___

• Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan. The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at Its Centenary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
• Al-Azm, Sadik J. “The ‘Turkish Model’: A View from Damascus.” Turkish Studies 12, no. 4 (2011): 633–41.
• Alejandro, Audrey. Western Dominance in International Relations? The Internationalization of IR in Brazil and India. Oxon: Routledge, 2019.
• Aras, Bülent, and Hakan Fidan. “Turkey and Eurasia: Frontiers of a New Geographical Imagination.” New Perspectives on Turkey 40 (2009): 193–215.
• Aras, Bülent. “The Davutoğlu Era in Turkish Foreign Policy.” Insight Turkey 11, no. 3 (2009): 127–42.
• Aras, Damla. “Similar Strategies, Dissimilar Outcomes: Appraising of the Efficacy of Turkey’s Coercive Diplomacy with Syria and in Northern Iraq.” Journal of Strategic Studies 34, no. 4 (2011): 587–618.
• Aydınlı, Ersel, and Julie Mathews. “Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory out of Anatolia.” Review of International Studies 34, no. 4 (2008): 693–712.
• Bakir, Ali Husain. “Determinants of the Turkish Position towards the Syrian Crisis: Immediate Dimensions and Future Repercussions.” Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies, June 2011. https://www.dohainstitute.org/ar/lists/ACRPS-PDFDocumentLibrary/document_6BF7FC4E.pdf [in Arabic].
• Başkan, Birol. “Islamism and Turkey’s Foreign Policy during the Arab Spring.” Turkish Studies 19, no. 2 (2018): 264–88.
• Bassin, Mark, Sergey Glebov, and Marlene Laruelle, eds. Between Europe and Asia: The Origins, Theories, and Legacies of Russian Eurasianism. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2015.
• Biersteker, Thomas J. “The Parochialism of Hegemony: Challenges for ‘American’ International Relations.” In International Relations Scholarship around the World, edited by Arlene B. Tickner and Ole Waever, 308–27. Oxon: Routledge, 2009.
• Cagaptay, Soner. Erdogan’s Empire: Turkey and the Politics of the Middle East. New York: I. B. Tauris, 2020.
• Çapan, Zeynep Gülsah, and Ayşe Zarakol. “Turkey’s Ambivalent Self: Ontological Insecurity in ‘Kemalism’ and ‘Erdoğanism’.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32, no. 3 (2019): 263–82.
• Caporaso, James A. “Dependence, Dependency, and Power in the Global System: A Structural and Behavioral Analysis.” International Organization 32, no. 1 (1978): 13–43.
• Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, and Enzo Faletto, Dependencia y Desarrollo en América Latina: Ensayo de Interpretación Sociológica. Sa: Siglo Veintiuno Editores, 1971.
• Davutoglu, Ahmet. Alternative Paradigms: The Impact of Islamic and Western Weltanschauungs on Political Theory. Maryland: University Press of America, 1994.
• –––. Küresel bunalım [Global Angst] İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2002.
• –––. Stratejik derinlik: Türkiye’nin uluslararası konumu [Strategic Depth: Turkey’s International Position] İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2001 . –––. Teoriden pratiğe: Türk dış politikası üzerine konuşmalar [From Theory to Practice: Conversations on Turkish Foreign Policy] İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2011.
• –––. “Turkey’s Foreign Policy Vision: An Assessment of 2007.” Insight Turkey 10, no. 1 (2008): 77–96.
• Demir, Imran. Overconfidence and Risk Taking in Foreign Policy Decision Making: The Case of Turkey’s Syria Policy. Cham: Routledge, 2017.
• Duvall, Raymond D. “Dependence and Dependencia Theory: Notes toward Precision of Concept and Argument.” International Organization 32, no. 1 (1978): 51–78.
• Ersoy, Eyüp. “Conceptual Cultivation and Homegrown Theorizing: The case of/for the Concept of Influence.” In Widening the World of International Relations: Homegrown Theorizing, edited by Ersel Aydınlı and Gonca Biltekin, 204–25. Oxon: Routledge, 2018.
