Beşerî Sermaye ve Dijitalin Tematik Dönüşümü: WoS Tabanlı Bir Bibliyometrik Analiz

Amaç: Bu makale beşerî sermaye ve dijital alanda küresel çapta yapılan çalışmaların literatürünü analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Tasarım/Yöntem: 1998'ten 2022'e kadar olan çalışmalarda bibliometrik için R-Studio’nun arayüzü uygulama olan “biblioshiny” kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Araştırmacıların daha fazla ilgi gösterdiği konu alanları dijital, insan, sermaye, ekonomi, dijitalleşme, teknoloji, eğitim gibi alanlarda olmaktadır. Anahtar kelimelerin sıralamasına bakıldığında dijital ekonomi, dijitalleşme, dijital dönüşüm, entelektüel sermaye, dijital bölünme, dijital teknolojiler, inovasyon, eğitim gibi kelimeler yer almaktadır. Kitap, dergi makalesi ve konferans bildirisi gibi alanlarda en fazla yayın üreten ülkenin Rusya olduğu görülmüştür. En çok yayın yapan yazarlar arasında listenin ilk sırasında Kelchevskaya NR. ve Stepan Zemtsov yer almaktadır. En çok atıf alan makale Laar vd., 2017 “The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review” başlıklı makalesidir. Beşerî sermaye ve dijital alanda en çok yayın yapan dergi Sustainability dergisidir. Sınırlılıklar: Bu makale, 1998'ten 2022'e kadar Clarivate Analytics WoS veri tabanında iki anahtar kelime (“human capital” ve “digital”) üzerine analiz yapılmıştır. Özgünlük/Değer: Söz konusu çalışma diğer yapılan çalışmalardan farklı olarak beşerî sermayenin teknolojide yaşanan evrimin içerisinde tutunabilmesi, var olabilmesi ve değişime adaptasyonu için dijital alanla ilişkisini içermektedir. Bu farklılık çalışmayı diğerlerinden ayırarak özgün perspektif kazandırmaktadır.

Thematic transformation of Human Capital and Digital: A WoS Based Bibliometric Analysis

Purpose: This article aims to analyze the literature of global studies in the field of human capital and digital. Design/Methodology: In the study from 1998 to 2022, R-Studio's interface application "biblioshiny" was used for bibliometrics. Findings: The subject areas that researchers are more interested in are digital, human, capital, economy, digitalization, technology, education. Looking at the order of the keywords, there are words such as digital economy, digitalization, digital transformation, intellectual capital, digital division, digital technologies, innovation, education.. It has been observed that the country that produces the most publications such as books, journal articles and conference papers is Russia. Kelchevskaya NR and Stepan Zemtsov are at the top of the list among the most issuing authors. The most cited article is Laar et al., 2017 titled “The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review”. The journal that publishes the most in the field of human capital and digital is Sustainability. Limitations: This article analyzed two keywords (“human capital” and “digital”) in theClarivate Analytics WoS database from 1998 to 2022. Originality/Value: The aforementioned study, unlike other studies, includes the relationship of human capital with the digital field in order to be able to hold on to the evolution in technology, to exist and to adapt to change. This difference distinguishes the work from others and gives it a unique perspective.

