___

• Acharya, Amitav. “Advancing Global IR: Challenges, Contentions, and Contributions.” International Studies Review 18, no. 1 (2016): 4–15.
• ———. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 58, no. 4 (2014): 647–59.
• Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan. The Making of Global International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
• ———. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and Beyond Asia. New York: Routledge, 2009.
• ———. “Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction.” In Acharya and Buzan, Non-Western International Relations Theory, 1–25.
• Andrews, Nathan. “International Relations (IR) Pedagogy, Dialogue and Diversity: Taking the IR Course Syllabus Seriously.” All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy & Peace 9, no. 2 (2020): 267–82.
• Aydın, Mustafa, and Cihan Di̇zdaroğlu. “Türkiye’de Uluslararası İlişkiler: Trip 2018 Sonuçları Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme.” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 16, no. 64 (2019): 3–28.
• Aydınlı, Ersel, and Onur Erpul. “The False Promise of Global IR: Exposing the Paradox of Dependent Development.” International Theory (2021): 1–41. doi: 10.1017/S175297192100018X.
• Ayoob, Mohammed. “Inequality and Theorizing in International Relations: The Case for Subaltern Realism.” International Studies Review 4, no. 3 (2002): 27–48.
• Bilgin, Pınar. “How Not to Globalise IR: ‘Centre’ and ‘Periphery’ as Constitutive of ‘the International’.” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 18, no. 70 (2021): 13–27.
• Bilgin, Pınar, and Zeynep Gülşah Çapan. “Introduction to the Special Issue Regional International Relations and Global Worlds: Globalising International Relations.” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 18, no. 70 (2021): 1–11.
• Biltekin, Gonca. “Understanding Turkish Foreign Affairs in the 21st Century: A Homegrown Theorizing Attempt.” Ph.D. dissertation, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2014.
• Blaney, David L, and Tamara A Trownsell. “Recrafting International Relations by Worlding Multiply.” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 18, no. 70 (2021): 45–62.
• Cox, Robert W. Universal Foreigner: The Individual and the World. Singapore: World Scientific, 2013.
• Cox, Robert W. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” Millennium 10, no. 2 (1981): 126–55.
• Escudé, Carlos. “Peripheral Realism: An Argentine Theory-Building Experience, 1986-1997.” In Concepts, Histories and Theories of International Relations for the 21st Century: Regional and National Approaches, edited by José Flávio and Sombra Saraiva. Brasília: IBRI, 2009.
• Friedrichs, Jörg, and Ole Wæver. “Western Europe: Structure and Strategy at the National and Regional Levels.” In Tickner and Wæver, International Relations Scholarship around the World.
• Gelardi, Maiken. “Moving Global IR Forward—a Road Map.” International Studies Review 22, no. 4 (2020): 830–52.
• Goh, Evelyn. “U.S. Dominance and American Bias in International Relations Scholarship: A View from the Outside.” Journal of Global Security Studies 4, no. 3 (2019): 402–10.
• Hagmann, Jonas, and Thomas J. Biersteker. “Beyond the Published Discipline: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of International Studies.” European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 2 (2014): 291–315.
• Hendrix, Cullen, Julia Macdonald, Susan Peterson, Ryan Powers, and Michael J. Tierney. “Beyond IR’s Ivory Tower.” Foreign Policy, September 28, 2020. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/09/28/beyond-international-relations-ivory-tower-academia-policy-engagement-survey/. Herbst, Jeffrey. States and Power in Africa. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.
• Hobson, John M. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760-2010. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
• Hoffmann, Stanley. “An American Social Science: International Relations.” Daedalus 106, no. 3 (1977): 41–60.
• Huang, Xiaoming. “The Invisible Hand: Modern Studies of International Relations in Japan, China, and Korea.” Journal of International Relations and Development 10, no. 2 (2007): 168–203.
• Hurrell, Andrew. “Beyond Critique: How to Study Global IR?”. International Studies Review 18, no. 1 (2016): 149–51.
• Inoguchi, Takashi. “Are There Any Theories of International Relations in Japan?” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7, no. 3 (2007): 369–90.
