Aslı ÇETİNKAYA YAPRAK, Emine Hazal AKTAŞ

YouTube Videolarının Retina Dekolmanı Hakkındaki İçerik Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesi

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, retina dekolmanı ile ilgili YouTube videolarının kalitesi, güvenilirliği ve etkinliği değerlendirdi. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Retina dekolmanı anahtar kelimesi kullanılarak YouTube'da çevrimiçi bir arama yapıldı ve ilk 100 video çalışmaya dahil edildi. Tüm videolar, beğeni, beğenmeme, yorum, görüntüleme, günlük görüntüleme oranı, yüklenen kaynak (klinisyenler, kamu/özel kurum, veya sağlık kanalı), yüklendiği ülke, video türü (hasta deneyimi, bilimsel, bilgi içerikli) ve içerik (klinik, tedavi veya her ikisi) olarak değerlendirildi, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), DISCERN, küresel kalite (KKS) ve kullanışlılık puanları iki bağımsız oftalmolog tarafından değerlendirildi. Bulgular: İlk 100 videonun 88 videosu kriterleri karşıladı. Ortalama DISCERN, JAMA, KKS ve kullanışlılık puanı sırasıyla 44,1 ± 14, 1,66 ± 0,58, 2,81 ± 0,93 ve 2,05 ± 1,24 idi. Elli iki (%59,1) video hekimler tarafından, 36 video (%40,9) hekim olmayanlar tarafından yüklenmişti. Korelasyon analizinde tüm puanlama sistemleri birbirleri ile anlamlı ve güçlü pozitif korelasyon gösterdi (p

Quality Assessment Of Information On Retinal Detachment On YouTube Videos

Objective: This study evaluated the quality, reliability and effectiveness of YouTube videos addressing retinal detachment. Material and Methods: An online search of YouTube was performed using the keyword retinal detachment and the first 100 videos were included in the study.All videos were evaluated in terms of like and dislike numbers, comments, views, daily viewing rates, uploading sources (physicians, public/private institu- tion, or health channel), country of origin, video type (patient experience, scholarly information), and contents (clinic, treatment or both of them), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), DISCERN, global quality (GQS) and usefulness scores by two independent ophthalmologists. Results: Eighty eight videos of the top 100 videos met the criteria. The mean DISCERN, JAMA, GQS and usefulness score were 44.81 ± 14, 1.66 ± 0.58, 2.81 ± 0.93 and 2.05 ± 1.24, respec- tively. 52 (59.1%) videos were uploded by physicians and 36 (40.9%) videos were uploded by non-physicians. In the correlation analysis,all the scoring systems showed a signifi- cant and strong positive correlation with each other (p

PDF

___

1. Steinberg RH, Wood I. Pigment epithelial cell ensheathment of cone outer segments in the retina of the domestic cat. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1974;187:461-478.
2. Yanoff M, Duker JJ. Ophthalmology. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 2004:982–989.
3. Kanski JK. Clinical ophthalmology. Edinburgh, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2003:349–388.
4. Amer R, Nalcı H, Yalçındağ N. Exudative retinal detachment. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017;62:723-769.
5. Yanoff M, Duker JJ. Ophthalmology. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 2004:990.
6. Ghazi NG, Green WR. Pathology and pathogenesis of retinal detachment. Eye (Lond). 2002;16:411-421.
7. Go SL, Hoyng CB, Klaver CC. Genetic risk of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a familial aggregation study. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1237-1241.
8. Polkinghorne PJ, Craig JP. Northern New Zealand rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study: epidemiology and risk factors. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2004;32:159-163.
9. Abouzeid H, Wolfensberger TJ. Macular recovery after retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006;84:597-605.
10. Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43:E1334-E1339.
11. Singh SK, Liu S, Capasso R, Kern RC, Gouveia CJ. YouTube as a source of information for obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Otolaryngol. 2018;39:378-382.
12. Morahan-Martin JM. How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: a cross-cultural review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004;7:497-510.
13. Allam A, Schulz PJ, Krauthammer M. Toward automated assessment of health Web page quality using the DISCERN instrument. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24:481-487.
14. Gokcen HB, Gumussuyu G. A quality analysis of disc herniation videos on YouTube. World Neurosurg. 2019;124:e799–e804.
15. Ranade AS, Belthur MV, Oka GA, Malone JD. YouTube as an information source for clubfoot: a quality analysis of video content. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2020;29:375– 378.
16. Altunel O, Sirakaya E. Evaluation of YouTube videos as sources of information about multifocal intraocular lens. Semin Ophthalmol. 2021;18:1-5.
17. Kalayci M, Cetinkaya E, Suren E, Yigit K, Erol MK. Are YouTube Videos Useful in Informing Patients about Keratoplasty? Semin Ophthalmol. 2021;22:1-6.
18. Lim Fat MJ, Doja A, Barrowman N, et al. YouTube videos as a teaching tool and patient resource for infantile spasms. J Child Neurol. 2011;26:804–809.
19. Sood A, Sarangi S, Pandey A, et al. YouTube as a source of information on kidney stone disease. Urology. 2011;77:558–562.
20. Mangan MS, Cakir A, Yurttaser Ocak S, Tekcan H, Balci S, Ozcelik Kose A. Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube. Strabismus. 2020;28:175-180.
21. Bora K, Das D, Barman B, Borah P. Are internet videos useful sources of information during global public health emergencies? A case study of YouTube videos during the 2015-16 Zika virus pandemic. Pathog Glob Health. 2018;112:320-328.
22. Kocyigit BF, Akaltun MS, Sahin AR. YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19 and rheumatic disease link. Clin Rheumatol. 2020;39:2049-2054.
23. Gabarron E, Fernandez-Luque L, Armayones M, Lau AY. Identifying Measures Used for Assessing Quality of YouTube Videos with Patient Health Information: A Review of Current Literature. Interact J Med Res. 2013;2(1):e6.