Acil Servis Sağlık Çalışanlarında COVID-19 Dönemindeki Yaşam Kalitesinin Algılanan Strese Etkisi

Amaç: Araştırmanın amacı, COVID-19 pandemisinde acil serviste görevli sağlık çalışanlarının yaşam kalitesinin algılanan stres üzerine etkisini incelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Araştırmanın evreni 265 kişiden oluşmaktadır. Örnekleme yapılmadan tüm evrene ulaşılması hedeflenmiş ve 201 kişiye ulaşılabilmiştir. Araştırma verileri anket formu kullanılarak yüz yüze görüşme yöntemi ile toplanmıştır. Anket formu katılımcı bilgi formu, COV19-QoLTR ölçeği ve algılanan stres ölçeği olmak üzere 3 bölümden oluşmaktadır. Verilerin analizinde IBM SPSS 27 programı yardımıyla parametrik testlerden yararlanılmıştır. Bulgular: Araştırma katılımcılarının %57,7’sini kadınlar, %47,8’ini lisans mezunu kişiler, %63,2’sini hemşireler, %70,6’sını 5 yıl ve daha az süredir çalışanlar ve %83,1’ini vardiyalı çalışanlar oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada evli olanların, ortalama üstünde yaşa sahip olanların ve pandemi sebebiyle bir yakınını kaybetmiş olanların COV19-QoLTR puan ortalamalarının anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca vardiyalı çalışan personelin sabit mesaide çalışanlara göre ve doktorların da hemşire ve diğer sağlık personeline göre algılanan stres ölçeğinden daha yüksek puanlara sahip olduğu ortaya konmuştur. Sonuç: Araştırma sonucunda acil sağlık çalışanlarında COVID-19 pandemisinin yaşam kalitesi üzerindeki olumsuz etkisinin algılanan stresi anlamlı şekilde etkilediği ve artırdığı tespit edilmiştir.

The Effect of Quality of Life on Perceived Stress in Emergency Service Healthcare Professionals in the Period of COVID-19

Aim: The aim of the study is to examine the effect of the quality of life of healthcare workers in the emergency service on perceived stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and Methods: The population of the study consists of 265 people. It was aimed to reach the whole population without sampling and 201 people could be reached. Research data were collected by face-to-face interview method using a questionnaire. The questionnaire form consists of 3 parts: participant information form, COV19-QoLTR scale and perceived stress scale. In the analysis of the data, parametric tests were used with the help of IBM SPSS 27 program. Results: 57.7% of the research participants are women, 47.8% are undergraduates, 63.2% are nurses, 70.6% are working for 5 years or less, and 83.1% are shift workers. In the study, it was observed that the COV19-QoLTR score averages of those who were married, those who were above the average age, and those who had lost a relative due to the pandemic were significantly higher. In addition, it has been revealed that the personnel working in shifts have higher scores on the perceived stress scale than those working in fixed shifts, and the doctors according to the nurses and other health workers. Conclusion: As a result of the study, it was determined that the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of life of emergency health workers significantly affected and increased the perceived stress.

