Prenatal Tarama ve Teşhis Prosedürlerinin Gebe Kadınlar, Engelliler ve Toplum Üzerindeki Olası Etkilerine Dair Normatif Bir Değerlendirme

Prenatal tarama ve teşhis prosedürleri fetüsün sağlığı ile ilgili in utero bilgi edinmeyi amaçlayanve sağlayan uygulamalardır. Bu prosedürler kimi zaman gebe kadın, kimi zaman datoplum için yararlı oldukları argümanıyla savunulmakta ve desteklenmektedir. Bu çalışmadaprenatal testlerin kadınlar, engelliler ve toplum üzerindeki olası etkilerine dair normatifbir analiz sunulacak, ardından bunların kimin yararına ya da kimin hakkı olarak uygulandığısorusuna cevap aranacaktır.

A Normative Assessment of Possible Effects of Prenatal Testing and Diagnostic Procedures on Pregnant Women, the Disabled, and the Society

Prenatal testing and diagnostic procedures are a variety of intervention that aim to provide and do provide in utero information about the health of the fetus. These procedures are supported and argued for on grounds that they are beneficent occasionally for the pregnant woman or the society. This study presents a normative analysis on the possible effects of prenatal testing on women, the disabled, and the society, subsequently followed by an inquiry as to whose interests or rights provide the justificatory basis for such intervention.

