Reporting detailed information and acknowledging donor-cadavers: good practice recommendation for anatomists
Objectives: In order to facilitate a healthy and trusting relationship between anatomists and their society, appreciating the anatomical gift of the individuals that donated their bodies to science in every way possible remains central. Apart from memorial services and monuments, scientific articles themselves can be a good platform to show this appreciation. In this article, we aimed to an create and awareness among anatomists and researchers by evaluating the information given regarding donor-cadavers in their articles and see if they acknowledged them.Methods: We evaluated all articles that used human cadaveric specimens by Turkish anatomists published between January 2011 and April 2016 and assessed if researchers provided data on the age, gender, preservation technique(s), source, and ethical / legal permissions regarding the cadavers used.Results: Majority of the articles provided data about gender (74.5%) and age (68.9%). Preservation technique (56.6%) and source of specimens (50.5%) were reported less frequently. While 28.3% of the articles provided data on some form of ethical approval, only 11.8% of the articles provided data on the consent of the individuals. Ten (4.7%) articles acknowledged the cadavers and/or their families.Conclusion: We believe it is the duty of anatomists to promote body donation within their society by building a trustworthy relationship. Scientific articles that depend on donor-cadavers should also be used to promote this relationship. Therefore, awareness among anatomists should be raised to discuss ethical grounds for scientific research on cadavers.
___
- 1. Dyer GSM, Thorndike EL. Quidne mortui vivos docent? The
evolving purpose of human dissection in medical education. Acad
Med 2000;75:969–70.
- 2. Winkelmann A. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical
school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ 2007;41:15–22.
- 3. Hildebrandt S. What is happening in our anatomical dissection
rooms? Clin Anat 2014;27:833–4.
- 4. Lemmp HK. Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical
school: beyond learning about anatomy. A qualitative study. Med
Educ 2005;39:318–25.
- 5. Winkelmann A, Heinze AK, Hendrix S. Acknowledging tissue donation:
human cadaveric specimens in musculoskeletal research. Clin
Anat 2016;29:65–9.
- 6. Jones TW, Lachman N, Pawlina W. Honoring our donors: a survey
of memorial ceremonies in United States anatomy programs. Anat
Sci Educ 2013;7:219–23.
- 7. Subasinghe SK, Jones DG. Human body donation programs in Sri
Lanka: Buddhist perspectives. Anat Sci Educ 2015;8:484–9.
- 8. Bohl M, Holman A, Mueller DA, Gruppen LD, Hildebrandt S. The
willed body donor interview project: medical student and donor
expectations. Anat Sci Educ 2012;6:90–100.
- 9. Talarico EF. A change in paradigm: giving back identity to donors in
the anatomy laboratory. Clin Anat 2013;26:161–72.
- 10. Bolt S. Bodies does matter: Gift giving and the unveiling of body
donor monuments in the Netherlands. Med Anthropol Q 2012;26:
613–34.
- 11. Gürses ‹A, Coflkun O, Gürtekin B, Kale A. The amount of information
provided in articles published in Clinical Anatomy and Surgical
and Radiologic Anatomy regarding human cadaveric materials and
trends in acknowledging donors/cadavers. Surg Radiol Anat 2016;8:
1225–31.
- 12. Google Scholar [database on the Internet]. Mountain View (CA):
c2004 Google Inc; [cited 2016, Apr 20]. Available from: http://www.
scholar.google.com
- 13. Benninger B. Formally acknowledging donor-cadaver-patients in the
basic and clinical science research arena. Clin Anat 2013;26:810–3.
- 14. McHanwell S, Brenner E, Chirculescu ARM, Drukker J, van
Mameren H, Mazzotti G, Pais D, Paulsen F, Plaisant O, Caillaud
MM, Laforet E, Riedere BM, Sanudo JR, Bueno-Lopez JL, Donate-
Oliver F, Sprumont P, Teofilovski-Parapid G, Moxham BJ. The
legal and ethical framework governing body donation in Europe – A
review of current practice and recommendations for good practice.