• Fisher Onar, Nora. “‘Democratic Depth’: The Missing Ingredient in Turkey’s Domestic/Foreign Policy Nexus?” In Another Empire? A Decade of Turkey’s Foreign Policy under the Justice and Development Party, edited by Kerem Öktem, Ayşe Kadıoğlu, and Mehmet Karlı, 61–75. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi University Press, 2009.
• Fravel, M. Taylor. “China’s Search for Military Power.” Washington Quarterly 31, no. 3 (2008): 125–41.
• Golmohammadi, Vali, Sayyed Muhammad-Kazem Sajjadpour, and Massoud Mousavi Shefaee. "Erdoganism and Understanding Turkey’s Middle East Policy.” Strategic Studies Quarterly 19, no. 3 (2016): 69–92.[in Persian]
• Gözaydın, İştar. “Ahmet Davutoğlu: Role as an Islamic Scholar Shaping Turkey’s Foreign Policy. ” In International Relations and Islam: Diverse Perspectives, edited by Nassef Manabilang Adiong, 91–109. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2013.
• Groc, Gérard. “La doctrine Davutoglu: une projection diplomatique de la Turquie sur son environnement [Davutoglu Doctrine: Turkey’s Diplomatic Projection on Its Environment].” Confluences Méditerranée no. 83 (2012): 71–85.
• Gürzel, Aylin, and Eyüp Ersoy. “From Regionalism to Realpolitik: The Rise and Fall of Turkey as a Middle Power in the Middle East.” in Middle Powers in Asia and Europe in the 21st Century, edited by Giampiero Giacomello and Bertjan Verbeek, 119–36. Maryland: Lexington Books, 2020.
• Han, Ahmet K. “Paradise Lost: A Neoclassical Realist Analysis of Turkish Foreign Policy and the Case of Turkish-Syrian Relations.” In Turkey-Syria Relations: Between Enmity and Amity, edited by Raymond Hinnebusch and Özlem Tür, 55–69. Oxon: Routledge, 2013.
• Hashmetzadeh, Muhammad Baker, Hamidreza Hamidfar, and Yasir Gaimee. “Strategy of Iran and Turkey in Crisis Management in the Region of West Asia: Case Study of the Syrian Crisis.” Journal of Politics and International Relations 4, no. 8 (2020-2021): 29–49.[in Persian]
• Hellmann, Gunther, and Morten Valbjørn. “Problematizing Global Challenges: Recalibrating the ‘Inter’ in IR-Theory.” International Studies Review 19, no. 2 (2017): 279–309.
• Ho, Tze Ern. “The Relational-Turn in International Relations Theory: Bringing Chinese Ideas into Mainstream International Relations Scholarship.” American Journal of Chinese Studies 26, no. 2 (2019): 91–106.
• Hoffmann, Stanley. “An American Social Science: International Relations.” Daedalus 106, no. 3 (1977): 41–60.
• İnalcik, Halil. The Ottoman Empire: The Classical Age 1300-1600. London: Phoenix, 1973.
• Jabbour, Jana. “Le retour de la Turquie en Méditerranée: La ‘profondeur stratégique’ Turque en Méditerranée pré- et post-printemps Arabe [Turkey’s Return to the Mediterranean: Turkish ‘Strategic Depth’ in the Mediterranean Pre- and Post-Arab Spring].” Cahiers de la Méditerranée no. 89 (2014): 45–56.
• Kalın, İbrahim. “Debating Turkey in the Middle East: The Dawn of a New Geo-Political Imagination.” Insight Turkey 11, no. 1 (2009): 83–96.
• –––.“Turkish Foreign Policy: Framework, Values, and Mechanisms.” International Journal 6, no. 1 (2011-2012): 7–21.
• –––. “Türk dış politikası ve kamu diplomasisi.” In MUSIAD araştırma raporları: yükselen değer Türkiye, edited by Ali Resul Usul, 49–65. İstanbul: Mavi Ofset, 2010.
• Kınıkloğlu, Suat. “Turkey’s Neighbourhood and Beyond: Tectonic Transformation at Work?” International Spectator 45, no. 4 (2010): 93–100.
