Coğrafya Tahayyülleri: Ulusal Kimlik, Anlatı ve Sınır

Bu çalışma, birbiriyle bağlantılı üç araştırma alanı olan ulusal kimlik, anlatı ve sınır arasındaki ilişkileri incelemektedir. Bu üç kavram coğrafyanın üretimi ve yeniden inşası için elzemdir. Bu çalışma bu üç kavramı tanıtıp, bunlar arasındaki bağlantıları ortaya çıkarmakta ve bu şekilde ulusal kimliklerin sınır ve anlatı kavramları ile ilişkili bir şekilde anlaşılması ve çalışılması için kavramsal bir çerçeve çizmektedir. Ayrıca ulusal kimliklerin tarihsel olarak modern yapılar olduğu, anlatılar ile oluşturulduğu, içselleştirildiği, çoklu ve sürekli değişim halinde olduğu ileri sürülmektedir. Bu nedenle anlatı ve söylem kavramları bu kimliklerin üretimi ve yeniden inşası için gereklidir. Bu makale, aynı zamanda ulusal kimliklerin doğrudan sınır kurumu ile ilgili olduklarını savunmaktadır. Sınır kurumu kavramından kastedilen bir coğrafya üzerine çizilmiş fiziksel bir çizgi veya bir tel örgü değil, sosyal ve mekânsal benzerlik ve farklılaşmaların oluştuğu bir süreçtir. Bu kimliklere anlam veren işte bu sınır kurumu sürecidir.

Imagining Geography: National Identity, Narrative and Bordering

This paper explores the relationships between three interconnected research domains: national identity, narrative and border. These three concepts are crucial to produce and re-produce geography. This paper introduces these three concepts and explores how they are connected to each other, in order to draw a conceptual framework to understand and study national identities in relation to borders and narratives. The paper argues that national identities are historically modern constructs produced through narratives, internalised, multiple and subject to change. Narratives and discourses are significant to produce and reproduce these identities. Thus, narratives and identities are interdependent. This paper also argues that national identities are directly related to borders. By border concept, this paper does not only refer to a physical line or fences on space, but bordering as a process through which social and spatial homogenisations and differentiations occur. It is this bordering process that gives significance to identities.

___

  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Somers, M. R., & Gibson, G. D. (1993). Reclaiming the epistemological other: narrative and the social constitution of identity. CSST Working Papers. WP No: 94. USA: University of Michigan
  • Somers, M. R. (1994). The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and society, 23(5), 605-649.
  • Smith, A. D. (1986). The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.
  • Sack, R. D. (1986). Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Paasi, A. (2012). Border studies reanimated: going beyond the territorial/relational divide. Environment and Planning A, 44(10), 2303-2309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a45282
  • Paasi, A. (2011). A border theory: an unattainable dream or a realistic aim for border scholars?. In: Wastl-Walter, D. (Ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Border Studies, (pp. 11-31). London: Routledge.
  • Paasi, A. (1998). Boundaries as social processes: Territoriality in the world of flows. Geopolitics, 3(1), 69-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14650049808407608
  • Özkirimli, U. (2003). The nation as an artichoke? A critique of ethnosymbolist interpretations of nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 9(3), 339-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-8219.00100
  • Newman, D., & Paasi, A. (1998). Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 186-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/030913298666039113
  • Newman, D. (2006). The lines that continue to separate us: borders in our 'borderless' world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 143-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph599xx
  • Meinhof, U. H., & Galasinski, D. (2005). The language of belonging. In: The Language of Belonging (pp. 13-49). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (Vol. 142). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Hobsbawm, E. J. (1992). Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hall, S. (1996). Who needs identity. Questions of cultural identity, 16(2), 1-17.
  • Hall, S. (1992). The question of cultural identity. In: S. Hall, C. Nelson & P. Treichler (eds.), Modernity and Its Futures, (s. 595-635). Oxford: Polity Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. California: Stanford University Press.
  • Gellner, E. (2006). Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • De Fina, A. (2011). Discourse and identity. In: T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
  • De Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (1999). The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse & Society, 10(2), 149-173.
  • Bruner, J. (2004). Life as narrative. Social Research, 71(3), 691-710.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Thompson, J. B. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. USA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). Structures, habitus, practices. The logic of practice, 52-65.
  • Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Barth, F. (1998). Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. USA: Waveland Press.
  • Balibar, E. (2002). Politics and the Other Scene. London: Verso Books.
  • Bachelard, G. (1994). The Poetics of Space. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition. USA: University of Chicago Press.
  • Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso Books.
  • Agnew, J. (2008). Borders on the mind: re-framing border thinking. Ethics & Global Politics, 1(4), 175-191.