___

• Acharya, Amitav. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies’.” International Studies Quarterly 58, no. 4 (2014): 647–59.
• Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives On and Beyond Asia. Taylor & Francis, 2009.
• ———. The Making of Global International Relations. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
• ———. “Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction’.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7, no. 3 (2007): 287–312.
• ———. “Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? Ten Years On’.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 17, no. 3 (2017): 341–70.
• Ahrens, Bettina. “The European Union Between Solidarist Change and Pluralist Re-Enactment’.” In International Organization in the Anarchical Society, edited by Tonny Brems Knudsen and Cornelia Navari. Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
• Ahrens, Bettina, and Thomas Diez. “Solidarisation and Its Limits: The EU and the Transformation of International Society’.” Global Discourse 5, no. 3 (2015): 341–55.
• Alvesson, Mats, and Kaj Sköldberg. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. First. London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2000.
• Anderl, Felix, and Antonia Witt. “Problematising the Global in Global IR’.” Millennium 49, no. 1 (2020): 32–57.
• Bartelson, Jens. “Towards a Genealogy of ‘Society’ in International Relations’.” Review of International Studies 41, no. 4 (2015): 675–92.
• Bevir, Mark, and Ian Hall. “Interpreting the English School: History, Science and Philosophy’.” Journal of International Political Theory 16, no. 2 (2020): 120–32.
• ———. “The English School and the Classical Approach: Between Modernism and Interpretivism’.” Journal of International Political Theory 16, no. 2 (2020): 153–70.
• Bilgin, Pinar. How to Globalise IR? E-IR, 2018. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/04/22/how-to-globalise-ir/.
• Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Macmillan, 1977.
• Bull, Hedley, and Adam Watson. The Expansion of International Society. Clarendon Press, 1984.
• Buranelli, Costa. “The English School and Regional International Societies: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections’.” In Regions in International Society. Brno Czech Republic: MUNI Press, 2014.
• Buranelli, Costa and Filippo. “Authoritarianism as an Institution? The Case of Central Asia’.” International Studies Quarterly 64, no. 4 (2020): 1005–16.
• ———. “Central Asian Regionalism or Central Asian Order? Some Reflections’.” Central Asian Affairs 8, no. 1 (2021): 1–26.
• ———. “‘Do You Know What I Mean?’ ‘Not Exactly’: English School, Global International Society and the Polysemy of Institutions’.” Global Discourse 5, no. 3 (2015): 499–514.
• ———. “Global International Society, Regional International Societies and Regional International Organizations: A Dataset of Primary Institutions’.” In International Organisations in the Anarchical Society. Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
• ———. “Is the English School Still an Underexploited Resource? And Whither the English School? An Introduction’.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33, no. 4 (2020): 464–66.
• ———. “Knockin’ on Heaven’s Door: Russia, Central Asia and the Mediated Expansion of International Society’.” Millennium 42, no. 3 (2014): 817–36.
• Buzan, Barry. An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach. 1st ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2014.
• ———. “Culture and International Society’.” International Affairs 86, no. 1 (2010): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00866.x.
• ———. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
• Buzan, Barry. Forthcoming. “Global Society: A Structural Account of Humankind Since the Ice Age,” n.d.
• Buzan, Barry, and Ana Gonzalez-Pelaez, eds. International Society and the Middle East: English School Theory at the Regional Level. 2009th ed. Basingstoke ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
• Buzan, Barry, and George Lawson. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
• Buzan, Barry, and Laust Schouenborg. Global International Society: A New Framework for Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2018.
• Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. International Systems In World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
• Buzan, Barry, and Yongjin Zhang, eds. Contesting International Society in East Asia. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
• Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe. Princeton University Press, 2007.
• Charmaz, Kathy C. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. 1st ed. London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2006.
• Dadabaev, Timur. “Decolonizing Central Asian International Relations: Central Asia in Post-Colonial Age”.” In Cambridge Central Asia Forum in Collaboration with the Centre of Development Studies and GCRF COMPASS Project, 2020. https://centralasia.group.cam.ac.uk/events/DadabaevTalk.
• Davidson, Donald. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford University Press, 2001.
• Deciancio, Melisa. “International Relations from the South: A Regional Research Agenda for Global IR’.” International Studies Review 18, no. 1 (2016): 106–19.
• Dunne, Tim, and Christian Reus-Smit, eds. The Globalization of International Society. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
• Falkner, Robert, and Barry Buzan. “The Emergence of Environmental Stewardship as a Primary Institution of Global International Society’.” European Journal of International Relations 25, no. 1 (2019): 131–55.
• Glaser, Barney G. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Sociology Press, 1978.
• Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter, 1967.
• Green, Daniel. “Improving upon ‘Expansion’: Metaphors to Shape the English School’s International History’.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33, no. 4 (2020): 474–76.
• Hinnebusch, Raymond. “The English School and the Periphery Regions: The Case of MENA and the Road Ahead’.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33, no. 4 (2020): 487–90.
• Hurrell, Andrew. “Beyond Critique: How to Study Global IR?” International Studies Review 18, no. 1 (2016): 149–51.
• ———. “Cultural Diversity within Global International Society’.” In Culture and Order in World Politics, edited by Andrew Phillips and Christian Reus-Smit. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
• Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. Routledge, 2010.
• Lasmar, Jorge M., Danny Zahreddine, and Delber Andrade Gribel Lage. “Understanding Regional and Global Diffusion in International Law: The Case for a Non-Monolithic Approach to Institutions’.” Global Discourse 5, no. 3 (2015): 470–96.
