YAHUDİ DİASPORASI DİASPORA ÇALIŞMALARINDA BİR İDEAL TİP OLARAK KALMALI MI?1

Diaspora literatürünün öncü eserlerinde Yahudi diasporası örneği bir "ideal tip" olarak değerlendirilmiş, Yahudi diasporasının sahip olduğu birçok özellik, bir topluluğun diaspora olarak etiketlenmesinde kıstas konumuna taşınmıştır. Ancak, diaspora literatüründe son yıllarda söz konusu ideal tipleştirmeye karşı, diaspora kavramını daha esnek kıstaslarla tanımlayan eserler ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu çalışma, öncelikle diaspora literatürünü Yahudi ideal tipleştirmesine karşı tavrı bağlamında sınıflandırmış ve "Yahudi diasporası diaspora çalışmalarında bir ideal tip olarak kalmalı mı?" sorusuna anlamlı bir cevap vermeyi amaçlamıştır. ilişkilendirilerek yekparelik vurgusuyla yanlış ve/veya eksik bir biçimde tanımlanan diasporaların içyapılarındaki heterojenliğe dikkat çeken bir yaklaşım önerilmiştir. Bu yaklaşımın diaspora kavramını aşırı esnetmesinin yaratacağı sıkıntıları aşabilmek amacıyla bir topluluğun diaspora olarak etiketlenmesinde "diasporik bilinç" bir kıstas noktasına taşınmıştır

SHOULD JEWISH DIASPORA STAY AS AN IDEAL TYPE IN DIASPORA STUDIES?

The major intellectual forerunners of the diaspora literature had considered the Jewish diaspora as an “ideal type”, and assigned the characteristics of the Jewish diaspora as criteria for labeling diasporas. However, in recent studies, flexible definitions of diaspora emerged in reaction to the scientific idealization of the Jewish diaspora example. This study firstly classified diaspora literature according to its reaction towards the idealization of the Jewish example and sought to give a meaningful answer to the question “Should Jewish diaspora stay as an ideal type in diaspora studies?”. The study also proposed an approach that remarked the intra-heterogeneity of diaspora groups - which were often incorrectly and/or incompletely defined with an emphasis on their so-called monolithic ethnicity. In order to overcome the difficulties caused by the over stretching of the term “diaspora” in line with the proposed approach, the term “diasporic consciousness” is suggested as a criterion in labeling diasporas

___

  • Akenson, Donald Harman (2010), “Diaspora, the Irish, and Irish Nationalism”, Gal, Allon, Athena S. Leoussi ve Antony D. Smith (Der.), The Call of the Homeland: Diaspora Nationalisms, Past and Present (Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers): 169-218.
  • Alexander, Jeffrey J. (2004), “Toward a Theory of Cultural Trauma”, Alexander, Jeffrey J., Ron Eyerman, Bernard Giesen, Neil J. Smelser ve Piotr Sztompka (Der.), Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity (Berkeley: University of California Press): 1-30.
  • Anteby-Yemini, Lisa ve William Berthomiere (2005), “Diaspora: A Look Back on a Concept”, Bulletin du Centre de Recherche Français à Jérusalem, (16): 262- 270.
  • Anthias, Floya (1998), “Evaluating ‘Diaspora’: Beyond Ethnicity”, Sociology, 32 (3): 1-15.
  • Askeland, Gurid Aga ve Anne Margrethe Sønneland (2011), “You will Never Again be a Chilean Like the Others: From Diaspora to Diasporic Practices among Chilean Refugees Returning from Exile”, Journal of Comparative Social Work, 6 (1): 1-18.
  • Aviv, Carny ve David Shneer (2005), New Jews: The End of the Jewish Diaspora (New York: New York University).
  • Başer, Bahar (2015), Diasporas and Homeland Conflicts – a Comparative Perspective (Farnham: Ashgate).
  • Baumann, Martin (2000), “Diaspora: Genealogies of Semantics and Transcultural Comparison”, Numen, 47: 313-337.
  • Baumann, Martin (2009), “Migration and Religion”, Clarke, Peter B. ve Peter Beyer, The World’s Religions: Continuities and Transformations (Oxon, Routledge): 338-353.
  • Bein, Alex, (1990), The Jewish Question: Biography of a World Problem (Londan: Associated University Press).