___

  • Alina-Andreea, M. N. (2020). The Impact Of The Digital Society On Human Capital. Junior Scientific Researcher, 6(1), 15-24. https://ideas.repec.org/a/jsr/journl/v6y2020i1p15-24.html
  • Aynacı, C. (2022). Sosyal sermayenin akademik yolculuğu: “YÖK-Tez” örnekleminde bibliyometrik bir analiz. PESA International Journal of Social Studies, 8, 42–57. https://doi.org/10.25272/j.2149-8385.2022.8.1.04
  • Becker, G. (1993). Human capital a theoretical and empricial analysis with special referance to education (3nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001
  • Bilen, M. & Yumuşak, İ.G. (2008). Gary S. Becker’in iktisat bilimine ve beşeri sermaye teorisine katkıları. The Journal of Knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management, Volume III Spring. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/40504
  • Bonilla, A. C. &. Merigó, José M & Carolina, T. A. (2015). Economics in Latin America: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 105, 1239–1252. DOI:10.1007/s11192-015-1747-7
  • Bouchard, L. & Albertini, M. & Batista, R. & Montigny, J. (2015). Research on health inequalities: A bibliometric analysis (1966–2014). Social Science & Medicine, 141,100-108. DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.022
  • Carkhuff, R. R. (2000). Human Possibilities Human Capital in the 21st Century (1nd ed.). ‎ Human Resource Development Press.
  • Cengiz, H. & Çetinceli, K. (2020). Türkiye ve Brıcs ülkelerinin bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri gelişmişlik endeksleri ile lojistik performans endekslerinin karşılaştırılması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 38, 165-185. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sbe/issue/58152/822724
  • Chinn, M. D. & Fairlie, R. W. (2004, Eylül). The determinants of the global digital divide: a cross-country analysis of computer and ınternet penetration. Oxford Economic Papers, 59, 1-28. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/20571/1/dp1305.pdf
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780243
  • Crane, D. (1988). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. University of Chicago Press.
  • Daim, T. U. & Rueda, G. & Martin, H. & Gerdsri, P. (2006). Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 73(8), 981–1012. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040162506001168
  • Diaby, V. & Campbell, K. & Goeree, R. (2013). Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: A bibliometric analysis. Operations Research for Health Care, 2(1–2), 20-24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211692313000027
  • Goldin, C. (2016). Handbook of Cliometrics. Claude Diebolt and Michael Haupert (Ed) Springer-Verlag, Forthcoming Human Capital Department of Economics Harvard University and National Bureau of Economic Research. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/goldin/files/human_capital_handbook_of_cliometrics_0.pdf
  • Derviş, H. (2019). Bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix an R package. Journal of Scientometric Research, 8(3), 156-160. https://www.jscires.org/article/326
  • DiMaggio, P. & Bonikowski, B. (2008). Make money surfing the web? the impact of ınternet use on the earnings of U.S. workers. American Sociological Review, 73, 227-250. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/000312240807300203
  • Donthua, N. & Kumar, S. & Pattnaik, D. (2020). Forty-five years of Journal of Business Research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 1-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.039
  • Fagerberg, J. & Fosaas, M. & Sapprasert, K. (2012). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1132-115. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.008
  • Garrigos, S. Fernando, J., & Botella, C. Dolares, M., & Gonzalez, C. Thomas, F. (2018). Social capital, human capital, and sustainability: a bibliometric and visualization analysis. Sustainability, 10(12), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124751
  • Ghi, T.N. & Thu, N.Q. & Huan, N.Q. & Trung, N.T. (2022). Human capital, digital transformation, and firm performance of startups in Vietnam. Management, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/manment-2019-0081
  • Gu, Y. (2004). Global knowledge management research: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 61, 171–190.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000041647.01086.f4
  • Guo, Y. & Hao, Z. & Zhao, S. & Gong, J. & Yang , F. (2020). Artificial intelligence in health care: bibliometric analysis. Journal of Medical İnternet Research, 22, 7. DOI: 10.2196/18228
  • Güzeller, C. O. & Çeliker, N. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of tourism research for the period 2007-2016. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research, 6(1), 1-22 DOI: 10.30519/ahtr.446248
  • Hota, P. K. & Subramanian, B. & Narayanamurthy, G. (2020). Mapping the intellectual structure of social entrepreneurship research: A citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 166, 89–114. DOI:10.1007/S10551-019-04129-4
  • Huo, A. (2017). Bibliometric study of specific human capital based on the CNKI series data analysis from 2000 to 2014. Advances in Computer Science Research, 70-79. https://doi.org/10.2991/mcei-17.2017.16
  • Kanberoğlu, Z. Y. & Yıldırımçakar, H. İ. (2021, Mayıs). Beşerî sermaye piyasasının gelişiminde dijital ekonominin rolü. Sosyal Bilimlerde Uluslararası Dijital Dönüşüm Konferansı Tam Metin Bildiri Kitabı, Beykent Üniversitesi Yayınları, 169, 2-4.