___

  • 1. Sağlık Bakanlığı. COVID-19 nedir? 2022. Erişim Adresi: https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/TR-66300/covid-19-nedir-.html Erişim tarihi: 26.10.2022.
  • 2. WHO. WHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard; 2022. Erişim Adresi: https://covid19.who.int/ Erişim tarihi:15.10.2022.
  • 3. Sağlık Bakanlığı. COVID-19 bilgilendirme platformu; 2022. Erişim Adresi: https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/ Erişim tarihi:15.10.2022.
  • 4. WHO Quality of Life Assessment Group. What quality of life?. World Health Forum 1996 ; 17(4) : 354-356 Erişim Adresi: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/54358.
  • 5. Barlow DH, Harris BA, Eustis EH, Farchione TJ. The unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders. World Psychiatry. 2020; 19: 245-246. doi:10.1002/wps.20748.
  • 6. Rabacal J, Oducado RM, Tamdang K. COVID-19 impact on the quality of life of teachers: a cross-sectional study. Asian J Public Opin Res. 2020; 8(4): 478-492. doi: 10.15206/ajpor.2020.8.4.478.
  • 7. Kaya ŞD, Mehmet N, Şafak K. Professional commitment, satisfaction and quality of life of nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Konya, Turkey. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2022; 32(2): 393-404. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v329i2.20.
  • 8. Khodami MA, Seif MH, Koochakzadeh RS, Fathi R, Kaur H. Perceived stress, emotion regulation and quality of life during the Covid-19 outbreak: A multi-cultural online survey. Ann Med Psychol. 2020;180(6): 514-518. doi: 10.1016/j.amp.2021.02.005.
  • 9. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company; 1984.
  • 10. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R.A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983; 24(4): 385–396. doi: 10.2307/2136404.
  • 11. Penacoba C, Catala P, Velasco L, Carmona Monge FJ, Garcia Hedrera FJ, Gil Almagro F. Stress and quality of life of intensive care nurses during the COVID 19 pandemic: Self efficacy and resilience as resources. Nurs Crit Care. 2021; 26(6): 493-500. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12690.
  • 12. Repisti S, Jovanović N, Kuzman MR, Medved S, Jerotić S, Ribić E, et al. How to measure the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on quality of life: COV19-QoL–the development, reliability and validity of a new scale. Glob Psychiatr Arch. 2020; 3(2). 1-10. doi: 10.2478/gp-2020- 0016.
  • 13. Sümen A, Adibelli D. Adaptation of the COV19-QoL scale to Turkish culture: Its psychometric properties in diagnosed and undiagnosed individuals. Death Stud. 2021; 46(10): 2298-2305. doi:10.1080/07481187.2021.1925376.
  • 14. Bilge A, Öğce UF, Genç RE, Oran NT. Algılanan stres ölçeğinin (ASÖ) Türkçe versiyonunun psikometrik uygunluğu. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi. 2009; 2: 61- 72.
  • 15. Karagöz Y. SPSS ve AMOS 23 uygulamalı istatistiksel analizler. Ankara: Nobel Kitabevi; 2016.
  • 16. Plichta SB, Kelvin EA, Munro BH. Munro's statistical methods for health care research. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
  • 17. Kolias P, Pliafa O. The relationship between quality of life and physical exercise with depression and perceived stress during the second COVID-19 lockdown in Greece. Psych. 2022; 4(3): 549-559. doi: 10.3390/psych4030042.
  • 18. Alhawatmeh H, Alsholol R, Dalky H, Al-Ali N, Albataineh R. Mediating role of resilience on the relationship between stress and quality of life among Jordanian registered nurses during COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon. 2021; 7(11): 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08378.
  • 19. Taspinar B, Taspinar F, Gulmez H, Kizilirmak AS. Fizyoterapistlerde COVID-19 korkusu ve yaşam kalitesi arasındaki ilişki. Forbes J Med. 2021; 2(2): 108-115. doi: 10.5222/forbes.2021.54376.
  • 20. Dehkordi AH, Aslani M, Ebadi A, Repišti S, Moradveisi B, Gheshlagh RG. Examination of the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the COVID-19-impact on Quality of Life Scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021;19(1): 1-8. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01829-2.
  • 21. Mohsen S, El-Masry R, Ali OF, Abdel-Hady D. Quality of life during COVID-19 pandemic: a community-based study in Dakahlia governorate, Egypt. Glob Health Res Policy. 2022; 7(1): 1-9. doi: 10.1186/s41256-022-00246-2.
  • 22. Hargreaves SM, Nakano EY, Han H, Raposo A, Ariza-Montes A, Vega- Muñoz A, Zandonadi RP. Quality of life of vegetarians during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. Nutrients. 2021; 13(8): 1-12. doi: 10.3390/nu13082651.
  • 23. Teotonio I, Hecht M, Castro LC, Gandolfi L, Pratesi R, Nakano EY, Zandonadi RP, Pratesi CB. Repercussion of COVID-19 pandemic on Brazilians’ quality of life: A nationwide cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(22): 1-11. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228554.
  • 24. Qi M, Li P, Moyle W, Weeks B, Jones C. Physical activity, health-related quality of life, and stress among the Chinese adult population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(18): 1-10. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186494.
  • 25. Ataç Ö, Hayran OE, Emreciksin A. Anxiety and depression levels of doctors during studying for examination for specialty in medicine. ESTÜDAM Halk Sağlığı Dergisi. 2019; 4(1), 35-44. doi: 10.35232/estudamhsd.475125.
  • 26. Charsouei S, Esfahlani MZ, Dorosti A, Zamiri RE. Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on perceived stress, quality of life, and coping strategies of women with breast cancer with spinal metastasis under chemotherapy. Int J Womens Health Reprod Sci. 2021; 9(1): 55-60. doi: 10.15296/ijwhr.2021.10.
  • 27. Altunan B, Unal A, Bingöl A, Dilek F, Girgin D. Coping with stress during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic by Turkish people with Multiple Sclerosis: The relationship between perceived stress and quality of life. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021; 53: 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103039.
  • 28. Taşdelen R, Ayik B, Kaya H, Erciş M, Ertekin E. Türk sağlık çalışanlarının Covid-19 pandemisine psikolojik tepkileri: Damgalanmanın etkisi. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2022; 59(2); 133-138. doi: 10.29399/npa.27785.
  • 29. Ortega-Galan ÁM, Ruiz-Fernández MD, Lirola MJ, Ramos-Pichardo JD, Ibáñez-Masero O, Cabrera-Troya J, et al. Professional quality of life and perceived stress in health professionals before COVID-19 in Spain: primary and hospital care. Healthc. 2020; 8(4): 1-10. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040484.
  • 30. Ruiz Fernández MD, Ramos Pichardo JD, Ibáñez Masero O, Cabrera Troya J, Carmona Rega MI, Ortega Galan ÁM. Compassion fatigue, burnout, compassion satisfaction and perceived stress in healthcare professionals during the COVID 19 health crisis in Spain. J Clin Nurs. 2020; 29(21-22): 4321-4330. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15469.