner / SCHILLIG, Michael, The Mysteries of Freedom of Establishment After Cartesio, International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 2010, 59 (2), s.303-323.
  • BIRDS, John / CLARK, Bryan / MacNEIL, Iain / McCORMACK, Gerard / TWIGG-FLESNER, Christian / VILLIERS, Charlotte, Boyle & Birds’ Company Law, 7th edition, Bristol 2009.
  • COBURN, Amy, The Growth of Bankruptcy Tourism in The United Kingdom, Insolvency Intelligence, 2012, 25 (1), s.8-11.
  • DAVIES, Paul L., Gower and Davies’ Principles of Modern Company Law, 18th edition, London 2008.
  • DIGNAM, Alan / LOWRY, John / PADFIELD, Nicola, Company Law, 6th edition, Oxford 2012.
  • DRURY, Robert, The European Private Company, European Business Organisation Law Review, 2008, 9(1), s.125-136.
  • EIDENMULLER, Horst / ENGERT, Andreas / HORNUF, Lars, Incorporating Under European Law: The Societas Europaea as A Vehicle For Legal Arbitrage, European Business Organization Law Review, 2009, 10 (1), s.1-33.
  • FARRAR, John H. / HANNIGAN, B renda, Farrar’s Company Law, 4th edition, London 1998.
  • FRENCH, Derek / MAYSON, Stephen / RYAN, Christopher L., Company Law, 27th edition, Oxford 2010.
  • GIRVIN, Stephen, / FRISBY, Sandra / HUDSON, Alastair, Charlesworth’s Company Law, 18th edition, London 2010.
  • HANNIGAN, Brenda, Company Law, 2nd edition, Oxford 2009.
  • HICKS, Andrew / GOO, S.H., Cases and Materials on Company Law, 6th edition, Oxford 2008.
  • LINKLATER, Lisa, Auditing The Auditors: The Companies Act 2006, Company Lawyer, 2008, 29(2), s.33-34.
  • MAKOWICZ, Bartosz / SAIFEE, Faisal, Societas Privata Europaea: The European Private Company, Company Lawyer, 2009, 30(8), s.227-232.
  • McCROSSAN, Christine P., Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing & Services Ltd. Case Comment, Employment Law Bulletin, 2012, 108(Apr), s.5-7.
  • MOSS, Gabriel, Head Office Functions: Test Triumphs in ECJ: Interedil, Insolvency Intelligence, 2011, 24 (8), s.126-128.
  • MUCCIARELLI, Federico M., Company “Emigration And EC Freedom of Establishment: Daily Mail Revisited, European Business Organization Law Review, 2008, 9(2), s.267-303.
  • PETTET, Ben / LOWRY, John / REISBERG, Arad, Pettet’s Company Law, 3rd edition, Essex 2009.
  • SEALY, Lean / WORTHINGTON, Sarah, Sealy’s Cases and Materials in Company Law, Oxford 2010.
  • SHEIKH, Saleem, Company Law Reform: Part 2, International Company and Commercial Law Review, 2006, 17(3), s.96-101.
  • STOLOWY, Nicole, Does The “Societas Europaea” or “European Company” Make A Significant Contribution to Construction of A European Company Law? Journal of Business Law, 2012, 5, s.363-378.
  • VAN DUZER, Peter, Registered Office and SAIL Address, Company Law Review, 2011, 34(20), s.157-160.
  • WERLAUFF, Erik, Relocating A Company within The EU, European Company Law, 2008, 5(3), s.136-139.
  • WILD, Charles / WEINSTEIN, Stuart, Smith and Keenan’s Company Law, 15th edition, Essex 2011.