  • Kasavan, S. & Yusoff, S. & Guan, N. C. & Zaman, N. S. K. & Fakri, M. F. R. (2021). Global trends of textile waste research from 2005 to 2020 using bibliometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(33), 44780-44794. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-15303-5
  • Korupp, S. E. & Szydlik, M. (2005). Causes and trends of the digital divide. European Sociological Review, 21(4), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jci030
  • Kumar, S. & Pandey, N. & Mukherjee, D. (2021). Cross Cultural and Strategic Management: a retrospective overview using bibliometric analysis. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 9, 1. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CCSM-08-2021-0147/full/html)
  • Laar, E. & Deursen, J. A. M. Alexander & Dijk, A. G. M. Jan & Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
  • Lamotte, D. (2012, Nisan). Human capital a driving force for business growth, director. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---ilo-suva/documents/publication/wcms_192340.pdf
  • Li, L. (2018). China's manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of “Made-in-China 2025” and “Industry 4.0”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 66-74 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.028
  • Lio, M. & Liu, M. (2006). ICT and agricultural productivity: evidence from cross-country data. Agricultural Economics, 34(3), 221-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0864.2006.00120.x
  • McCain, K.W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433-443. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<433::AID-ASI11>3.0.CO;2-Q
  • Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University. (2022, May 22). About us. https://english.spbstu.ru/university/
  • Pitt, C. & Goodman, C. & Hanson, K. (2016). Economic evaluation in global perspective: a bibliometric analysis of the recent literature. Health Economics, 25(1), 9-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3305
  • POLYTECH. (2022, Şubat). About Us. https://english.spbstu.ru/university/
  • Popkova, E. G. & Sergi, B. S. (2020). Human capital and AI in industry 4.0. convergence and divergence in social entrepreneurship in Russia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(4), 565-581. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JIC-09-2019-0224/full/html
  • PwC. (2022, Kasım). Will robots really steal our jobs? https://www.pwc.co.uk/economics
  • OECD. (2016a). New Markets And New Jobs Background Report. Dıgıtal Economy Papers (No. 255). https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5jlwt496h37l-en.pdf? expires=1668074354&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=29476C9B7A3568A339EB2CD351DA3D11
  • OECD. (2016b). Skılls For A Dıgıtal World 2016. Dıgıtal Economy Papers (No. 250). Ministerial Meeting On The Digital Economy Background Report. https://www.oecd.org/els/emp/Skills-for-a-Digital-World.pdf
  • Quintero, Q. W. & Blanco, A. Ana, B., & Garzón, C. Manuel, A. (2021). Intellectual capital: a review and bibliometric analysis. Publications, 9(4), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9040046
  • Saxton, V. Chairman J. (2000, Şubat). İnvestment ın educatıon: prıvate and publıc returns. Joint Economic Committee United States Congress. https://www.house.gov/jec/
  • Shang, T. & Miao, X. & Abdul, W. (2019). A historical review and bibliometric analysis of disruptive innovation 2019. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11, 2. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJIS-05-2018-0056/full/html
  • Sun, Y. & Grimes, S. (2016). The emerging dynamic structure of national innovation studies: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 17–40. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-015-1778-0
  • Sutherland, I. & Kiatkawsin K. (2020). Determinants of guest experience in airbnb: a topic modeling approach using LDA. Sustainability, 12(8), 3402-3418. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083402
  • Tahai, A. & Meyer, M.J. (1999). A revealed preference study of management journals' direct influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20(3), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199903)20:3<279::AID-SMJ33>3.0.CO;2-2
  • Tunçay, S., S. & Özer, P.S., & Tozkoparan, G. (2015). Öz yerel yazında sosyal sermaye araştırmaları: odaklar ve boşlukların sosyal ağ analizi ile incelenmesi. İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 16 (2), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.268163
  • United Nations. (2020, Temmuz). E-Government Survey 2020. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2020
  • Vaio, A. D. & Hassan, R. & Palladino, R. (2021, Aralık). Digital innovation and disruptive technologies in the "intellectual capital (IC) and knowledge management systems (KMS) disclosure": a bibliometric analysis. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD), 1-7. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9380581
  • World Bank. (2019). The Changing Nature Of Work. World Development Report 2019. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2019
  • World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future of Jobs Report 2020. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020/