  • Bilgiç, Tuba Ünlü ve Bestami S. Bilgiç (2012), “Kosova Türkleri: ‘Sıradışı’ Bir Türk Diasporası”, Bilig, (62): 41-62.
  • Boyarin, Daniel, (2015), A Travelling Homeland: The Babylonian Talmud as Diaspora (Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press).
  • Brubaker, Rogers (2005), “The ‘Diaspora’ Diaspora”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28 (1): 1-19.
  • Burnes, Theodore R. ve Mindy M. Chen (2012), “The Multiple Identities of Transgender Individuals – Incorporating a Framework of Intersectionality to Gender Crossing”, Josselson, Ruthellen ve Michele Harway (Der.), Navigating Multiple Identities – Race, Gender, Culture, Nationality, and Roles (New York: Oxford University Press): 113-128.
  • Butler, Kim (2001), “Defining Diaspora, Refining a Discourse”, Diaspora, 10 (2): 189-219.
  • Chaliand, Gérard ve Jean-Pierre Rageau (1995), The Penguin Atlas of Diasporas (New York: Viking).
  • Chan, Yuk Wah (2013), “Hybrid Diaspora and Identity-Laundering: a Study of the Return Overseas Chinese Vietnamese in Vietnam”, Asian Ethnicity, 14 (4): 525-541.
  • Clifford, James (1994), “Diasporas”, Cultural Anthropology, 9 (3): 302-338.
  • Cohen, Robin (1997), Global Diasporas – an Introduction (Londan: UCL Press).
  • Cohen, Robin (2008), Global Diasporas – an Introduction (New York: Routledge).
  • Collar, Anna (2013), “Re-thinking Jewish Ethnicity Through Social Network Analysis”, Knappett, Carl (Der.), Network Analysis in Archaeology – New Approaches to Regional Integration (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 223-246.
  • Crenshaw, Kimberle (1993), “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color”, Stanford Law Review, 43 (6): 1241-1299.
  • Davis, Kathy (2008), “Intersectionality a Buzzword – A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful”, Feminist Theory, 9 (1): 67-85.
  • Dennis, Ann (2008), “Intersectional Analysis. A Contribution of Feminism to Sociology”, International Sociology, 23 (5): 677-694.
  • Dufoix, Stephane (2008), Diasporas (Berkeley: University of California Press).
  • Dufoix, Stephane (2009), “Deconstructing and Reconstructing ‘Diaspora’: a Study in Socio-Historical Semantics”, Ben-Rafael, Eliezer, Yitzhak Sternberg, Judit Bokser Liwerant ve Yosef Gorny (Der.), Transnationalism – Diasporas and the Advent of a New (Dis)order (Leiden: Brill): 47-74.
  • Edwards, Brent Hayes (2006), “The Uses of ‘Diaspora”, Fabre, Genevieve ve Klaus Benesch (Der.), African Diasporas in the New and Old Worlds – Consciousness and Imagination (New York: Rodopi): 3-38.
  • Eliassi, Barzoo (2013), Contesting Kurdish Identities in Sweden: Quest for Belonging among Middle Eastern Youth (New York: Palgrave Macmillan). Fialkova, Larisa ve Maria N. Yelenevskaya (2005), “Incipient Soviet Diaspora: Encounters in Cyberspace”, Narodna Umjetnost, 42 (1): ss. 83-99.
  • Frykman, Maja Povrzanovic (2004), “Transnational Perspective in Ethnology: From ‘Ethnic’ to ‘Diasporic’ Communities”, Frykman, Maja Povrzanovic (Der.), Transnational Spaces: Disciplinary Perspectives (Malmö: Malmö University Press): 77-100.
  • Ghorashi, Halleh (2004), “How Dual is Transnational Identity? A Debate on Dual Positioning of Diaspora Organizations”, Culture and Organization, 10 (4): 329-340.
  • Habib, Jasmin (2004), Israel, Diaspora, and the Routes of National Belonging (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).
  • Hämmerli, Maria (2010), “Orthodox Diaspora? A Sociological and Theological Problematisation of a Stock Phrase”, International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church, 10 (2-3): 97-115.