• Krippendorf, Ekkehart. “The Dominance of American Approaches in International Relations.” Millennium 16, no. 2 (1987): 207–14.
• Kristensen, Peter M. “Revisiting the “American Social Science”—Mapping the Geography of International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 16, no. 3 (2015): 246–69.
• Kristensen, Peter M. “Dividing Discipline: Structures of Communication in International Relations.” International Studies Review 14, no. 1 (2012): 32–50.
• Kuru, Deniz. “Homegrown Theorizing: Knowledge, Scholars, Theory.” All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 7, no. 1 (2018): 69–86.
• Lake, David A. “White Man’s IR: An Intellectual Confession.” Perspectives on Politics 14, no. 4 (2016): 1112–22.
• Mahajan, Sneh. “International Studies in India: Some Comments.” International Studies 47, no. 1 (2010): 59–72.
• Makarychev, Andrey, and Viatcheslav Morozov. “Is “non-Western Theory” Possible? The Idea of Multipolarity and the Trap of Epistemological Relativism in Russian IR.” International Studies Review 15, no. 3 (2013): 328–50.
• Maliniak, Daniel, Susan Peterson, Ryan Powers, and Michael J. Tierney. “Is International Relations a Global Discipline? Hegemony, Insularity, and Diversity in the Field.” Security Studies 27, no. 3 (2018): 448–84.
• Mearsheimer, John J. “Benign Hegemony.” International Studies Review 18, no. 1 (2016): 147–49.
• Milner, Helen, Susan Peterson, Ryan Powers, Michael J. Tiernay, and E. Voeten. “Future of the International Order Survey (Fios).” Princeton University, September 2020. https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/hvmilner/files/survey-report-milner.pdf.
• Powel, Brieg. “Blinkered Learning, Blinkered Theory: How Histories in Textbooks Parochialize IR.” International Studies Review 22, no. 4 (2020): 957–82.
• Qin, Yaqing. “A Relational Theory of World Politics.” International Studies Review 18, no. 1 (2016): 33–47.
• Rathbun, Brian. “Politics and Paradigm Preferences: The Implicit Ideology of International Relations Scholars.” International Studies Quarterly 56, no. 3 (2012): 607–22.
• Ringmar, Erik. “Alternatives to the State: Or, Why a Non-Western IR Must Be a Revolutionary Science.” All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace (2020): 149–62.
• Salter, Mark B. “Edward Said and Post-Colonial International Relations.” In International Relations Theory and Philosophy, edited by Cerwyn Moore and Chris Farrands, 129. London: Routledge, 2010.
• Shani, Giorgio. “Toward a Post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and Critical International Relations Theory.” International Studies Review 10, no. 4 (2008): 722–34.
• Shilliam, Robbie. International Relations and Non-Western Thought: Imperialism, Colonialism and Investigations of Global Modernity. London: Routledge, 2010.
• Smith, Steve. “The Discipline of International Relations: Still an American Social Science?” The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 2, no. 3 (2000): 374-402.
• Tickner, Arlene B. “Core, Periphery and (Neo) Imperialist International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 3 (2013): 627–46.
• Tickner, Arlene B., and Karen Smith. International Relations from the Global South: Worlds of Difference. London: Routledge, 2020.
• Tickner, Arlene B., and Ole Wæver. International Relations Scholarship around the World. London: Routledge, 2009.
• Turton, Helen. International Relations and American Dominance: A Diverse Discipline. New York: Routledge, 2015.
• Voskressenski, Alexei D. Non-Western Theories of International Relations: Conceptualizing World Regional Studies. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
• Wæver, Ole. “The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations.” International organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 687–727.
• Wemheuer-Vogelaar, Wiebke, Nicholas J. Bell, Mariana Navarrete Morales, and Michael J. Tierney. “The IR of the Beholder: Examining Global IR Using the 2014 Trip Survey.” International Studies Review 18, no. 1 (2016): 16–32.
• Xinning, Song. “Building International Relations Theory with Chinese Characteristics.” Journal of Contemporary China 10, no. 26 (2001): 61–74.