• Kıvanç, Ümit. Pan-İslamcının macera kılavuzu: Davutoğlu ne diyor, bir şey diyor mu? [Pan-Islamist’s Guide of Adventure: What is Davutoğlu Saying, Is he Saying Anything?] İstanbul: Birikim Yayınları, 2015.
• Kacowicz, Arie M., and Daniel F. Wajner, “Alternative World Orders in an Age of Globalization: Latin American Scenarios and Responses.” In Latin America in Global International Relations, edited by Amitav Acharya, Melisa Deciancio, and Diana Tussie, 11–30. Oxon: Routledge, 2022.
• Köse, Talha, Ahmet Okumuş, and Burhanettin Duran, eds. Stratejik zihniyet: kuramdan eyleme Ahmet Davutoğlu ve stratejik derinlik [Strategic Mindset: Ahmet Davutoğlu from Theory to Practice and Strategic Depth] İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2014.
• Kösebalaban, Hasan. “Torn Identities and Foreign Policy: The Case of Japan and Turkey.” Insight Turkey 10, no. 1 (2008): 5–30.
• –––. “Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy towards Syria.” Middle East Critique 29, no. 3 (2020): 335–44.
• –––. Turkish Foreign Policy: Islam, Nationalism, and Globalization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
• Kristensen, Peter Marcus. “The BRICs and Knowledge Production in International Relations,” in The International Political Economy of the BRICs, edited by Li Xing, 18–36. Oxon: Routledge, 2019.
• Larrabee, F. Stephen. “Turkey’s New Geopolitics.” Survival 52, no. 2 (2010): 157–80.
• Mäkinen, Sirke. “Professional Geopolitics as an Ideal: Roles of Geopolitics in Russia.” International Studies Perspectives 18, no. 3 (2017): 288–03.
• Meininghaus, Esther, and Carina Schlüsing. “War in Syria: The Translocal Dimension of Fighter Mobilization.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 31, no. 3 (2020): 475–510.
• Meral, Ziya, and Jonathan Paris. “Decoding Turkish Foreign Policy Hyperactivity.” The Washington Quarterly 33, no. 4 (2010): 75–86.
• Murinson, Alexander. “The Strategic Depth Doctrine of Turkish Foreign Policy.” Middle Eastern Studies 42, no. 6 (2006): 945–64.
• Nordin, Astrid H. M., Graham M. Smith, Raoul Bunskoek, Chiung-chiu Huang, Yih-jye (Jay) Hwang, Patrick Thaddeus Jackson, Emilian Kavalski, L. H. M. Ling, Leigh Martindale, Mari Nakamura, Daniel Nexon, Laura Premack, Yaqing Qin, Chih-yu Shih, David Tyfield, Emma Williams & Marysia Zalewski “Towards Global Relational Theorizing: A Dialogue between Sinophone and Anglophone Scholarship on Relationalism.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32, no. 5 (2019): 570–81.
• Noureddin, Muhammed. “تركيا والثورات العربية: سياسات ‘مركبة ‘ تنهي ‘العمق الإستراتيجي” [Turkey and the Arab Revolutions: ‘Composite’ Policies Putting an End to ‘the Strategic Depth].” عربية شؤون [Arab Affairs] no. 146 (2011): 77–87.
• Önhon, Ömer. Büyükelçinin gözünden Suriye [Syria through the Eyes of the Ambassador]. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 2021.
• Öniş, Ziya. “Sharing Power: Turkey’s Democratization Challenge in the Age of the AKP Hegemony.” Insight Turkey 15, no. 2 (2013): 103–22.
• Öniş, Ziya, and Şuhnaz Yilmaz. “Between Europeanization and Euro‐Asianism: Foreign Policy Activism in Turkey during the AKP Era.” Turkish Studies 10, no. 1 (2009): 7–24.
• Ozkan, Behlül. “Turkey, Davutoglu and the Idea of Pan-Islamism.” Survival 56, no. 4 (2014): 119–40.
• Ozkececi-Taner, Binnur. “Disintegration of the ‘Strategic Depth’ Doctrine and Turkey’s Troubles in the Middle East.” Contemporary Islam 11 (2017): 201–14.
