The Relationship Between Information and Communication Technology (ICT), International Migration and Economic Growth in Turkey

The paper examines the information and communication technology-international migration-economic growth nexus for Turkish economy using annual time series data covering the period of (1998-2019). Toda-Yamamoto Causality Test (TY) was used in the application of econometric method The results obtained indicated that there is a unidirectional causality from international migration to economic growth in the long run for Turkey. This is inline with the empirical evidences that external immigrant movements can promote economic growth in receiving country. Although the form of migration to Turkey is unclear in terms of skilled or unqualified labor force, international migrants, even including daytripper workers from neighbour countries, boost the economic activities especially in agriculture, construction and service sectors in Turkey. The paper also concluded that there is a one-way causal relationship between ICT and economic growth. The ICT usage can make a substantial contribution to economic growth of Turkey so Turkish government should improve the infrastructure of Internet and mobile phone with a conscious policy initiative. Besides, lastly, it is observed that there is not a causal relationship between migration and ICT at 5 % for Turkey. It’s found that there is a unidirectional causality from migration to ICT at 10 %.

The Relationship Between Information and Communication Technology (ICT), International Migration and Economic Growth in Turkey

The paper examines the information and communication technology-international migration-economic growth nexus for Turkish economy using annual time series data covering the period of (1998-2019). Toda-Yamamoto Causality Test (TY) was used in the application of econometric method The results obtained indicated that there is a unidirectional causality from international migration to economic growth in the long run for Turkey. This is inline with the empirical evidences that external immigrant movements can promote economic growth in receiving country. Although the form of migration to Turkey is unclear in terms of skilled or unqualified labor force, international migrants, even including daytripper workers from neighbour countries, boost the economic activities especially in agriculture, construction and service sectors in Turkey. The paper also concluded that there is a one-way causal relationship between ICT and economic growth. The ICT usage can make a substantial contribution to economic growth of Turkey so Turkish government should improve the infrastructure of Internet and mobile phone with a conscious policy initiative. Besides, lastly, it is observed that there is not a causal relationship between migration and ICT at 5 % for Turkey. It’s found that there is a unidirectional causality from migration to ICT at 10 %.