Eur J Anat 2008;12:1–24.
- 15. Riederer BM. Body donations today and tomorrow: what is best
practice and why? Clin Anat 2016;29:11–8.
- 16. Organ ve doku alınması, saklanması, aşılanması ve nakli hakkında
kanun. Kanun numarası: 2238. http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/Mevzuat
Metin/1.5.2238.pdf Accessed 20 April 2016
- 17. Sağlık Bakanlığı ve bağlı kuruluşların teşkilat ve görevleri hakkında
kanun hükmünde karaname ile bazı kanunlarda değişliklik
yapılmasına dair kanun. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/
2014/01/20140118.pdf Accessed 20 April 2016
- 18. Çubukçu B. Kadavras›z anatomi dersi. Al Jazeera Turk 09 February
2016 http://www.aljazeera.com.tr/al-jazeera-ozel/kadavrasiz-anatomidersi
Accessed 20 April 2016
- 19. Hürriyet. Doktor adaylarına ithal kadavra. Hürriyet Kelebek. 23
January 2016 http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/doktor-adaylarina-ithalkadavra-
40044207 Accessed 20 April 2016
- 20. Sözcü. Çin’den kadavra ithal edeceğiz. Sözcü Gazetesi. 28 April
2015. http://www.sozcu.com.tr/2015/gundem/cinden-kadavra-ithaledecegiz-
816673/ Accessed 20 April 2016
- 21. Champney TH. The business of bodies: ethical perspectives on forprofit
body donation companies. Clin Anat 2016;29:25–9
- 22. İnsan cesedi üzerinde bilimsel araştırrma yapılmasına ilişkin yönetmelik.
http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/main.aspx?home=http://www.
resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/17727.pdf&main=http://www.resmigazete.
gov.tr/arsiv/17727.pdf Accessed 20 April 2016
- 23. TÜBİTAK. Etik kurul onay belgesi bilgi notu. Temmuz 2014.
http://tubitak.gov.tr/sites/default/files/etik_onay_bilgi_notu_23_07_
13.pdf Accessed 22 December 2016
- 24. Bezmialem Vakıf Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Etik kurul
yönlendirme flemas›. http://sbe.bezmialem.edu.tr/Documents/BVU_
Etik_Kurul_Yonlendirme_Semasi-r.pdf Accessed 22 December 2016
- 25. Champney TH. A proposal for a policy on the ethical care and use
of cadavers and their tissues. Anat Sci Educ 2011;4:49–52.
- 26. International Federation of Associations of Anatomists. (2012)
Recommendations of good practice for the donation and study of
human bodies and tissues for anatomical examination. Plexus January
2012:4-5. http://ifaa.net/index.php/plexus/finish/3-plexus/3-plexus-
2012/0 Accessed 20 April 2016
- 27. Jones DG. Searching for good practice recommendations on body
donation across diverse cultures. Clin Anat 2016;29:55–9.
- 28. Jones DG, Whitaker MI. Anatomy’s use of unclaimed bodies:
Reasons against continued dependence on an ethically dubious practice.
Clin Anat 2012;25:246–54.
- 29. Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy. Ulusal Anatomi
Haftası Basın Bildirgesi 2012 http://www.anatomidernegi.org.tr/
kadavra-bagisi-ve-temini Accessed 20 April 2016
- 30. Erenoğlu C. Herkes onu konuşuyor! HaberTürk Pazar 02.09.2012
http://www.haberturk.com/saglik/haber/772940-herkes-onukonusuyor
Accessed 20 April 2016
- 31. Defining the role of authors and contributions [homepage on the
Internet]. Philadelphia: c2015 International Committee of Medical
Journal Editors; [updated 2006 May 26; cited 2016 Apr 20]. Available
from: http://www.icmje.org. Accessed 20 April 2016