  • James, Paul ve Anne McNevin (2013), “Would-be Citizens and ‘Strong States’: Circles of Security and Insecurity”, Steiner, Niklaus, Robert Mason and Anna Hayes (Der.), Migration and Insecurity – Citizenship and Social Inclusion in a Transnational Era (Oxon: Routledge): 87-108.
  • Jesch, Judith (2015), The Viking Diaspora (Oxon: Routledge).
  • Kenny, Kevin (2013), Diaspora – A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • King, Charles (2010), Extreme Politics: Nationalism, Violence, and the End of Eastern Europe (New York: Oxford University Press).
  • Koinova, Maria (2012), “Autonomy and Positionality in Diaspora Politics”, International Political Sociology, 6 (1): 99-103.
  • Kolstø, Pal (1999), “Territorialising Diasporas. The Case of the Russians in the Former Soviet Republics”, Millennium Journal of International Studies, 28 (3): 607-631.
  • Kürti, László (2001), The Remote Borderland: Transylvania in the Hungarian Imagination (New York: State University of New York Press).
  • Laitin, David D. (1998), Identity in Formation – The Russian-Speaking Population in the Near Abroad (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
  • Lee, Regina (2004), “Theorizing Diasporas: Three Types of Consciousness”, Goh, Robbie ve Shawn Wong (Der.), Asian Diasporas: Cultures, Identity and Representation (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press): 53-76.
  • Little, Bliss S. ve Benjamin J. Broome (2010), “Diaspora”, Jackson, Ronald L. (Der.), Encyclopedia of Identity, (Londan: Sage): 221-226.
  • MacRaild, Donald M. (2005), “Networks, Communication and the Irish Protestant Diaspora in Northern England, c. 1860-1914”, Immigrants and Minorities, 23 (2/3): 311-337.
  • McCaffrey, Lawrence J. (1997), The Irish Catholic Diaspora in America (Washington: The Catholic University of America Press).
  • Mishra, Vijay (2007), The Literature of the Indian Diaspora: Theorizing the Diasporic Imaginary (New York: Routledge).
  • Moghissi, Haideh (2006), “Introduction”, Moghissi, Haideh (Der.), Muslim Diaspora: Gender, Culture and Identity (Oxon: Routledge): xiv-xxv.
  • Ogden, Chris (2008), “Diaspora Meets IR’s Constructivism: An Appraisal”, Politics, 28 (1): 1-10.
  • Ohliger, Rainer ve Rainer Münz (2003), “Diasporas and Ethnic Migrants in Twentieth-Century Europe: a Comparative Perspective”, Münz, Rainer ve Rainer Ohliger (Der.), Diasporas and Ethnic Migrants - Germany, Israel and Post-Soviet Successor States in Comparative Perspective (Portland: Frank Cass Publishers): 3-17.
  • Pal, Adesh ve Tapas Chakraborty (2004), Theorizing and Critiquing Indian Diaspora (New Delhi: Creative Books).
  • Pasachoff, Naomi ve Robert J. Littman (2005), A Concise History of the Jewish People (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield).
  • Pilkington, Hilary ve Moya Flynn (2006), “A Diaspora in Diaspora? Russian Returnees Confront the ‘Homeland’”, Refuge, 23 (2): 55-66.
  • Prymak, Thomas (1998), “What Our Name is and Where We Come From? Thoughts on the Ukrainian Canadian Identity”, Ukrainian News, 9–23 Eylül.
  • Rai, Rajesh ve Peter Reeves (2009), “Introduction”, Rai, Rajesh ve Peter Reeves (Der.), The South Asian Diaspora – Transnational Networks and Changing Identities (Oxon: Routledge): 1-11.
  • Reis, Michele (2004), “Theorizing Diaspora: Perspectives on ‘Classical’ and ‘Contemporary’ Diaspora”, International Migration, 42 (2): 41-60.
  • Renard, Stanislas; Alexandru Manus ve Philip V. Fellman, “Understanding the Complexity of the Romany Diaspora”, http://necsi.edu/events/iccs7/papers/8914dd21fd6c18ed5437d025a87d.pdf (04.08.2015).
  • Ryan-Flood, Roisin (2009), “Sexuality, Citizenship and Migration: The Irish Queer Diaspora in London”, Full Research Report ESRC End of Award Report, RES-000-22-2612 (Swindon: ESRC).