PDF

___

Kıran H, Kıran G, Güven MA. Maternal yaşın gebelik seyri ve fetal prognoz üzerine etkileri. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Derg. 2003;12(2).
Statham H, Solomou W, Chitty L. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality: psychological effects on women in low-risk pregnancies. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14(4):731–47.
Bunim J. UCSF surgeon reflects on performing world’s first fetal surgery 30 years ago. USCF. 2011. www.ucsf.edu/ news/2011/02/9366/ucsf-surgeon-reflectsperformingworlds-first-fetal-surgery-30-years-ago.
Tosun F, Bilgin A, Kizilok A, Arpaci A, Yüregir G. Five-year evaluation of premarital screening program for hemoglobinopathies in the province of Mersin, Turkey. Turk J Hematol. 2006;23(2):84–9.
Platon. Devlet, 15. ed. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları; 2008
Aksoy S. Antenatal screening and its possible meaning from unborn baby’s perspective. BMC Med Ethics. 2001;2(1):1.
Heyd D. Prenatal diagnosis: whose right? J Med Ethics. 1995;21(5):292–7.
Dixon DP. Informed consent or institutionalized eugenics? How the medical profession encourages abortion of fetuses with Down syndrome. Issues Law Med. 2008;24(1):3–59.
Reindal SM. Disability, gene therapy and eugenics: a challenge to John Harris. J Med Ethics. 2000;26(2):89– 94.
David HP, Fleischhacker J, Hohn C. Abortion and eugenics in Nazi Germany. Popul Dev Rev. 1988;14(1):81– 112.
Çaha H. Elemeci kürtaj: öjenizmin yeni yüzü. İş Ahlakı Derg. 2014;7(2):53.
Wasserman D, Asch A. The uncertain rationale for prenatal disability screening. Virtual Mentor. 2006;8(1):53– 6.
Bişgin A. Hemoglobinopatilerde moleküler genetik tanı ve genetik danışmanlık. Zirve Tıp Derg. 2016;1(2):54–8.
Savulescu J. Resources, Down’s syndrome, and cardiac surgery. BMJ. 2001;322(7291):875.
Binkert F, Mutter M, Schinzel A. Impact of prenatal diagnosis on the prevalence of live births with Down syndrome in the eastern half of Switzerland 1980–1996. Swiss Med Wkly. 2002;132(33/34):478–84.
Harris RA, Washington AE, Nease RF, Kuppermann M. Cost utility of prenatal diagnosis and the risk-based threshold. Lancet. 2004;363(9405):276–82.
Asch A. Why I haven’t changed my mind about prenatal diagnosis: reflections and refinements. Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights, ed. Parens E, Asch A. Washington, DC/ABD: Georgetown University Press; 2000.
Wasserman D, Asch A. Selecting for disability: acceptable lives, acceptable reasons. AJOB. 2012;12(8):30–1.
Duster T, Beeson D. Pathways and Barriers to Genetic Testing and Screening: Molecular Genetics Meets the “High-risk Family.” Berkeley, CA/ABD: Institute for the Study of Social Change; 1997.
Middleton A, Hewison J, Mueller RF. Attitudes of deaf adults toward genetic testing for hereditary deafness. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63(4):1175–80.
Singer P. Pratik Etik, çev. Çatlı N. İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları; 2015.
Harris J. One principle and three fallacies of disability studies. J Med Ethics. 2001;27(6):383–7.
Savulescu J. Is current practice around late termination of pregnancy eugenic and discriminatory? Maternal interests and abortion. J Med Ethics. 2001;27(3):165–71.
Wasserman D, Asch A. A duty to discriminate? AJOB. 2012;12(4):22–4.
Edwards SD. Disability, identity and the “expressivist objection.” J Med Ethics. 2004;30(4):418–20.
Rothman BK. The tentative pregnancy: then and now. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993;8:60–3.
Shakespeare TOM. Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality. Disabil Soc. 1998;13(5):665– 81.
Illich I. Sağlığın Gaspı, çev. Serthabiboğlu S. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları; 2014.
Barker KK. A ship upon a stormy sea: the medicalization of pregnancy. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(8):1067–76.
Lenhard W, Breitenbach E, Ebert H, Schindelhauer-Deutscher HJ, Zang KD, Henn W. Attitudes of mothers towards their child with down syndrome before and after the introduction of prenatal diagnosis. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2007;45(2):98–102.
Bewley S. Restricting the freedom of pregnant women. Ethical Issues in Maternal–Fetal Medicine, ed. Dickenson D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002
Chiang HH, Chao YM, Yuh YS. The maternal self in pregnant women undergoing maternal serum screening. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16(6):1180–5.
Alderson P. Down’s syndrome: cost, quality and value of life. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(5):627–38.
McDonagh E. Models of motherhood in the abortion debate: self-sacrifice versus self-defence. Ethical Issues in Maternal–Fetal Medicine, ed. Dickenson D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
Alderson P. Prenatal counselling and images of disability. Ethical Issues in Maternal–Fetal Medicine, ed. Dickenson D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
Alderson P. Prenatal screening, ethics and Down’s syndrome: a literature review. Nurs Ethics. 2001;8(4):360–74.
Garcia E, Timmermans DR, van Leeuwen E. Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decisionmaking. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28(2):115–20.
West R. From choice to reproductive justice: deconstitutionalizing abortion rights. Yale Law J. 2009:1394–432.
Ergün P, Köken GN, Coşar E, Şahin FK, Arıöz DT, Yılmazer M. Gebelerin üçlü tarama testi ve gebelikte yapılan diğer testler hakkındaki bilgi düzeyinin ölçülmesi. TAF Prev Med Bul. 2011;10(4).
Karakuş R. Gebelerin ikili ya da üçlü testler hakkındaki bilgi düzeyinin araştırılması. Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Derg. 2015;12(5).
Green JM, Statham H, Snowdon C. Women’s knowledge of prenatal screening tests. 1: Relationships with hospital screening policy and demographic factors. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 1993;11(1):11–20.
de Graaf IM, Tijmstra T, Bleker OP, Van Lith JM. Women’s preference in Down syndrome screening. Prenat Diagn. 2002;22(7):624–9.
Williams C, Alderson P, Farsides B. Is nondirectiveness possible within the context of antenatal screening and testing? Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(3):339–47.
Asch A. Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a challenge to practice and policy. Am J of Public Health. 1999;89(11):1649–57.