• Park, Bill. “Turkey’s ‘New’ Foreign Policy: Newly Influential or Just Over-active?” Mediterranean Politics 19, no. 2 (2014): 161–64.
• Pope, Hugh. “Pax Ottomana? The Mixed Success of Turkey’s New Foreign Policy.” Foreign Affairs 89, no. 6 (2010): 161–71.
• Qin, Yaqing. “A Multiverse of Knowledge: Cultures and IR Theories.” Chinese Journal of International Politics 11, no. 4 (2018): 415–34.
• –––. A Relational Theory of World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
• Saleh, Yasin Al-Haj. “The New Turkey is not a Revived Ottoman [State].” Journal of Palestine Studies no. 85 (2011): 149–57.
• Shaw, Stanford. History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
• Sözen, Ahmet. “A Paradigm Shift in Turkish Foreign Policy: Transition and Challenges.” Turkish Studies 11, no. 1 (2010):103–23.
• Stein, Aaron. “I. Introduction: The Search for Strategic Depth-The AKP and the Middle East.” Whitehall Papers 83, no. 1 (2014): 1–10.
• Taşpınar, Ömer. “Turkey’s Strategic Vision and Syria.” The Washington Quarterly 35, no. 3 (2012): 127–40.
• Tayla, Alican. “Un nouveau paradigme pour la Turquie? [A New Paradigm for Turkey?]” Confluences Méditerranée no. 79 (2011): 57–65.
• Tickner, Arlene B. “Core, Periphery and (Neo)Imperialist International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 3 (2013): 627–46.
• –––. “Hearing Latin American Voices in International Relations Studies.” International Studies Perspectives 4, no. 4 (2003): 325–50.
• Tickner, Arlene B., and Karen Smith, eds., International Relations from the Global South: Worlds of Difference. Oxon: Routledge, 2020.
• Tuathail, Gearóid Ó, and John Agnew. “Geopolitics and Discourse: Practical Geopolitical Reasoning in American Foreign Policy.” Political Geography 11, no. 2 (1992):190–204.
• Tuğtan, Mehmet Ali. “Kültürel değişkenlerin dış politikadaki yeri: İsmail Cem ve Ahmet Davutoğlu [The Place of Cultural Variables in Foreign Policy: İsmail Cem and Ahmet Davutoğlu].” Uluslararası İlişkiler 13, no. 49 (2016): 3–24.
• Türkeş, Mustafa. “Decomposing Neo-Ottoman Hegemony.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 18, no. 3 (2016): 191–216.
• Waldman, Simon A., and Emre Caliskan, The ‘New Turkey’ and Its Discontents. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
• Walker, Joshua W. “Learning Strategic Depth: Implications of Turkey’s New Foreign Policy Doctrine.” Insight Turkey 9, no. 3 (2007): 32–47.
• Yalçın, Hasan Basri. “Stratejik derinlik ve karmaşık nedensellik ağı [Strategic Depth and Complex Causality Network].” In Stratejik zihniyet: kuramdan eyleme Ahmet Davutoğlu ve stratejik derinlik [Strategic Mindset: Ahmet Davutoğlu from Theory to Practice and Strategic Depth], edited by Talha Köse, Ahmet Okumuş, and Burhanettin Duran, 147–86. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2014.
• Yalvaç, Faruk. “Strategic Depth or Hegemonic Depth? A Critical Realist Analysis of Turkey’s Position in the World System.” International Relations 26, no. 2 (2012): 165–80.
• Yanık, Lerna K. “Constructing Turkish ‘Exceptionalism’: Discourses of Liminality and Hybridity in Post-Cold War Turkish Foreign Policy.” Political Geography 30, no. 2 (2011): 80–9.
• Yavuz, M. Hakan. Nostalgia for the Empire: The Politics of Neo-Ottomanism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.
• Yeşiltaş, Murat. “The Transformation of the Geopolitical Vision in Turkish Foreign Policy.” Turkish Studies 14, no. 4 (2013): 661–87.