  • Safran, William (1991), “Diasporas in Modern Societies: Myths of Homeland and Return”, Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 1 (1): 83-99.
  • Safran, William (2005), “The Jewish Diaspora in a Comparative and Theoretical Perspective”, Israel Studies, 10 (1): 36-60.
  • Sarzewich, Vic (2003), The Ukrainian Diaspora (Londan: Routledge). Schnapper, Dominique ve Denise L. Davis (1999), “From the Nation-State to the Transnational World: On the Meaning and Usefullness of Diaspora as a Concept”, Diaspora: a Journal of Transnational Studies, 8 (3): 225-254.
  • Sheffer, Gabriel (2003), Diaspora Politics – At Home Abroad (New York: Cambridge University Press).
  • Shepperson, George (1968), “The African Abroad, or the African Diaspora”, Ranger, T. O. (Der.), Emerging Themes of African History: Proceedings (Nairobi: East African Publishing House): 152-176.
  • Shuval, Judith T. (2000), “Diaspora Migration: Definitional Ambiguities and a Theoretical Paradigm”, International Migration, 38 (5): 41-57.
  • Sırma, Bilge ve Denis Ann (2010), “Introduction: Women, Intersectionality and Diasporas”, Journal of Intercultural Studies, 31 (1): 1-8.
  • Singh, Simran Jeet (2013), “Interrogating the Homeland-Diaspora Construct”, Michael Hawley (Der.), Sikh Diaspora: Theory, Agency, and Experience (Leiden: Brill): 51-67.
  • Skoggard, Ian (2006), “Talking Diasporas: A Cross-Cultural Comparison”, Korean Diaspora and Strategies of Global Networking (Kyoto: International Research Center for Japanese Studies): 35-52.
  • Smith, Antony D. (2004), Milli Kimlik (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları) (Çev. Bahadır Sina Şener).
  • Şenay, Banu (2012), “Trans-Kemalism: the Politics of the Turkish State in the Diaspora”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35 (9): 1615-1633.
  • Toth, Judit ve Endre Sik (2003), “Joining an EU Identity: Integration of Hungary or the Hungarians?”, Spohn, Willfried ve Anna Triandafyllidou (Der.), Europeanization, National Identities and Migration – Changes in Boundary Constructions between Western and Eastern Europe (Londan and New York: Routledge): 223-244.
  • Tölölyan, Khachig (1996), “Rethinking Diaspora(s): Stateless Power in the Transnational Movement”, Diaspora: a Journal of Transnational Studies, 5 (1): 3-36.
  • Tölölyan, Khachig (2012), “Diaspora Studies – Past, Present and Promise”, IMI Working Paper Series, (55): 3-13.
  • Ugresic, Dubravka (2006), The Ministry of Pain (New York: HarperCollinns Publishers).
  • Van Gorp, Jasmijn ve Kevin Smets (2015), “Diaspora Organizations, Imagined Communities and the Versatility of Diaspora: The Case of Former Yugoslav Organizations in Netherlands”, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18 (1): 70- 85.
  • Von Hagen, Mark (2014), “From Imperial Russia to Colonial Ukraine”, Healy, Roisin ve Enrico Dal Lago (Der.), The Shadow of Colonialism on Europe’s Modern Past (New York: Palgrave Macmillan): 173-194.
  • Waterbury, Myra A. (2010), “Bridging the Divide: towards a Comparative Framework for Understanding Kin State and Migrant-Sending State Diaspora Politics”, Bauböck, Rainer ve Thomas Faist (Der.), Diaspora and Transnationalism – Concepts, Theories, Methods (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press): 132-148.
  • Williams, Misti L. (2012), “Generations at Home and Abroad: the Chinese Diaspora”, Steele, Brent J. ve Jonathan M. Acuff (Der.), Theory and Application of the ‘Generation’ in International Relations and Politics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan): 123-146.
  • Winston, David (1995), “Reviewed Work: Das Selbstverständnis der Jüdischen Diaspora in der Hellenistisch-römischen Zeit by Willem Cornelis van Unnik”, AJS Review, 20 (2): 399-402.
  • Yuval, Israel J. (2006), “The Myth of the Jewish Exile from the Land of Israel”, Common Knowledge, 12 (1): 16-3.