• Lees, Nicholas. “International Society Is to International System as World Society Is to ...? Systemic and Societal Processes in English School Theory’.” Journal of International Relations and Development 19, no. 3 (2016): 285–311.
• Linklater, Andrew, and Hidemi Suganami. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
• Liow, Joseph Chinyong. The Kinship Factor in International Relations: Kinship, Identity Construction, and Nation Formation in Indonesia-Malaysia Relations’. London School of Economics and Political Science, 2003.
• Navari, Cornelia. “Agents versus Structures in English School Theory: Is Co-Constitution the Answer?” Journal of International Political Theory 16, no. 2 (2020): 249–67.
• ———. Theorising International Society - English School Methods. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
• Navari, Cornelia, and Daniel Green, eds. Guide to the English School in International Studies. 1st ed. Chichester, West Sussex ; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.
• Navari, Cornelia, and Tonny Brems Knudsen, eds. International Organizations in the Anarchical Society. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
• Pardesi, Manjeet S. “Mughal Hegemony and the Emergence of South Asia as a ‘Region’ for Regional Order-Building’.” European Journal of International Relations 25, no. 1 (2018): 276–301.
• Parrat, Charlotta Friedner, Kilian Spandler, and Joanne Yao. “The English School as a Theory and a Scholarly Community’.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33, no. 4 (2020): 483–86.
• Parrat, Friedner and Charlotta. “On the Evolution of Primary Institutions of International Society’.” International Studies Quarterly 61, no. 3 (2017): 623–30.
• Pasha, Mustapha Kemal. “Decolonizing the Anarchical Society’.” In The Anarchical Society At, 40:92–110. Oxford University Press, 2017.
• Pella, John Anthony. Africa and the Expansion of International Society: Surrendering the Savannah. New York, NY: Routledge, 2014.
• Phillips, Andrew, and Christian Reus-Smit. Culture and Order in World Politics. Cambridge University Press, 2020.
• Phillips, Andrew, and J.C. Sharman. International Order in Diversity: War, Trade and Rule in the Indian Ocean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
• Quayle, Linda. Southeast Asia and the English School of International Relations - A Region-Theory Dialogue. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
• Schouenborg, Laust. The Scandinavian International Society: Primary Institutions and Binding Forces, 1815-2010. 1st ed. New York: Routledge, 2012.
• Schulz, Carsten-Andreas. “Territorial Sovereignty and the End of Inter-Cultural Diplomacy along the ‘Southern Frontier’’.” European Journal of International Relations 25, no. 3 (2019): 878–903.
• Sharma, Ananya. “Decolonizing International Relations: Confronting Erasures through Indigenous Knowledge Systems’.” International Studies 58, no. 1 (2021): 25–40.
• Spandler, Kilian. Regional Organizations in International Society: ASEAN, the EU and the Politics of Normative Arguing. Springer International Publishing, 2018.
• ———. “Regional Standards of Membership and Enlargement in the EU and ASEAN’.” Asia Europe Journal 16, no. 2 (2018): 183–98.
• Spruyt, Hendrik. “The World Imagined: Collective Beliefs and Political Order in the Sinocentric, Islamic and Southeast Asian International Societies.” In LSE International Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
• Stivachtis, Yannis, ed. “Interrogating Regional International Societies, Questioning the Global International Society’.” Global Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Current Affairs and Applied Contemporary Thought 5, no. 3 (2015).
• Suganami, Hidemi, Madeline Carr, and Adam Humphreys, eds. The Anarchical Society at 40: Contemporary Challenges and Prospects. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
• Suzuki, Shogo, Yongjin Zhang, and Joel Quirk, eds. International Orders in the Early Modern World: Before the Rise of the West. 1st ed. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York: Routledge, 2013.
• Taeuber, Simon F. “Reconstructing the Silk Road: Norm Contestation in Sino-European Relations in Times of the Belt and Road Initiative’.” Journal of Rising Powers and Global Governance 1, no. 1 (2020): 31–65.
• Terradas, Nicolás. “The Quest for Order in Anarchical Societies: Anthropological Investigations’.” International Studies Review 22, no. 1 (2020): 98–121.
• Tucker, Karen. “Unraveling Coloniality in International Relations: Knowledge, Relationality, and Strategies for Engagement’.” International Political Sociology 12, no. 3 (2018): 215–32.
• Tully, James. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. The Seeley Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
• Vigezzi, Brunelli. “The British Committee and International Society’.” In Guide to the English School of International Studies, 2014.
• Watson, Adam. The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis. Routledge, 1992.
• Weinert, Matthew S. “World Society and the Globality of IR’.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33, no. 4 (2020): 480–82.
• Wight, Martin. Systems of States. Leicester University Press [for] the London School of Economics and Political Science, 1977.
• Williams, John. Ethics, Diversity, and World Politics: Saving Pluralism From Itself? Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.
• Wilson, Peter. “The English School Meets the Chicago School: The Case for a Grounded Theory of International Institutions’.” International Studies Review 14, no. 4 (2012): 567–90.
• Yates, Robert. The English School and Postcolonial State Agency: Social Roles and Order Management in Southeast Asia and the Asia-Pacific’. International Theory, 2020.
• Zhang, Yongjin. “The Global Diffusion of the English School’.” In Guide to the English School of International Studies, 2014.