___

  • ADELEYE, N. & EBOAGU, C. (2019). “Evaluation of ICT Development and Economic Growth in Africa”, Netnomics, 20: 31-53.
  • ALGAN, N., ÖZMEN, M. & KARLILAR, S. (2017). “Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojilerinin Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerine Etkisi: G-20 Ülkeleri İçin Bir Analiz”, Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1): 1-24.
  • ALTUNÇ, Ö.F., UÇAN, O. & AKYILDIZ, A. (2017). “Dış Göçlerin Türkiye Ekonomisinde İşsizlik, Enflasyon ve Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerine Etkileri: Ekonometrik Bir Analiz”, Researcher Social Science Studies, 5(8) : 197-212.
  • BANQUE DE FRANCE (2016). “Contribution of Information and Communication Technologies to Growth”, No. 22: 1-5.
  • BILAN, Y., MISHCHUK, H., SAMOLIUK, N. & GRİSHNOVA, O. (2019). “ICT and Economic Growth: Links and Possibilities of Engaging”, Intellectual Economics, 13(1): 1-12.
  • BOUBTANE, E., DUMONT, J.C. & RAULT, C. (2014). “Immigration and Economic Growth in the OECD Countries”, IZA Discussion Paper Series, Working Paper No:8681.
  • CASTELLS, M. (2004).The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • COOKE, T. & SHUTTLEWORTH, I. (2017). “Migration and the Internet”. Migration Letters, 14(3) : 331-342.
  • GÖÇER, İ. & AKIN, T. (2016). “Kırılgan Beşlide Tasarruf-Yatırım Açığının Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkileri: Yeni Nesil Bir Ekonometrik Analiz”. Ege Akademik Bakış, 16(2) : 197-210.
  • GUJARATİ, D. N. & PORTER, D.C. (2014). Temel Ekonometri, İstanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık.
  • HONG, J. (2017). “Causal Relationship Between ICT R&D Investment and Economic Growth in Korea”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 116: 70-75.
  • HÜBLER, M. (2016). “Does Migration Support Technology Diffusion in Developing Countries?”,World Development, 83: 148-162.
  • IQBAL, K., PENG, H., HAFEEZ, M. & KHURSHAİD (2020). “Analyzing the Effect of ICT on Migration and Economic Growth in Belt and Road Countries”, Journal of International Migration and Integration, 21: 307-318.
  • KOTYRLO, E. (2019). “Impact of Modern Information and Communication Tools on International Migration”, International Migration, 58(4): 195-213.
  • LEE, J.W. & BRAHMASRENE, T. (2014). “ICT, CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth: Evidence from A Panel of ASEAN”, Global Economic Review: Perspectives on East Asian Economies and Industries, 43(2): 93-109.
  • LUCAS, R.E. (1990). “Why Doesn’t Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries?”, The American Economic Review, 80(2): 92-96.
  • MAJEED, M.T & AYUB, T. (2018). “ICT and Economic Growth Nexus: A Comparative Global Analysis”, Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 12(2): 443-476.
  • MALATYALI, Ö. (2016). “Teknoloji Transferinin Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerine Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği”, Kastamonu Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 13: 62-73.
  • MARIA, C.D. & LAZAROVA, E.A. (2012). “Migration, Human Capital Formation and Growth: An Empirical Investigation”, World Development, 40(5): 938-955.
  • NEDELCU, M. & SOYSÜREN, İ. (2020). “Precarious Migrants, Migration Regimes and Digital Tecnologies: The Empowerment-Control Nexus”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1-17.
  • NIEBEL, T. (2018). “ICT and Economic Growth-Comparing, Developing, Emerging and Developed Countries”, World Development, 197-211.
  • OİARZABAL, P.J. & REIPS, U. (2012). “Migration and Diaspora in the Age of Information and Communication Technologies”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(9): 1333-1338.
  • ONITSUKA, K. & HIDAYAT, R.T (2018). “Does ICT Facilitate or Impede Rural Youth Migration in Indonesia?”, The 9th International Conference of Rural Research and Planning Group, July 6-8, 2018, 34-43.
  • ÖZKAN, G. & ÇELİK, H. (2018). “Bilgi İletişim Teknolojileri ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: Türkiye İçin Bir Uygulama”, Uluslararası Ticaret ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1): 1-15.
  • PRADHAN, R.P., MALLİK, G. & BAGCHİ, T.P. (2018). “ICT Infrastructure and Economic Growth: A Causality Evinced By Cross-Country Panel Data”, IIMB Management Review, 30: 91-103.
  • ROHMAN, I.K. & BOHLİN, E. (2014). “Decomposition Analysis of the Telecommunications Sector in Indonesia: What Does the Cellular Era Shed Light On?”, Telecommunications Policy, 38(3) : 248-263.
  • ROMER, P.M. (1986). “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 94(5): 1002-1037.
  • SRİDHAR, K.S. & SRİDHAR, V. (2009). “Telecommunications Infrastructure and Economic Growth: Evidence from Developing Countries”, Applied Econometrics and International Development, 2: 91-116.
  • STEINMUELLER, W.E. (2001). “ICTs and The Possibilities for Leapfrogging by Developing Countries”, International Labour Review, 140(2): 193-210.
  • TODA, H.Y & YAMAMOTO, T. (1995). “Statistical Inference in Vector Auto Regressions with Possibly Integrated Process”, Journal of Econometrics, 66: 225-250.
  • TÜREDİ, S. (2013). “Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojilerinin Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisi: Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler İçin Panel Veri Analizi”, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Elektronik Dergisi, 7: 298-322.
  • YAPRAKLI, S. & SAĞLAM, T. (2010). “Türkiye’de Bilgi İletişim Teknolojileri ve Ekonomik Büyüme: Ekonomterik Bir Analiz 1980-2008”, Ege Akademik Bakış, 10(2): 575-596.
  • UN (2019). United Nations International Migrant Stock 2019.